13VanDerBale13
Well-Known Member
- Jul 12, 2011
- 14,403
- 33,930
because its llorente lol, although having said that, they do like to cross a ball from out wide more then we do, so i can see why they want him
Fernando Llorente
- Thread starter THFCSPURS19
- Start date
because its llorente lol, although having said that, they do like to cross a ball from out wide more then we do, so i can see why they want him
Hengy1
Well-Known Member
- Aug 7, 2014
- 2,744
- 7,424
Llorente wouldn’t fix anything
JB_Spurs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 6, 2017
- 558
- 2,153
They're significantly more equipped to play with a target man and he's been a long term top target for Conte, so yes he would.
Johnny J
Not the Kiwi you need but the one you deserve
- Aug 18, 2012
- 18,548
- 48,943
Good. Giroud actually scores plenty of goals (last minute winners, too) in the PL. Llorente has done nothing this season and there's nothing to suggest he'd do anything for Chelsea either.
Streetspur77
Happy Clapper
- Jul 20, 2017
- 2,792
- 9,404
Whatever happens I'd rather Chelsea get llorente then giroud
WiganSpur
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 16,010
- 32,750
Would you rather them have Giroud or Llorente? I know what my answer would be
Spurbanite
Active Member
- Jul 15, 2017
- 63
- 203
Could Llorente be a piece in a different trade scenario? Just before hearing about Llorente, Icardi posted Adios and Chau on social media. Maybe Llorente is a domino in Icardi going to RM.
JUSTINSIGNAL
Well-Known Member
- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,014
- 48,648
He's good player. Proven at all levels throughout his career. Just because we haven't been utilising his strengths isn't his fault.
If Chelsea buy him and use him correctly, which they probably will as Conte has worked with him previously, he will be a dangerous weapon. And we will regret it.
thebenjamin
Well-Known Member
- Jul 1, 2008
- 12,268
- 38,973
Cheeky bid for Aubameyang ?
rossdapep
Well-Known Member
- Aug 25, 2011
- 22,155
- 79,696
Not following......
doctor stefan Freud
the tired tread of sad biology
- Sep 2, 2013
- 15,170
- 72,170
It would be a crazy move on our part
JUSTINSIGNAL
Well-Known Member
- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,014
- 48,648
We're not gonna pay 60m for a back up striker
Mr Pink
SC Supporter
- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,146
- 100,293
Even though we havn't played to his strengths I havn't been impressed with his all round contribution.
He's a very good player but for some reason the effort hasn't been there, just doesn't seem to want to compete enough, I've literally watched him losing aerial challenges that should be his bread and butter.
Hengy1
Well-Known Member
- Aug 7, 2014
- 2,744
- 7,424
He wouldn’t. He’s lazy and useless but that’s just my opinion
stevenurse
Palacios' neck fat
- May 14, 2007
- 6,089
- 10,022
Is gards still ITK? Hes hinted that there might be a replacement lined up and it isn't Rondon
Similar threads
