- Jan 21, 2013
- 17,221
- 31,306
He didn’t even run that much.
Was a candidate for sub the sub
Lamela not running that much is very un-Lamela. Makes you wonder.
He didn’t even run that much.
Was a candidate for sub the sub
What did it make you wonder?Lamela not running that much is very un-Lamela. Makes you wonder.
What did it make you wonder?
And what was the reason for that in your opinion?Why he wasn’t running that much.
And what was the reason for that in your opinion?
I thought it looked like 3.Way I see it it could be any of:
1) He’s been instructed to play like (unlikely tbf)
2) Not 100% fit
3) Hes confused about how he’s being instructed to play
4) Hes not really trying (either consciously or subconsciously (could be not playing for the manager, could be personal stuff off the pitch or could even be general morale/confidence in the team
Cannot remember the last time he made a big impact on a game. Not good enough for us, time to move on.
But if you were a buying team would you invest significant money both as a transfer fee and wages in him?Say this every summer but he needs to be sold
The prick totally got meThats a troll acount.
How does him having COVID (which was never confirmed to my knowledge) make him an easy target?But sure, let's keep roasting Lamela, he's an easy target because he got covid some weeks ago and because he was just as ineffectual as the rest of his team mates on that night.
FFS defend the indefensible if you want, but remind me of one moment where he impacted the game in a positive way (as opposed to dribbling down blind alleys, getting in the way of his teammates and just generally trotting around the place). He didn’t even press as well as he usually does.lol, you guys have gone batshit crazy. Unleashing all of your frustration on a player who entered as a sub, in a match in which virtually not a single one of our players had a positive impact whatsoever (probably only Hojbjerg, with that wonder strike) and in which the coach absolutely made a very weird lineup and decided to play different to what had been working most of the season for who knows what reason (maybe he let himself become influenced by fans such as you, who kept asking for a more possession based style).
But sure, let's keep roasting Lamela, he's an easy target because he got covid some weeks ago and because he was just as ineffectual as the rest of his team mates on that night.
Avatar checks out.lol, you guys have gone batshit crazy. Unleashing all of your frustration on a player who entered as a sub, in a match in which virtually not a single one of our players had a positive impact whatsoever (probably only Hojbjerg, with that wonder strike) and in which the coach absolutely made a very weird lineup and decided to play different to what had been working most of the season for who knows what reason (maybe he let himself become influenced by fans such as you, who kept asking for a more possession based style).
But sure, let's keep roasting Lamela, he's an easy target because he got covid some weeks ago and because he was just as ineffectual as the rest of his team mates on that night.