What's new

2024 onwards Champions League Wildcard qualifying

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,164
15,642
Thought I'd start tracking how Wildcard qualifying looks for the Champions League, with the new format starting in 2024.

The two teams with the best coefficient score over the last 5 years, who haven't qualified for the UCL group stage but have qualified for Europe, will be upgraded to a UCL place. The coefficient is calculated by giving each team 2 points per win in Europe, and 1 point per draw (excluding qualifying rounds, and from this season onwards the First Knockout Round of the Europa League and Conference League, since sides winning their group will skip this). Games decided on penalties are counted as draws.

There are also bonus points. In the Champions League, you get 4 points for playing in the Group Stage, 5 points for reaching the Last 16, and 1 point for reaching each of the QF, SF and Final. In the Europa, you get no bonus but a minimum of 3 points for the Group Stage (i.e. if you lose all 6 games you still get 3 points, but if you get some wins you don't get an additional bonus), a 4-point bonus for winning the group, a 2-point bonus for finishing 2nd, and a 1-point bonus for reaching each of the L16, QF, SF and Final. And in the Conference League, you get no bonus but a minimum of 2.5 points in the Group Stage, a bonus of 2 points for winning the group, a bonus of 1 point for coming 2nd, and a bonus of 1 point for reaching each of the SF and the Final. Teams going out of the Conference League before the Group Stage get 1 point for going out in the First Qualifying Round, 1.5 for the Second, 2 for the Third, and 2.5 for the Playoff.

The table so far is:

2024 CL.PNG


Gold = Top 2, so guaranteed a wildcard spot in the unlikely event a team this good needs it.
Green = A position good enough to have secured a wildcard spot every time so far, had this format been in place since 2017 (harder to calculate before then as the coefficient system changed a lot).
Yellow = A position which would have been good enough in some years since 2017, but not others.
Red = A position in the Top 25, but not good enough in any of those years
Grey = Teams outside the Top 25 which may still have a chance (they a) have enough points to potentially make the ground to Yellow up, b) are from a major league, and c) are in Europe this season).

Therefore, performing well in Europe over the next three years is important, even if we don't win trophies. In order to reach Yellow, we'd need approximately 20 points per season over the next three years. To be on track this year, we'd need something like going through the group as winners with 4 wins and 2 draws, getting through both the R16 and the QF with a win and a draw over the two legs, and then going out in the SF with a draw and a loss.

In order to reach Green, we'd need approximately 25 points per season over the next three years. To be on track this year, we'd need something like going through the group as winners with 5 wins and 1 draw, winning both legs in the R16 and the QF, and then winning the Semi Finals on aggregate after a win and a loss.

The first matches relevant to this contest are taking place this week. The main one is Genk vs Shakhtar Donetsk in the Champions League Third Qualifying Round. We want Shakhtar to go out to aid in our pursuit of them. In the same round, there's also Malmö vs Rangers and Spartak Moscow vs Benfica, but Rangers and Benfica are both a fair amount behind us at present.
 
Last edited:

Delboy75

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2021
3,935
10,279
Your table is slightly misleading as we currently sit 15th. But I get why you’ve done it like that. Arsenal are totally screwed with zero points this season lol.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,164
15,642
Your table is slightly misleading as we currently sit 15th. But I get why you’ve done it like that. Arsenal are totally screwed with zero points this season lol.
I don't think it's misleading at all for this purpose. We're 15th for the current season, which means we'll be in Pot 1 for the Conference League Group Stage. Indeed, had the new format been in place this year, we would have qualified as a wildcard! But that's including the points from 2016-2019 which are completely irrelevant to the ranking in 2024 which will decide the wildcard spots. Unfortunately our last couple of years have obviously been weaker and they're the ones that count. (Sorry, aware you almost certainly know this already, just clarifying for the sake of anyone else reading!)

Yep, Arsenal are stuffed haha. To make it up they'd need something like 29 points next season and the one after - not utterly impossible but very unlikely. Being in this tournament may be seen as a bit of a pain right now, but as well as a chance at a trophy it makes a big impact on our future prospects.
 

