What's new

Player watch: Christian Eriksen

mr ashley

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
3,166
8,605
I understand the general sentiment but the incentive for Inter is to get a player who is no longer in the managers plans out of the club and to save on his salary. If they make things exorbitantly difficulty for us and it turns out that we're Eriksen's only viable option and we decide to leave the negotiations, they still have to pay this unhappy player his salary and the manager will still likely not play him. We have better leverage in this proposed deal and they know it. This is all posturing but I hope we have a back-up option regardless.
Tbh I think Eriksen is our back up option.
Which is about right.
 

EQP

EQP
Sep 1, 2013
8,060
30,016


Hes got no hope ?


300K a week :ROFLMAO: If Inter think we're going to agree to foot the entirety of his salary and a loan fee then

jordan laugh .gif
 

yido_number1

He'll always be magic
Jun 8, 2004
8,744
16,986
Yeah! Fools

we'd only spend that on a spent Bale
I doubt we are paying £300k for Bale but even if we are he is a four time Champions league winner and it was more than worth the gamble in my eyes. If nothing else he will have given the squad a lot of advice and let them know what they need to do. Hopefully he still has time to come good for us.

Eriksen on the other hand was with us a year ago and hadn't played well for at least a year before that!
 

EQP

EQP
Sep 1, 2013
8,060
30,016
I doubt we are paying £300k for Bale but even if we are he is a four time Champions league winner and it was more than worth the gamble in my eyes. If nothing else he will have given the squad a lot of advice and let them know what they need to do. Hopefully he still has time to come good for us.

Eriksen on the other hand was with us a year ago and hadn't played well for at least a year before that!

Agreed. I shake my head when some posters try and go for the "edgy" comments by making false equivalences to sell their point. No one sane would dare claim Eriksen and Bale comparable and given how the Bale situation has played out, we certainly wouldn't structure or offer any "Bale" type deal to any other player anytime soon.
 

robspur

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2009
119
679
This is a typical emotional versus practical debate. To say he's been poor for 18 months isn't accurate;

EPL Record
19/20 - 20 games (most as sub), 2 goals and 2 assists
18/19 - 35 games, 8 goals and 12 assists
17/18 - 37 games, 10 goals and 10 assists
16/17 - 36 games, 8 goals and 15 assists
15/16 - 35 games, 6 goals and 13 assists
14/15 - 38 games, 10 goals and 2 assists
13/14 - 25 games, 7 goals and 8 assists

Statistically 18/19 is his joint 2nd best season with us, and a stop / start 19/20 season in a poor team and mostly as sub is probably not fair judgement on his actual ability.

I don't believe he is in decline, and I don't think there is any real statistical evidence of this.

The correct questions are;

1. Does he fit Mourinho's system?

He certainly has the energy, pressing ability - regularly our top runner, but is physically not overly effective on winning possession back in a way Jose favours in our midfielders. Personally, I think he's more of a fit than Dele or Winks in Jose's system.

2. The emotional part, he clearly has a broken relationship with many fans - can you all accept him.

Being the fickle bunch that we are, if he returns a c. 20 goal contribution season (goals and assist), then I suspect this will be a non issue for the vast majority of fans

3. And lastly, the cost ... £300k is a lot, maybe not for 6 months with a small or negligible loan fee, but 20 weeks of this is £6m.

My opinion: I'd take him, I favour outcomes and the chance of challenging for trophies over the emotional side. It's unlikely we can shell out a transfer fee, so these types of loans are the only realistic way forward for us - he's a goal threat outside of the box from midfield, which very few of our players are, and his speed of play and movement will really help to unlock the door against weaker EPL teams. He's a good transition player and works hard.

Just wanted to dispel the poor for 18 months myth, as I'm not sure that's right.
 

TropicalYid

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2014
1,503
2,208
We will never pay 300k. Never.
Taking him back is somewhat of a gamble. He didnt do well the last 6-10 months at spurs, hasnt done great at Inter either.
That said, if Levy could work out something reasonable I would love him to come.
I think he is just the kind of player that we lack. (old Eriksen) Can pass, keep the ball, chips in woth assists and the odd goal, always playable.
Miss the Eriksen we had for the first 6 years. That guy could really lift the team.
 

TropicalYid

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2014
1,503
2,208
And by the way, guess he wont be going to arsenal either....read somewhere that they are getting Odegard, from Real madrid, on loan.
 

SCUMmucs

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
188
453
If getting rid of Dele and bringing in Eriksen made us money this would make sense however, it doesn’t sound like it will. I get the feeling that people just want a transfer to get excited about more than anything.
 

spurs mental

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2007
25,575
50,476
If getting rid of Dele and bringing in Eriksen made us money this would make sense however, it doesn’t sound like it will. I get the feeling that people just want a transfer to get excited about more than anything.

Nail on the head. Very little or no business done by most PL clubs and it's no surprise given the current climate. Even SSN don't appear to be hyping up the window and they'd hype up a stone throwing competition between two 90 year olds
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
If getting rid of Dele and bringing in Eriksen made us money this would make sense however, it doesn’t sound like it will. I get the feeling that people just want a transfer to get excited about more than anything.

