What's new

Pochettino or Conte

Pochettino or Conte ?

  • Pochettino

    Votes: 69 16.9%
  • Conte

    Votes: 339 83.1%

  • Total voters
    408
Status
Not open for further replies.

ljinko888

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2016
2,095
5,404
I respectfully disagree, because the team Conte inherited was far worse than the team Poch inherited IMHO.

Both Royal and Doherty were crap, Reguilon no idea what to do. Sess was broken. Hojbjerg could be sold. Winks was hiding. Ndombele and Lo Celso couldn't give a damn. Dele was playing like retiring. Davies so mediocre. Dier was inconsistent. Lucas no competition and kept playing. Bergwijn no confidence and no form.

Compared the above to what Poch had, the young and prime speedster in Walker and Rose. Eriksen and Lamela showing glimpses of excellence. Bentalab and Mason were hungry. Capoue wasn't too bad. Soldado was a reputable striker we all loved. Chadli was quietly good. And the goat Dembele.

To sum it up, Conte has no great and young talents in the team more than what Poch had then. Yet Conte's transformation of the above players in just 5 months are absolutely phenomenal.

And it's not like Conte did a major overhaul in the first window he has had. He had the vision of talents he wants and trust and let the guys, Paratici and perhaps Levy, did their job. We secured Bentancur and Kulu only, while culling the deadwood. And the rest was history. Look what that brought to us. Then imagine a major overhaul he could have had in the summer.

Poch had the budget and time to make the signings, but he lacked the visions to look for alternatives and stuck too stubbornly to only the shortlisted few. The zero signings for that period was absolutely on him more than on Levy.

And toxic atmosphere? What's more toxic than after a Mourinho's reign and a summer of shambolic manager hunt that involved a Gattuso and ended up so underwhelmingly with Nuno?

And lastly, the identity of the play is surfacing now in just 5 months of Conte's ball. If Conte's ball keeps blowing teams away for 5 seasons, the projected success, I'm not being absolute here, will definitely be alot more possible than Poch, like what Trix had mentioned.

Some good points but still I think this is largely viewed with the benefit of hindsight. The proof of all this is to simply go back and read the threads at the time.

When Poch came in and gave Rose a new five year contract without a ball being kicked the reaction among the fans was not good. It was something Rose himself held a grudge over during his infamous interview in 2017.


When Poch came in Walker had spent the previous season rotating the right back position with Kyle Naughton. I don't doubt Walker had the potential to be where he is now. But in 2013/14 he fell away and it was Poch who brought him back to the level he showed under Redknapp and even got him better. Because Walker always had speed to be dangerous on the overlap but his defensive reading of the game got better. There is a parallel with Reguilon who was part of a good Sevilla team and came with big hype but slightly underwhelmed in his first season but is much better now. Credit to Conte but Reguillon already showed his capability winning the Europa League with Sevilla as a starring player hence why Real Madrid inserted a buy back.

Poch moulded Walker and Rose into top class and highly sought after full backs. And when Walker left and Rose got injured he managed to maintain consistency to get into the Top 4 with their back-ups Davies and Trippier.

Ryan Mason had only ever played four matches for the first team and the last of which came two seasons before Poch arrived. He spent the 2013/14 season in League One on loan. Yes he was a hungry player who was a Spurs boy. He would always give it his all when called upon. Poch is the one who called upon him. Did anyone expect a 23 year old who had been loaned out year after year to become a key player in the summer of 2014? I highly doubt it. Similarly, Dembele was not the GOAT in 2014. He was a highly gifted player on the ball who had to work on his work off the ball.

In 2014 did anyone think that the solution to our striker malaise would come within and that Harry Kane, a 21 year old who spent most of his early years on loan, would develop into one of the finest strikers in history? Most people I remember were still staking their hat on Soldado coming good. And he did have a good reputation and hefty fee so actually it took balls from Poch to pull the plug on that project and stick with the local boy.

Eriksen would have come good no doubt. His playstyle and mentality were perfect. But who predicted in 2014 that the fragile Lamela would go on to become a terrier type forward. Whenever he played he did and in interviews he praises Poch for that.

The point is not to overrate Poch and put him on a pedestal that can't be taken away because he made mistakes and big ones too. But we can't use hindsight to act like all that development was a natural occurence. The players who played for Poch always talk glowingly of him as a sort of mentor. Dele's statement when he left the club brought him and the Poch coaching team up which I thought was rather telling because it had been over two years and three managers since their time together ended.

