Tbh I think Eriksen is our back up option.I understand the general sentiment but the incentive for Inter is to get a player who is no longer in the managers plans out of the club and to save on his salary. If they make things exorbitantly difficulty for us and it turns out that we're Eriksen's only viable option and we decide to leave the negotiations, they still have to pay this unhappy player his salary and the manager will still likely not play him. We have better leverage in this proposed deal and they know it. This is all posturing but I hope we have a back-up option regardless.
Hes got no hope ?
haha 300k for a spent Eriksen is laughable.300K a week If Inter think we're going to agree to foot the entirety of his salary and a loan fee then
View attachment 81238
People saying
haha 300k for a spent Eriksen is laughable.
I doubt we are paying £300k for Bale but even if we are he is a four time Champions league winner and it was more than worth the gamble in my eyes. If nothing else he will have given the squad a lot of advice and let them know what they need to do. Hopefully he still has time to come good for us.Yeah! Fools
we'd only spend that on a spent Bale
Told Jose not keen on him returning and it's the agent pushing, not Inter.
Bentaleb’s probably keen on a move away from Schalke...Pretty obvious that Jose is about as interested in Eriksen as he is in Dele or Bale. More likely to bring back Livermore
I doubt we are paying £300k for Bale but even if we are he is a four time Champions league winner and it was more than worth the gamble in my eyes. If nothing else he will have given the squad a lot of advice and let them know what they need to do. Hopefully he still has time to come good for us.
Eriksen on the other hand was with us a year ago and hadn't played well for at least a year before that!
Told Jose not keen on him returning and it's the agent pushing, not Inter.
If getting rid of Dele and bringing in Eriksen made us money this would make sense however, it doesn’t sound like it will. I get the feeling that people just want a transfer to get excited about more than anything.
If getting rid of Dele and bringing in Eriksen made us money this would make sense however, it doesn’t sound like it will. I get the feeling that people just want a transfer to get excited about more than anything.
Great post. Spot on.This is a typical emotional versus practical debate. To say he's been poor for 18 months isn't accurate;
EPL Record
19/20 - 20 games (most as sub), 2 goals and 2 assists
18/19 - 35 games, 8 goals and 12 assists
17/18 - 37 games, 10 goals and 10 assists
16/17 - 36 games, 8 goals and 15 assists
15/16 - 35 games, 6 goals and 13 assists
14/15 - 38 games, 10 goals and 2 assists
13/14 - 25 games, 7 goals and 8 assists
Statistically 18/19 is his joint 2nd best season with us, and a stop / start 19/20 season in a poor team and mostly as sub is probably not fair judgement on his actual ability.
I don't believe he is in decline, and I don't think there is any real statistical evidence of this.
The correct questions are;
1. Does he fit Mourinho's system?
He certainly has the energy, pressing ability - regularly our top runner, but is physically not overly effective on winning possession back in a way Jose favours in our midfielders. Personally, I think he's more of a fit than Dele or Winks in Jose's system.
2. The emotional part, he clearly has a broken relationship with many fans - can you all accept him.
Being the fickle bunch that we are, if he returns a c. 20 goal contribution season (goals and assist), then I suspect this will be a non issue for the vast majority of fans
3. And lastly, the cost ... £300k is a lot, maybe not for 6 months with a small or negligible loan fee, but 20 weeks of this is £6m.
My opinion: I'd take him, I favour outcomes and the chance of challenging for trophies over the emotional side. It's unlikely we can shell out a transfer fee, so these types of loans are the only realistic way forward for us - he's a goal threat outside of the box from midfield, which very few of our players are, and his speed of play and movement will really help to unlock the door against weaker EPL teams. He's a good transition player and works hard.
Just wanted to dispel the poor for 18 months myth, as I'm not sure that's right.
Great post. There is a peculiar narrative around Eriksen, especially given that he always gave everything he had for us, despite being utterly run into the ground in the second half of the 18/19 season. Its not like he demonstrably downed tools, like Berbatov for example, and sulked for his move.This is a typical emotional versus practical debate. To say he's been poor for 18 months isn't accurate;
EPL Record
19/20 - 20 games (most as sub), 2 goals and 2 assists
18/19 - 35 games, 8 goals and 12 assists
17/18 - 37 games, 10 goals and 10 assists
16/17 - 36 games, 8 goals and 15 assists
15/16 - 35 games, 6 goals and 13 assists
14/15 - 38 games, 10 goals and 2 assists
13/14 - 25 games, 7 goals and 8 assists
Statistically 18/19 is his joint 2nd best season with us, and a stop / start 19/20 season in a poor team and mostly as sub is probably not fair judgement on his actual ability.
I don't believe he is in decline, and I don't think there is any real statistical evidence of this.
The correct questions are;
1. Does he fit Mourinho's system?
He certainly has the energy, pressing ability - regularly our top runner, but is physically not overly effective on winning possession back in a way Jose favours in our midfielders. Personally, I think he's more of a fit than Dele or Winks in Jose's system.
2. The emotional part, he clearly has a broken relationship with many fans - can you all accept him.
Being the fickle bunch that we are, if he returns a c. 20 goal contribution season (goals and assist), then I suspect this will be a non issue for the vast majority of fans
3. And lastly, the cost ... £300k is a lot, maybe not for 6 months with a small or negligible loan fee, but 20 weeks of this is £6m.
My opinion: I'd take him, I favour outcomes and the chance of challenging for trophies over the emotional side. It's unlikely we can shell out a transfer fee, so these types of loans are the only realistic way forward for us - he's a goal threat outside of the box from midfield, which very few of our players are, and his speed of play and movement will really help to unlock the door against weaker EPL teams. He's a good transition player and works hard.
Just wanted to dispel the poor for 18 months myth, as I'm not sure that's right.