- Mar 15, 2015
- 3,650
- 6,363
- Thread starter
- #101
Retarded.
Joe Roooooottttt
Seen that, hopefully they will be done for wasting police timeSome chump has now reported Fury's comments to to police as a hate crime.
Fair enough if he said it specifically at someone in particular, but this claim is political correctness gone mad
I dunno - I guess if it's important to fans to see the real person behind the on screen persona then yeaI agree that he's doing self promotion but I think he should publically voice this opinions because then everyone can see who he is and where he stands. Otherwise you get a kind of Jon Jones fakeness, who has in an interview admitted to acting fake.
At least now it's out in the open people can refute and give him stick for his comments. What he said about Jessica Ennis was nothing though in fact I agree with him, she does look fit in a dress.
What he said about women being best on their back and in the kitchen is not something I take seriously, he's just trying to wind people up.
I don't think he doesTyson Fury is a contender for Sports Personality not Archbishop of Canterbury. Or does everyone need to pass a "PC" test now ?
Compared to the plaster modern sportsperson at least he has a personality.
He lives in a caravan, he is named after Mike Tyson and his surname is Fury, he's a writers dream.
Some chump has now reported Fury's comments to to police as a hate crime.
Fair enough if he said it specifically at someone in particular, but this claim is political correctness gone mad
Tyson Fury is a contender for Sports Personality not Archbishop of Canterbury. Or does everyone need to pass a "PC" test now ?
Compared to the plaster modern sportsperson at least he has a personality.
He lives in a caravan, he is named after Mike Tyson and his surname is Fury, he's a writers dream.
It's the BBC, a state funded broadcaster via the general public which means it carries a much stricter set of guidelines than a commercial entity would do. Giving a quite openly sexist, homophobe a high profile award is probably not something that's going to sit too well within those guidelines. The fact he's even up for the award demonstrates to an extent that the BBC isn't keeling over and avoiding all controversy and theoretically if he stays on the list and wins then they'll give it to him but I can understand why plenty of people think it's not something the BBC should be doing.
If a commercial broadcaster did so then you can argue that people pissed off by it can stop playing subscription fees or stop watching that particular channel. That's not something you can do with the BBC due to the license fee.
Is he being sexist though? IMO its better for the kids to have a stay at home mother than a career mother. I that sexist?
It's the BBC, a state funded broadcaster via the general public which means it carries a much stricter set of guidelines than a commercial entity would do. Giving a quite openly sexist, homophobe a high profile award is probably not something that's going to sit too well within those guidelines. The fact he's even up for the award demonstrates to an extent that the BBC isn't keeling over and avoiding all controversy and theoretically if he stays on the list and wins then they'll give it to him but I can understand why plenty of people think it's not something the BBC should be doing.
If a commercial broadcaster did so then you can argue that people pissed off by it can stop playing subscription fees or stop watching that particular channel. That's not something you can do with the BBC due to the license fee.
He can never win. One he is a twat. And only twats will vote for him. Their reasons being; some misunderstood belief that their vote will allign the chakras of 'righting the political correctness gone mad' syndrome in the universe; Jeremy Clarkson and giving the ruddy BBC a bloody nose. None of this demographic will vote anyway though.
Two. And this is the important one fight fans. It isn't down to the phone vote. The final decision lies with a BBC appointed 3 person panel.
Bloody BBC. Tut.
Goughie took five minutes on talksport the other day to explain why he jacked it in all them years ago. He worked out that the last year he was playing he spent nine months away from his family....that's just bonkers.Root would be a worthy winner, imo. Love him
All those guys you mentioned have some suspicion tied to them and none of them are French, you're suggesting he's only being targeted because he's British? There are non French media who are questioning his performance too.
Why is salbutamol banned if it's not performing enchancing? Diego Ulissi was banned for 9 months for his use of salbutamol. A study done last year shows that it does increase athletic performace.
http://suppversity.blogspot.com.es/2014/09/albuterol-salbutamol-doping-works.html
If you look at Usain Bolt he has some fingers pointed due to his performances and several Jamaicians who have been caught cheating.
However unlike Farah and Froome no one can make a case against him, he's done nothing to faciltate an accusation, he's never missed a drug test. If he ever does that will be a permanent stain on his record.
Even though Farah and Froome have never been found guilty of cheating it's very much in their best interests, to go beyond and above the call of duty to prove their innocence.
He said something along the lines of "their place is in the kitchen or on their back". Sounds pretty sexist to me.
And to be honest saying it's better to have a stay at home Mother rather than a career Mother can be construed as sexist. If you'd said stay at home Parent then fine but why limit caring for children full time to a female occupation.
Is he being sexist though? IMO its better for the kids to have a stay at home mother than a career mother. I that sexist?