I remember when Mourinho was supposed to be the final piece of the jigsaw. The serial winner, tactical genius, huge personality. It didn't work out like that at all. Six weeks ago when we were losing left and right and being knocked out by Middlesbrough it showed simply being a "winner" with a great CV does not guarantee success. Having two established world class forwards was something both these men inherited. That helps a great deal because scoring goals is the most important job on the pitch.

So to go back to the original point of whether Conte would have won titles with Poch's teams. Maybe if he got Poch's team exactly as they were at that point in time. But I don't think he would. Precisely because it was Poch's team and I don't think a Conte or a Mourinho in the summer of 2014 would approach that team building anywhere near the same.
 

absolute bobbins

Am Yisrael Chai
Feb 12, 2013
11,658
25,976
If Conte had Poch's team, we'd have won 2 titles, of course taking into account how the other big sides did in those two seasons. There's no doubt in my mind on that.
We'd have won that Champions League final too. Liverpool were there for the taking.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
Some good points but still I think this is largely viewed with the benefit of hindsight. The proof of all this is to simply go back and read the threads at the time.

When Poch came in and gave Rose a new five year contract without a ball being kicked the reaction among the fans was not good. It was something Rose himself held a grudge over during his infamous interview in 2017.


When Poch came in Walker had spent the previous season rotating the right back position with Kyle Naughton. I don't doubt Walker had the potential to be where he is now. But in 2013/14 he fell away and it was Poch who brought him back to the level he showed under Redknapp and even got him better. Because Walker always had speed to be dangerous on the overlap but his defensive reading of the game got better. There is a parallel with Reguilon who was part of a good Sevilla team and came with big hype but slightly underwhelmed in his first season but is much better now. Credit to Conte but Reguillon already showed his capability winning the Europa League with Sevilla as a starring player hence why Real Madrid inserted a buy back.

Poch moulded Walker and Rose into top class and highly sought after full backs. And when Walker left and Rose got injured he managed to maintain consistency to get into the Top 4 with their back-ups Davies and Trippier.

Ryan Mason had only ever played four matches for the first team and the last of which came two seasons before Poch arrived. He spent the 2013/14 season in League One on loan. Yes he was a hungry player who was a Spurs boy. He would always give it his all when called upon. Poch is the one who called upon him. Did anyone expect a 23 year old who had been loaned out year after year to become a key player in the summer of 2014? I highly doubt it. Similarly, Dembele was not the GOAT in 2014. He was a highly gifted player on the ball who had to work on his work off the ball.

In 2014 did anyone think that the solution to our striker malaise would come within and that Harry Kane, a 21 year old who spent most of his early years on loan, would develop into one of the finest strikers in history? Most people I remember were still staking their hat on Soldado coming good. And he did have a good reputation and hefty fee so actually it took balls from Poch to pull the plug on that project and stick with the local boy.

Eriksen would have come good no doubt. His playstyle and mentality were perfect. But who predicted in 2014 that the fragile Lamela would go on to become a terrier type forward. Whenever he played he did and in interviews he praises Poch for that.

The point is not to overrate Poch and put him on a pedestal that can't be taken away because he made mistakes and big ones too. But we can't use hindsight to act like all that development was a natural occurence. The players who played for Poch always talk glowingly of him as a sort of mentor. Dele's statement when he left the club brought him and the Poch coaching team up which I thought was rather telling because it had been over two years and three managers since their time together ended.

I remember when Mourinho was supposed to be the final piece of the jigsaw. The serial winner, tactical genius, huge personality. It didn't work out like that at all. Six weeks ago when we were losing left and right and being knocked out by Middlesbrough it showed simply being a "winner" with a great CV does not guarantee success. Having two established world class forwards was something both these men inherited. That helps a great deal because scoring goals is the most important job on the pitch.

So to go back to the original point of whether Conte would have won titles with Poch's teams. Maybe if he got Poch's team exactly as they were at that point in time. But I don't think he would. Precisely because it was Poch's team and I don't think a Conte or a Mourinho in the summer of 2014 would approach that team building anywhere near the same.

was thinking the same, Poch's team was something he molded to play in his own way, with young players and players such as dembele who were pretty meh before his arrival. Dont think any other manager would've had that group of kids and under performers doing the same thing.

can we not just love both managers equally
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,464
84,110
My summary of the 2 managers.

Poch: took over a young team with some experienced players. He had several players whose attitudes didn't match what he wanted. For the 1st season he adapted well and got reasonable results. For the 2nd season he got rid of the unwanted and quickly formed a squad in his image. We played as a team with a clear playing style better than any in my lifetime.

