Sounds a bit pointless if this is true. He's in the last year of his contract come the end of the season, so they will have to do business since Wanyama says he won't sign another contract. I don't think its in their business plan to let a player with his value leave on a free-transfer.
spurs chairman levy seems to be getting it in the neck from every club and pundit.i ask you how; when transfers seemed to be coming to a sensible level then along comes city spending 158mill ;unt spending 58mill on a prospect and Chelsea spending there usual 50 mill plus again how do you expect clubs with a much smaller budget to compete in the transfer arena
I feel a Levy blockbuster coming on like that deal we did for the Man U chap via another team
After all, you wouldn't go into Harrods to shop if you want to pay Primark prices would you.
Was the Fryers deal something to be proud of as a club? I found it low, conniving and slimy and it made me ashamed of our club. Each to their own and all that so maybe it's just me......
Really?
Yes - Like I said that is my opinion so each to their own. I am a businessman myself and believe you can play and negotiate hard without compromising your integrity, honour and class at the same time. The Fryers deal was low and classless In MY VIEW.
Was the Fryers deal something to be proud of as a club? I found it low, conniving and slimy and it made me ashamed of our club. Each to their own and all that so maybe it's just me......
And if we were going to the trouble of a very sneaky/clever deal (depending on your opinion) it could've at least been for a half decent player!!
Fair play. I think we went about it really well. Man U have been scandalous in the way they have tapped up our players which is actually against the rules despite the FA never following up on it. What we did was above board but obviously a little sneaky.
But then Levy gets it in the neck as he's "not backing the manager" if he's not going after the targets the manager has asked for. Can't win.
.