What's new

Joey barton

DJS

A hoonter must hoont
Dec 9, 2006
31,279
21,788
It would be interesting and slighlty unpeasant if they had a pork together or maybe it would just be disturbed.

Some of the most interesting things in this here life we all live are disturbed. ;)
 

'O Zio

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2014
7,405
13,785

carmeldevil

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2018
7,713
46,382
w7lcbb08qcd71.png
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993

I was hoping he'd be capable of change, as he seems to be intelligent enough to conceptualise it. Been really disappointed in him in recent years, and can only hope this recent episode is more about his reputation rather than being true.

Always have hope that people with abusive childhoods can turn their lives away from repetition
 

easley91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,278
55,264
How he is still involved in football I will never know. He was always just a thug.
 

'O Zio

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2014
7,405
13,785
I was hoping he'd be capable of change, as he seems to be intelligent enough to conceptualise it. Been really disappointed in him in recent years, and can only hope this recent episode is more about his reputation rather than being true.

Always have hope that people with abusive childhoods can turn their lives away from repetition

Never understood this thing about him being intelligent. Seems to be based almost entirely on the fact that he once posted some Morrissey lyrics on twitter.

The guy's a fucking scumbag and always has been.
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993
Never understood this thing about him being intelligent. Seems to be based almost entirely on the fact that he once posted some Morrissey lyrics on twitter.

The guy's a fucking scumbag and always has been.

No, I think that would be defined as ignorance, if you'll forgive the term. If you don't have any familiarity then you won't know, but then it's a flawed concept to judge someone if you don't know much about them beyond the headlines.

He's articulate and possesses the ability to reflect on his own behaviour and personality. I don't particularly think he excuses or denies his behaviour, but tries to deny that it defines him (and appears to lose that battle).

I think there's a very important distinction, when condemning a person, between conscious decision making (e.g. someone who actively likes fighting, pre-meditates an attack) and reactive/unconscious decision making (e.g. the inability to control a part of your instinctive behaviour). I don't think mental health is very well covered off from a point of view of almost childhood PTSD - that is, repeating abusive behaviour.

This is a bit of further viewing to judge him a little more.

 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
Didn't his brother or cousin murder someone in public with an axe?

Obviously, a very troubled (and dangerous) family set-up there.
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993
Didn't his brother or cousin murder someone in public with an axe?

Obviously, a very troubled (and dangerous) family set-up there.

Both, I think. They ran off to amsterdam. His uncle was also murdered in a pub when he was 8.

If you grow up with violence as your normality, it's hard to 'untrain' that. You see it with victims of sexual abuse as children who become adults, too.

Problem will never go away if society doesn't stop condemning these things as actions made willingly, and address the root cause that is the environments kids are left alone to deal with. People often sit around and watch high-profile examples of it and just cast aspersions, instead of using it to drive understanding and change for younger generations who can still benefit/avoid that.
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,317
57,802
No, I think that would be defined as ignorance, if you'll forgive the term. If you don't have any familiarity then you won't know, but then it's a flawed concept to judge someone if you don't know much about them beyond the headlines.

He's articulate and possesses the ability to reflect on his own behaviour and personality.
I don't particularly think he excuses or denies his behaviour, but tries to deny that it defines him (and appears to lose that battle).

I think there's a very important distinction, when condemning a person, between conscious decision making (e.g. someone who actively likes fighting, pre-meditates an attack) and reactive/unconscious decision making (e.g. the inability to control a part of your instinctive behaviour). I don't think mental health is very well covered off from a point of view of almost childhood PTSD - that is, repeating abusive behaviour.

This is a bit of further viewing to judge him a little more.



Unfortunately, he obviously doesn't have the ability or enough desire to do anything about it. There's no excuse for a lot of the things he's done.
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993
Unfortunately, he obviously doesn't have the ability or enough desire to do anything about it. There's no excuse for a lot of the things he's done.

I think ability is fair. Not so sure about desire. That implies that it's a conscious choice.. A bit like claiming someone depressed can't be bothered to be happy etc.

I think in future people will look at criminality as an effect of neglect on society a bit more - understanding that there are people who do things because they need resources/support they either have no access to, or no ability to ask for it themselves. People who do terrible things aren't necessarily terrible people (sometimes, but not automatically), but are simply victims of social neglect.
 
Top