His problem was in the transfer market. He didn't want a DOF and most of his picks were a disaster. This led to a spectacular stagnation and his firing. But for all my focus on his weaknesses there is no denying that at his best we were an excellent team.

Conte: harder to judge as he has been here for a short period. There's no denying that he is a quality manager. His passion and in game management is versatile and intelligent. He knows the game and knows how to get points.

How long he is planning to stay is anyone's guess. One of his bigger pluses over Poch is his willingness to have a DOF. We've already seen good signings in his one January window. It seems he is on the same side as Paratici and they can work well together.

For me, the key to success is the transfer market. Get the right signings and an average manager can achieve. Poch was appalling in the transfer market and didn't want a DOF. Even if Conte only stays for a short period, in the long run we'll be better off as the signings during his time here will be good.
 

midoNdefoe

the member formerly and technically still known as
Mar 9, 2005
3,107
3,166
I absolutely love poch. What he got this club doing was fantastic. Never in my time supporting spurs had I been so excited by the football being played and the feeling we could beat anyone, no in fact, we were going to beat any team we faced. It’s sad the way it ebbed away and there’s blame all round for that.

Now Conte is here and he has started to create that same feeling. It’s only been a few games where it has started to click, but when it does we really look slick. Cutting through teams and looking unstoppable at times.
It’s feels like that same watershed moment where everyone gets it. The players are understanding what’s expected and the results are solidifying the effort. I’m starting to love conte.

Seems weird to have to choose as Conte wouldn’t be here without the poch era having happened. It lifted us into the sphere of teams where top managers want to be a part of the project. We now have the chance to love conte because of what poch did , so, let’s get conte what he wants and see where we can get to in this next chapter.
 

mattstev2000

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2007
2,803
5,562
Reading this thread is like watching people argue over whether they'd prefer to date Scarlett Johansson or Gal Gadot when their early dating history consists of people like Doris the overweight gout ridden lunch lady from their old school.

...and yes, Gerry Francis is the Doris equivalent in this analogy.
 

mattstev2000

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2007
2,803
5,562
...His problem was in the transfer market. He didn't want a DOF and most of his picks were a disaster. This led to a spectacular stagnation and his firing. But for all my focus on his weaknesses there is no denying that at his best we were an excellent team.

Also, this idea that Poch was dreadful in the transfer market is somewhat revisionist based on the last couple of signings. Really only Ndombele and Lo Celso were complete failures compared to their price tags and the idea that they were solely his choices with the clubs recruitment team baring no responsibility is really unlikely.

Sonny, Dele, Alderwerield, Wanyama, Dier, Moura all signed under Poch (just off the top of my head) and all with a strong positive impact on the club in the past or ongoing.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,464
84,110
Also, this idea that Poch was dreadful in the transfer market is somewhat revisionist based on the last couple of signings. Really only Ndombele and Lo Celso were complete failures compared to their price tags and the idea that they were solely his choices with the clubs recruitment team baring no responsibility is really unlikely.

Sonny, Dele, Alderwerield, Wanyama, Dier, Moura all signed under Poch (just off the top of my head) and all with a strong positive impact on the club in the past or ongoing.
Not revisionist at all. I made numerous posts during his tenure that signings weren’t good.
 

mattstev2000

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2007
2,803
5,562
Not revisionist at all. I made numerous posts during his tenure that signings weren’t good.

Sorry must have misunderstood the definition of revisionist, thought it was about rewriting history rather than changing your own opinion. The historical evidence shows signings during his tenure were generally quite good with some bad buys (Ndombele) and some outstanding buys (Son) so the statement he was bad in the transfer market was wrong.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,464
84,110
Sorry must have misunderstood the definition of revisionist, thought it was about rewriting history rather than changing your own opinion. The historical evidence shows signings during his tenure were generally quite good with some bad buys (Ndombele) and some outstanding buys (Son) so the statement he was bad in the transfer market was wrong.
Incoming signings made under Pohettino's time:

2014/15
Davies, Fazio, Alli, Stambouli, Vorm, Dier, Yedlin

2015/16
Son, Alderweireld, N'Jie, Wimmer, Trippier

2016/17
Sissoko, Janssen, Wanyama, N'Koudou

2017/18
Davinson, Aurier, Llorente, Foyth, Gazaniga,

2018/19
No signings.

How the fuck anyone can look at that and say it was good is truly beyond me.

Alli, Dier, Son, Alderweireld, Wanyama and Llorente are the only good signings that fit the team in 5 years. It was very poor. No revisionism needed, it was just poor. Add to that his plan to hold onto players for a long time and it was no wonder we massively stagnated.
 

