In the last 2 seasons, he has the most assists (and goals for that matter) out of all of our full backs and is leading the way this season.I absolutely love his feisty attitude and he was good defensively yesterday but similarly to Walker I do think he is clueless going forward.
If you call rose sloppy in possession then what would you call walker in possession ?
In the last 2 seasons, he has the most assists (and goals for that matter) out of all of our full backs and is leading the way this season.
In fact, last season the only FBs that had more assists than Rose, were Baines, Janmaat & Ivanovic and only Baines had a better assist per min ave. The season before that, the only FBs that had more assists than Rose, were Kolorov, Zabeleta an Evra and Rose has a better assist per game ave than Evra.
This season, Charlie Daniels (originally from our academy) is the only FB with more assists than Rose and Rose has a better assist per min ratio.
Source = transfermarkt.Not sure what your basing your facts on ?
This season, assists per 90 minutes, Walker 0.05, Rose 0.14, Davies 0.16, Trippier 0.24.
Key passes per 90: Walker Rose 0.65, Walker 0.73, Davies 0.93, Trippier 0.97
Chances created per 90: Walker 0.78, Rose 0.79, Davies 1.07, Trippier 1.22
Tripper and Davies are clearly the most productive per time on the pitch.
Source = transfermarkt.
Never mentioned per 90 among our fbs just he has the most assists.
Rose 3.
Davies 2.
Walker 1.
Trippier 1.
Rose has only played 168 mins more than Davies, so not a lot more. According to Transfermarkt, Rose is more productive than Davies per 90.It doesn't matter who your source is, it's disingenuous just chucking totals out when Rose and Walker have played much more than Davies and Trippier isn't it.
Both Davies and Trippier are more productive per time on the pitch this season, despite being much less experienced. Trippier has the same assists in 370 minutes as Walker has in 1970 minutes.
Rose has only played 168 mins more than Davies, so not a lot more. According to Transfermarkt, Rose is more productive than Davies per 90.
Rose, played 1252 mins & has 3 assists (417 mins per assist).
Davies, played 1088 mins & has 2 assists (544 mins per assist).
Trippier you may have a point with and I look forward to seeing him more, but stats are always a bit skewed when a player hasn't played much but has 1 assist, for example if you took Roses first 368 mins of the season (Trippiers total), he also would have 1 assist so would look the same per 90.
He's a Yorkshireman so I imagine he did!Won three penalties since January: another dodgy hand ball against Leicester and chopped down against Sunderland.
Does a very good penaltt appeal. Don't know if he ever played cricket!
it should, but it won't. hodgson will still pick baines, gibbs and bertrand ahead of danny, no matter how they play(if they even play).
If Woy had never even picked Rose for a squad I might agree. But it's not like he's being completely ignored and he is a step above what he was going into last season
EDIT: Baines has been injured most of the summer and is now out again until Mid-nov. And he turns 31 in Dec by the way. Gibbs hasn't started an EPL game yet this season after a huge drop in confidence. That has to affect his chances sooner or later
One of the best - if not the best - games he's played to date imo.brilliant tonight, a typical aggressive rose performance but showed great maturity too.
Roy is going to have a headache after that outstanding Rose performance.