- May 14, 2005
- 1,150
- 670
Good spot.Maybe its an Australia only kit.Having seen what they wear its obvious Australia gets dressed in the dark, so designs are less thought out over there
That is revoltingAnother angle of the new shirt
Fuck thatI know many don't agree, but I don't care
Naff you sportswear brands, naff your Asian insurance corporate harpies, naff you all, cos that ain't no Spurs shirt
Beige AND red on the lillywhite Spurs shirt, naff you.
"Interesting" neck lines and blocks of blue, naff you
Just be a compliant sports consumer and accept that the needs of corporate brands are more important than community and tradition, naff you too.
I might be mistaken but if you look underneath the shirt, it looks like our current 15/16 shirt with the diagonal stripes in the background/behind it.
Which could indicate that the shirt in front, ie the so-called new 16/17 shirt, is actually a fake!
......even though I actually quite like it!
Or it's just on a hanger in front of old stock
True!
But then why would you just have ONE new shirt?
True!
But then why would you just have ONE new shirt?
If that really is our kit, I'm praying to God it's not, then that is a disgrace to our history considering it's our last ever season at the Lane. Surely you give a nod to the past and go with a updated version of the first ever kit we wore at WHL.....
looking at the kit history. in 1899 it was a white top with a collar, blue shorts and socks. The away kit was was the gold and brown/black striped one you say.Wasn't the first kit we wore at White Hart Lane brown/gold stripes? Can't see people going for that when many are already apoplectic at the thought of a shirt with a red sponsors logo and bit of blue on the shoulders
My favourite home and away kits still both come from the same season - 2012/13.
Absolutely love the use of silver on the home kit, really subtle and classy, and adore the classic collar. The away kit is just a really nice, simple kit with proper use of reverse blue and white.
I even liked the strange grey/black kit that season. Had high hope for UA and whilst I've generally liked the kits they've supplied, I think they outdid themselves this year.
The thing that made a HUGE difference of course was having a sponsor name in blue/white and not in bloody red! Fucking Asian sponsors and their stupid red is lucky superstition!
looking at the kit history. in 1899 it was a white top with a collar, blue shorts and socks. The away kit was was the gold and brown/black striped one you say.
It might be we have a white home top, the normal blue or yellow away and a 3rd kit of a brown and gold striped for a special edition just so they can milk the money off all 3.
Being from Australia I can tell you that these are the hangers types and colour for sizing used in Rebel sports (Australia's biggest sports shop)I might be mistaken but if you look underneath the shirt, it looks like our current 15/16 shirt with the diagonal stripes in the background/behind it.
Which could indicate that the shirt in front, ie the so-called new 16/17 shirt, is actually a fake!
......even though I actually quite like it!
We didn't win the PL
Or it's just on a hanger in front of old stock