Aphex

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2021
6,287
33,052
Conte is a level above Poch, always been the case. Poch might be there one day but Conte is a genuine elite manager in the group with Klopp, Pep etc. Poch isn’t.

I am also not convinced about Poch’s judgement of a player or his tactical acumen. For me he’s more of a motivator of players, builds close bonds and builds harmonious squads and improves players of course but for me Conte ticks all those boxes and more, such as winning major titles and big games.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
Incoming signings made under Pohettino's time:

2014/15
Davies, Fazio, Alli, Stambouli, Vorm, Dier, Yedlin

2015/16
Son, Alderweireld, N'Jie, Wimmer, Trippier

2016/17
Sissoko, Janssen, Wanyama, N'Koudou

2017/18
Davinson, Aurier, Llorente, Foyth, Gazaniga,

2018/19
No signings.

How the fuck anyone can look at that and say it was good is truly beyond me.

Alli, Dier, Son, Alderweireld, Wanyama and Llorente are the only good signings that fit the team in 5 years. It was very poor. No revisionism needed, it was just poor. Add to that his plan to hold onto players for a long time and it was no wonder we massively stagnated.

hmm sissoko and trippier heavily contributed to getting us to a CL final and 4th place to be fair, with former making the uefa champions league squad of the season and being voted tottenham legend's player of the season (2019)
so not too shabby - certainly not god awful

id also say davies isnt a god awful signing nor was foyth. gazaniga and vorm were ok for what they were, just look at the holograms we've had backing up hugo since poch left

all in all i'd say his record is similar to most managers who have been at a club for a long enough time to make a lot of signings
 
Last edited:

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,464
84,110
hmm sissoko and trippier heavily contributed to getting us to a CL final and 4th place to be fair, with former making the uefa champions league squad of the season and being voted tottenham legend's player of the season (2019)
so not too shabby - certainly not god awful

id also say davies isnt a god awful signing nor was foyth. gazaniga and vorm were ok for what they were, just look at the holograms we've had backing up hugo since poch left

all in all i'd say his record is similar to most managers who have been at a club for a long enough time to make a lot of signings
The problem is more the lack of actual good signings. They weren't all disasters but Trippier and Davies were poor choices to be backups Rose and Walker when Poch's playing style relied on the wing backs getting up and down the pitch all game long.

At this stage it looks like we have made 3 good signings this season in Romero, Bentancur and Kulusevski. 3 players who could be good 1st team starters for several seasons. In Poch's time we made 5 in 5 years. Big difference.
 

Bobby TwoShots

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
500
1,839
Lot of revisionism going on in this thread. As a fan since the '70s, there's no doubt for me that Poch was easily the best manager we've had since Burkinshaw. Yeah, he made some mistakes, same as anyone. But he provided us with two things I never expected to see as a Spurs fan: a genuine challenge for the title (twice) and playing in the biggest game in club football. Prior to his last season, we'd go toe-to-toe with any team and look like we could play them off the field. I'm a huge fan of Conte and have high hopes for what we can achieve in the future under him. But at the moment they're still hopes. Why can't we all be excited by Conte without having to downgrade everything Poch achieved?

Let's hope we challenge for the title next season and get to the CL final. Then this will become a proper debate.
 

cabinfever

Cabinfever's blue and white army
May 14, 2004
1,931
2,013
If Conte had Poch's team, we'd have won 2 titles, of course taking into account how the other big sides did in those two seasons. There's no doubt in my mind on that.
Post of the year for me!!
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,464
84,110
Lot of revisionism going on in this thread. As a fan since the '70s, there's no doubt for me that Poch was easily the best manager we've had since Burkinshaw. Yeah, he made some mistakes, same as anyone. But he provided us with two things I never expected to see as a Spurs fan: a genuine challenge for the title (twice) and playing in the biggest game in club football. Prior to his last season, we'd go toe-to-toe with any team and look like we could play them off the field. I'm a huge fan of Conte and have high hopes for what we can achieve in the future under him. But at the moment they're still hopes. Why can't we all be excited by Conte without having to downgrade everything Poch achieved?

Let's hope we challenge for the title next season and get to the CL final. Then this will become a proper debate.
I don’t think people are downgrading what Poch did.

He created an excellent team. Motivated them and got them into a unit better than any other in the Prem era.

Saying he was weak in the transfer market, which he was, doesn’t mean we think he was bad overall.
 

Donki

Has a "Massive Member" Member
May 14, 2007
14,459
18,977
I hope to see Poch back at some point but……..

1649780986789.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top