What's new

The ousting of Daniel (COYS)

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,541
48,824
It's deflection. People are negative because there's genuinely reason to be negative about our Club and have been for some time.

Since 2019, Levy has been running the club poorly. We've made terrible decision after terrible decision. Not backing Poch, furlough debacle, Super League, sacking Mourinho before a cup final, the farcical manager search, Nuno (lol).

I genuinely thought that having gotten past COVID and bringing in Paratici and Conte that things would be different. I thought that the stadium would be the game changer that it was promised to be.

Instead, apart from maybe Richarlison, we've operated the same. Conte looks to be the third high profile manager in a row that is going to leave the club without being backed. Complain about his football all you like but that run towards the end of last season is the only time the club has felt positive since the CL final.

We don't have a plan or strategy, all we get is excuses.

People are fed up and they have a right to be. It's not just SC, the fans home and away are making their voices heard.

I don't think Levy is incompetent or all about profit/money. I do think though that after 22 years we need a refresh. His methods are stale, he's surrounded by the same people with the same mentality.

He needs to go for his sake as much as ours as with every passing window, every visible and embarrassing fuck up is only going to tarnish his legacy. I've always said he's been a net positive for the club but that is diminishing quickly and will continue to do so if we continue in the way we've been going.
Fantastic brilliant post summed it all up perfectly mate
 

YiddoInPoland

You got some statistical evidence to back that up?
Aug 6, 2011
3,057
6,471
Was thinking about this yesterday, and genuinely believe Levy is running the club the way we needed to be run in the early 2000s but not how we need to run now.

The business side has moved on and I don't think Levy has moved on with it. Still don't think we need to drop 400 million a window, but less opportunistic deals that make little sense and more planned strategies need to be in place (not all on Levy).

That said, I think some of the vitriol is way over the top.
 

taricco

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
540
2,084
you can accuse them of lot of things but before ENIC arrived throughout the 90's we never finished above 11th and even flirted with relegation - in the last ten years we have not been below 7th and though we probably should have picked up a pot along the way - but for every owner who comes into a club and improves things there are more than a fair few who go the over way
i have previously been a massive ENIC fan, and everyone can see what they've done for the club. However, you have to look at results over the last 3-4 years, the strategy and the recruitment to see that it's not being run properly on the football side. That's why I think it's time for a change at the top.
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2011
4,041
6,786
Except he's tried it on multiple occasions and it's invariably gone to shit. Pleat meddled and didn't give Hoddle players he wanted, Arnesen came in and built a system then got poached & fucked it up, Commoli came in, agitated to get Jol sacked for his own choice and it was a disaster. I almost forgot about Franco Baldini too, coming in and blowing most of the Bale money. Paratici is yet another go-around with having someone in that kind of position (not counting Hitchen or Tactics Tim because they had less power), & he's probably been the most successful since Arnesen.

I think he's massively culpable for those appointments and he's taken us as far as he can, but you can't say he's not tried to have other people involved with the footballing side of things. Conversely one of the few times he entirely fucked it off was with Redknapp and it was considerably more successful than most of them (although you could say long-term that's caused problems since)!
Arnesen came in and transformed the squad from mid-table to genuinely challenging for top 4. I thought our rebuild was going very nicely (with lots of youthful potential blended with more experienced / complete players like Davids, Naybet & Berbatov). After Chelsea poached him, they probably also ended up with some quality signings during the next couple of transfer windows, who Arnesen previously had lined up for us.

I wasn't at all happy with Commoli's recruitment in the first instance. However, with hindsight, some improved once Harry replaced Ramos and he did sign some of the best players in our club's history (Modric & Bale). Maybe we were slightly hasty sacking him, or maybe he did more harm than good...I'm not sure either way tbh.

Clearly Baldini didn't work out...nor Hitchin.

As much as I loved Poch, I do think his insistence on us not appointing a DoF to oversee transfers was eventually his undoing. It worked fine while we were targeting young players with potential, but didn't once were trying sign already complete players to push on from top 4 regulars to title winners.

We'll never know how Paratici would have done if he'd been recruited during Poch's reign, when the squad was very different to what he inherited. The task of offloading predecessors' expensive failed signings, who are on higher wages than any prospective buyers would contemplate paying, really shouldn't be underestimated...and neither should the task of convincing Levy to sign off on terminating contracts of those players be underestimated. For now, the jury is out on Paratici IMO.
 

vegassd

The ghost of Johnny Cash
Aug 5, 2006
3,360
3,340
Fans will be largely happy.
Levy will be happy as a pig in shit having pulled off another hail mary stay of execution.
I can definitely see those prediction items playing out.

