- Dec 22, 2005
- 2,553
- 2,569
Probably because their thick listeners will bombard the airwaves with racism.
So now all TS listeners are thick and racist?Probably because their thick listeners will bombard the airwaves with racism.
So now all TS listeners are thick and racist?
Think you've just lost any credibility you had with that post.
So now all TS listeners are thick and racist?
Think you've just lost any credibility you had with that post.
I think he got turned down for a job there or something...seems to have a thing about it lol.So now all TS listeners are thick and racist?
Think you've just lost any credibility you had with that post.
But they are all are thick lol.Not all of them are racist.
I think he got turned down for a job there or something...seems to have a thing about it lol.
I think he got turned down for a job there or something...seems to have a thing about it lol.
Photographers used to leave bottles of whisky on paul gascoignes doorstep then ring the doorbell. He'd pick it up and snap. Next day headlines, who's back on the piss again?
It's not about race, it's about what stories sell. They couldn't give a shit what colour you are when they fuck you.
Well thats the point we're making isnt it lol???This is almost like saying that if you’re sexist you can’t be racist as well.
They are scum bags; whether it’s hurting someone with mental illness or addiction or because of their race/sexuality/gender or nationality.
I’m not saying the Mail is a single issue paper that only targets black men. They are just one demographic that are targeted.
This is almost like saying that if you’re sexist you can’t be racist as well.
They are scum bags; whether it’s hurting someone with mental illness or addiction or because of their race/sexuality/gender or nationality.
I’m not saying the Mail is a single issue paper that only targets black men. They are just one demographic that are targeted.
Well thats the point we're making isnt it lol???
That they target any fker to sell a story and dont focus on one race or minority.
They'd sell out their own grandmother to make money.
Not sure who they'd report on who has no race, nationality, sexuality or gender etc. Everyone will fall into one of those catergories and could call foul.
Bit of a contradiction there mate.
No. I am saying that you can be a prick to everyone no matter sex, colour or anything else.
Highlight in my post where i said differently.
Well where you said “it’s not about race”. For me it is. What they do or don’t do to Gazza is irrelevant.
How can it be irrelevant?Well where you said “it’s not about race”. For me it is. What they do or don’t do to Gazza is irrelevant.
Agree.Interesting that we have a debate on the morality / ethics of the british press. Partly because they have none and so there is no need for a debate, but mainly because this thread is entirely the wrong place for it.
I guess opponents fans aren't saying anything about us now the season's over. Time to 'unwatch'.
How can it be irrelevant?
The point is they talk shit about everyone.
Sterling and Alli are probably the most successful, well known and talented English players as well as Kane in the PL lately so they're gonna get more crap written about them as does Kane. The fact they're black is neither here nor there imo. They'd be getting it no matter what their race.
And no worries mate regarding getting point across. We're all looking at this from different view points and different forms of media so I think everyones probably right to an extent.
We're just talking crap and giving opinions which won't make any difference to anything, unfortunately