I'm not sure that's it. Even in his final months with us Eriksen seemed to be trusted more than Dele is now and it would make sense as a short term solution. It doesn't seem like it will happen though, especially with those wage demands.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,541
48,822
This is a typical emotional versus practical debate. To say he's been poor for 18 months isn't accurate;

EPL Record
19/20 - 20 games (most as sub), 2 goals and 2 assists
18/19 - 35 games, 8 goals and 12 assists
17/18 - 37 games, 10 goals and 10 assists
16/17 - 36 games, 8 goals and 15 assists
15/16 - 35 games, 6 goals and 13 assists
14/15 - 38 games, 10 goals and 2 assists
13/14 - 25 games, 7 goals and 8 assists

Statistically 18/19 is his joint 2nd best season with us, and a stop / start 19/20 season in a poor team and mostly as sub is probably not fair judgement on his actual ability.

I don't believe he is in decline, and I don't think there is any real statistical evidence of this.

The correct questions are;

1. Does he fit Mourinho's system?

He certainly has the energy, pressing ability - regularly our top runner, but is physically not overly effective on winning possession back in a way Jose favours in our midfielders. Personally, I think he's more of a fit than Dele or Winks in Jose's system.

2. The emotional part, he clearly has a broken relationship with many fans - can you all accept him.

Being the fickle bunch that we are, if he returns a c. 20 goal contribution season (goals and assist), then I suspect this will be a non issue for the vast majority of fans

3. And lastly, the cost ... £300k is a lot, maybe not for 6 months with a small or negligible loan fee, but 20 weeks of this is £6m.

My opinion: I'd take him, I favour outcomes and the chance of challenging for trophies over the emotional side. It's unlikely we can shell out a transfer fee, so these types of loans are the only realistic way forward for us - he's a goal threat outside of the box from midfield, which very few of our players are, and his speed of play and movement will really help to unlock the door against weaker EPL teams. He's a good transition player and works hard.

Just wanted to dispel the poor for 18 months myth, as I'm not sure that's right.
Great post. Spot on.
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
27,017
61,942
Eriksen is one of my all time favourites. I would love to see a 3 of him, Ndombele and PEH. I think alot of teams would struggle against that midfield.
 

SorrellSpurs

Member
Sep 6, 2005
146
20
He's not paid 300,000 squids per week. More like 200k BUT with the tax breaks players like him get in their first two years in Italy it could be the equivalent of 300k.
 

Gassin's finest

C'est diabolique
May 12, 2010
37,718
88,882
This is a typical emotional versus practical debate. To say he's been poor for 18 months isn't accurate;

EPL Record
19/20 - 20 games (most as sub), 2 goals and 2 assists
18/19 - 35 games, 8 goals and 12 assists
17/18 - 37 games, 10 goals and 10 assists
16/17 - 36 games, 8 goals and 15 assists
15/16 - 35 games, 6 goals and 13 assists
14/15 - 38 games, 10 goals and 2 assists
13/14 - 25 games, 7 goals and 8 assists

Statistically 18/19 is his joint 2nd best season with us, and a stop / start 19/20 season in a poor team and mostly as sub is probably not fair judgement on his actual ability.

I don't believe he is in decline, and I don't think there is any real statistical evidence of this.

The correct questions are;

1. Does he fit Mourinho's system?

He certainly has the energy, pressing ability - regularly our top runner, but is physically not overly effective on winning possession back in a way Jose favours in our midfielders. Personally, I think he's more of a fit than Dele or Winks in Jose's system.

2. The emotional part, he clearly has a broken relationship with many fans - can you all accept him.

Being the fickle bunch that we are, if he returns a c. 20 goal contribution season (goals and assist), then I suspect this will be a non issue for the vast majority of fans

3. And lastly, the cost ... £300k is a lot, maybe not for 6 months with a small or negligible loan fee, but 20 weeks of this is £6m.

My opinion: I'd take him, I favour outcomes and the chance of challenging for trophies over the emotional side. It's unlikely we can shell out a transfer fee, so these types of loans are the only realistic way forward for us - he's a goal threat outside of the box from midfield, which very few of our players are, and his speed of play and movement will really help to unlock the door against weaker EPL teams. He's a good transition player and works hard.

Just wanted to dispel the poor for 18 months myth, as I'm not sure that's right.
Great post. There is a peculiar narrative around Eriksen, especially given that he always gave everything he had for us, despite being utterly run into the ground in the second half of the 18/19 season. Its not like he demonstrably downed tools, like Berbatov for example, and sulked for his move.

But I do think that Poche broke him in that 18/19 run in, physically and spiritually. Like the manager, his heart didn't seem to be in it anymore, and he wanted the change. Hence Jose dropping him, and building the team around Dele... which was totally fair enough, in my eyes.

I'm not against bringing him back, but I don't think its a great idea.
 
Top