Wouldn't that be the exact sort of behaviour we want from a chairman though? Life you say, it would be a better squad than when Poch left, and with continued reasonable investment it would be kept fresh. So a "stay of execution" seems a bit harsh... more like "acting as we should", although it's yet to be seen if that happens.

These are just examples and of course could be worded slightly differently or better but there is a lot they can say publicly without causing issues whilst reassuring our fans.

Personally I don’t trust a word they say because the past has shown they regularly don’t honour their word but if they actually made a good clear statement not some wishy washy corporate bs then that would be a huge step forwards in the right direction.
Isn't that the exact sort of stuff they come out with every year? Levy at the end of the season and then Paratici giving an assessment after transfer windows (although he might duck it this time around!). It's that kind of non-committal stuff that doesn't mean too much at the end of the day. I might be totally wrong, but I don't see what fan reassurance that gives, especially if like you, people aren't going to trust their words anyway.

I'm definitely interested to see what statement (if any) comes out after this window. And then the massive one will be when the financials come in. They are a year behind obviously, but I'm sure there will be some clever folk who can work out general revenues and what should be available for first team spending.
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,758
16,910
I can definitely see those prediction items playing out.

Wouldn't that be the exact sort of behaviour we want from a chairman though? Life you say, it would be a better squad than when Poch left, and with continued reasonable investment it would be kept fresh. So a "stay of execution" seems a bit harsh... more like "acting as we should", although it's yet to be seen if that happens.
Yeh I think i'd be fairly happy with this. It's a bit unfortunate that Levy went with FP and Conte as the next step in our evolution and FP gets done for basically just being Italian (joking) and Conte has 3 friends die in a year and then needs surgery half way through his first full season in charge.

As others have pointed out Levy has pulled his finger out a fair amount over the last 12 months, with some key signings. He needs to continue this until we have the defence sorted, but I would say the rebuild project is about 50% done now, which isn't bad.

Bringing Poch back in right now, assuming Conte leaves, is probably the best thing to do, although as others have said there needs to be a DoF sorting out player recruitment. FP has made a night and day difference on that front, we've gone from a 1 in 10 (being generous) success rate to at least a 1 in 2 success rate when it comes to transfers since he joined.
 

Ribble

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2011
3,531
4,821
I wasn't at all happy with Commoli's recruitment in the first instance. However, with hindsight, some improved once Harry replaced Ramos and he did sign some of the best players in our club's history (Modric & Bale). Maybe we were slightly hasty sacking him, or maybe he did more harm than good...I'm not sure either way tbh.

Think it's worth remembering that Commoli didn't go out to Croatia and get the Modric deal done - Levy did it personally.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,676
78,544
Was thinking about this yesterday, and genuinely believe Levy is running the club the way we needed to be run in the early 2000s but not how we need to run now.

The business side has moved on and I don't think Levy has moved on with it. Still don't think we need to drop 400 million a window, but less opportunistic deals that make little sense and more planned strategies need to be in place (not all on Levy).

That said, I think some of the vitriol is way over the top.
It does feel like Levy is stuck in that habit of negotiating every transfer down as low as possible. It's kind of like Del Boy after he becomes a millwionaire but he picks up the phone and starts trying to make a deal. I just can't see Levy ever being that guy to start splashing the cash. Even if we got a big investment from QSI I think he still drags out every transfer. He's all about his figures at the end of every tax year and being in profit.
 

easley91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,191
55,039
I often compare Levy to one Vince McMahon in that they both grew their assets over a long period, however because it was such a long period of time their way of thinking and doing things had become stale and old fashioned. Vince was out of touch with what was around him in recent years, even if he could bring in the money. Levy is the same way. Vince finally left (due to some serious allegations and not on his own accord) and the product has seemed fresher under new, younger management.

I do think Tottenham needs a change and a refresh, whether that's just Levy or new owners entirely who knows. We have everything in place off the pitch now, we just need to step it up and match that on the pitch with management and squad recruitment.
 

Trent Crimm

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
3,980
10,600
It does feel like Levy is stuck in that habit of negotiating every transfer down as low as possible. It's kind of like Del Boy after he becomes a millwionaire but he picks up the phone and starts trying to make a deal. I just can't see Levy ever being that guy to start splashing the cash. Even if we got a big investment from QSI I think he still drags out every transfer. He's all about his figures at the end of every tax year and being in profit.

