Agree. Big difference today were his contributions forward. Some really good passes and he also hit a couple on the volley.Special mention for this guy today, I thought he did great. Worked really hard and some lovely passes , one In the first half was a beaut.
I don't think he's a bad player. He's tidy on the ball, more mobile than hojbjerg and capable of some nice passes like the one in the first half. Easily a.squad player.Special mention for this guy today, I thought he did great. Worked really hard and some lovely passes , one In the first half was a beaut.
And he was one of the players that was taken ill during the week.Ran his little legs off today. Thought he had a very good performance, pressed like a man possessed and didn’t stop running.
Probably did everything the manager was wanting him to do.
We were in the white shirts.i must of been watching something else, to me he did nothing to earn such praise, couldn't get into the game
Fully agree, if coaching is gonna improve any player it will be a young one like skipp.Who'd have thought that after a long time off with injuries, then getting played in a position that's new to him, he'd actually start improving with more game time?
He's a good little player and deserves a lot more credit and understanding than he gets on here.
His progressive play is improving too.
The last time he had a run in the team, he literally got better with every game he played, right up until he got injured, so let's not write him off just yet.
And by all accounts, Skipp is a bit of a student of the game, always willing to learn.Fully agree, if coaching is gonna improve any player it will be a young one like skipp.
Yes that was a frustrating moment. He was in acres of space.there was 1 very good underlapping run which BJ should have played him in too