The way the Sports business as an industry has moved on massively. Levy still thinks it’s 2002 and acts accordingly.

I have no problem with maximizing every deal when poss, but at what cost medium / long term is the question?

He’s becoming a Spoon in a world of Forks.
 

Nerine

Juicy corned beef
Jan 27, 2011
4,805
17,425
Some of the hate and vitriol towards Levy is way OTT and quite out of order, IMO.
I think Levy should relinquish control and busy himself doing non-football related stuff, but I don’t really like the way we’re having to go about it to provoke that happening. Then again, generally speaking, it seems views and opinions have to be more and more extreme for the point to get across nowadays.

I dunno.

I think the responses to THST’s questions will be interesting.

Either that or they’ll fail to read the room yet again, and do themselves even more damage.
 

Albertbarich

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2020
5,286
20,060
I often compare Levy to one Vince McMahon in that they both grew their assets over a long period, however because it was such a long period of time their way of thinking and doing things had become stale and old fashioned. Vince was out of touch with what was around him in recent years, even if he could bring in the money. Levy is the same way. Vince finally left (due to some serious allegations and not on his own accord) and the product has seemed fresher under new, younger management.

I do think Tottenham needs a change and a refresh, whether that's just Levy or new owners entirely who knows. We have everything in place off the pitch now, we just need to step it up and match that on the pitch with management and squad recruitment.
Has Levy ever shit himself in public though because he wanted to win a farting contest? If he has I take it all back.
 

only1waddle

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2012
8,240
12,520
Some of the hate and vitriol towards Levy is way OTT and quite out of order, IMO.
I think Levy should relinquish control and busy himself doing non-football related stuff, but I don’t really like the way we’re having to go about it to provoke that happening. Then again, generally speaking, it seems views and opinions have to be more and more extreme for the point to get across nowadays.

I dunno.

I think the responses to THST’s questions will be interesting.

Either that or they’ll fail to read the room yet again, and do themselves even more damage.

I can't see anything other than bog standard corporate answers.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,676
78,544
I often compare Levy to one Vince McMahon in that they both grew their assets over a long period, however because it was such a long period of time their way of thinking and doing things had become stale and old fashioned. Vince was out of touch with what was around him in recent years, even if he could bring in the money. Levy is the same way. Vince finally left (due to some serious allegations and not on his own accord) and the product has seemed fresher under new, younger management.

I do think Tottenham needs a change and a refresh, whether that's just Levy or new owners entirely who knows. We have everything in place off the pitch now, we just need to step it up and match that on the pitch with management and squad recruitment.
Yeah I can see the comparison. Vince was out of touch with what the fans wanted. He loved his big guys but fans want to see more smaller technical guys nowadays. Although one major difference is that as soon as Vince would come out the fans would go wild for him. If they wanted change they should voice it when they get the chance. At least with Levy we're making it known we're not happy with him. I just hope it continues because the window still wasn't showing enough ambition.
 

nico97531

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2006
593
946
I can definitely see those prediction items playing out.

Wouldn't that be the exact sort of behaviour we want from a chairman though? Life you say, it would be a better squad than when Poch left, and with continued reasonable investment it would be kept fresh. So a "stay of execution" seems a bit harsh... more like "acting as we should", although it's yet to be seen if that happens.


Isn't that the exact sort of stuff they come out with every year? Levy at the end of the season and then Paratici giving an assessment after transfer windows (although he might duck it this time around!). It's that kind of non-committal stuff that doesn't mean too much at the end of the day. I might be totally wrong, but I don't see what fan reassurance that gives, especially if like you, people aren't going to trust their words anyway.

I'm definitely interested to see what statement (if any) comes out after this window. And then the massive one will be when the financials come in. They are a year behind obviously, but I'm sure there will be some clever folk who can work out general revenues and what should be available for first team spending.
I admire your optimism, looking for the positive in a shitty situation and I am glad that our team will be finally better than the team when Poch left after 3 years and 6 transfer windows but I am not sure reasonable investment will be enough when it’s looking more and more likely that we will have to replace the three players that have kept us in the races during the last few years.
I don’t think we can replace the roughly 40 goals a season from Kane and Son. We may be able to cope with losing one of them but not both.
Danjuma and richarlison may be good players but they won’t get near those numbers, and can you see Levy actually splashing the kind of money required to get us a forward that’s going to guaranteed 20 goals a season? Let alone 2.
 
Top