Delboy75

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2021
3,935
10,279
Yeah you’re right, your way is a true picture I just preferred the slightly misleading one haha ( appreciate the effort) it’s crazy that the conference points are actually quite decent and should actually get us in top 15 by end of season.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,164
15,642
Yeah you’re right, your way is a true picture I just preferred the slightly misleading one haha ( appreciate the effort) it’s crazy that the conference points are actually quite decent and should actually get us in top 15 by end of season.
We'd need around 23 for aiming to hit 15th by the end of this season - doable, but far from certain and would mean at least reaching the SF! But yes, it's good that the Conference League and Europa League are almost as good for earning points - I think it's deliberate to encourage the big teams who are disappointed not to have made the Champions League to still take them seriously. Might not work immediately, but come 2024 there's every chance somebody misses out on the CL because they sent the U23s to the North Pole for a Conference League group stage tie when they were already through, and you'd think that would change minds somewhat!
 

Delboy75

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2021
3,935
10,279
I don’t think clubs/media will really start to take it seriously till 23/24. But the coefficient table will then become some sort of weird European sub league, where as you say won’t be any room for coasting group games, every coefficient point could be crucial. Will be mad last few weeks of season trying to work out all the different possibilities.
 

Ashley1974

reading between the lines
Aug 31, 2012
1,042
3,516
Fantastic post. Thank you for doing that.

Am I thought in thinking the at wins in each European competition give the same score. So if we win every match of the group stage etc we are in a really strong position?

I read an article in the middle of last season that states the importance of certain teams to take the UECL seriously if they qualifies for it (us, Arsenal among others).
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,164
15,642
I don’t think clubs/media will really start to take it seriously till 23/24. But the coefficient table will then become some sort of weird European sub league, where as you say won’t be any room for coasting group games, every coefficient point could be crucial. Will be mad last few weeks of season trying to work out all the different possibilities.
The media certainly won't. Smart clubs should though, as this season is just as important to it as 23-24 will be! Wouldn't be surprised if we see some stronger lineups than expected in the early stages. I certainly don't expect to see an all fringe/kids lineup unless we're 4-0 up from the first leg in the Playoff, where there's no extra points for winning on the night in the second leg, or draw literal part-timers from Pot 4 in the group stage.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,164
15,642
Fantastic post. Thank you for doing that.

Am I thought in thinking the at wins in each European competition give the same score. So if we win every match of the group stage etc we are in a really strong position?

I read an article in the middle of last season that states the importance of certain teams to take the UECL seriously if they qualifies for it (us, Arsenal among others).
Yep, absolutely. 2 wins for a win, 1 for a draw, no matter what competition you're in. Obviously the bonus points come into play as mentioned in the first post, but mostly it's a surprisingly simple system and you're spot on to point out that winning the 'easy' group matches is extremely important even if you're going through anyway. E.g. in the Conference League, it's just as good to win all 6 group games but then get thumped 10-0 in the R16, as it is to get through in 2nd with 3 wins and a draw, win 10-0 in the First Knockout Round, win both legs of the R16, then win one leg and lose the other in the QF to go out on aggregate.
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,662
34,802
There will be a European Super League by then replacing the CL and we will be in it in my opinion
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,662
34,802
This change is essentially just subtle elitism, really.
UEFA is massively corrupt, and the big boys who everyone wants to watch are the golden goose for them. It’s not surprising they want a bigger slice and less UEFA control
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,164
15,642
This change is essentially just subtle elitism, really.
I'm in favour of this one, to be honest. It isn't the "super" clubs which benefit; they're qualifying anyway. It's second-tier teams which qualify and take Europe seriously every year. I think that's fair enough, and it's also a very clever way of making every match matter for those sides, rather than seeing them mess around throughout the Europa or Conference League Group Stages and get through easily anyway.

If it'd been in place for the last four years, the beneficiaries would have been Arsenal*3, Tottenham*2, Sevilla*2, and Roma.
 

whitesocks

The past means nothing. This is a message for life
Jan 16, 2014
4,652
5,738
...
If it'd been in place for the last four years, the beneficiaries would have been Arsenal*3, Tottenham*2, Sevilla*2, and Roma.
So ManU, finishing 6th in 18/19, wouldn't have got bumped up?
chelsea finishing 5th in 17/18 likewise?
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,164
15,642
So ManU, finishing 6th in 18/19, wouldn't have got bumped up?
chelsea finishing 5th in 17/18 likewise?
Nope. For the 19-20 UCL, Sevilla (7th in the coefficient table with 104 points) and Arsenal (9th, 101) would've taken the places, while United were 18th with 78. For the 18-19 CL, it would again have been Sevilla (6th, 113) and Arsenal (9th, 93) - Chelsea were 13th with 82.

Basically, Arsenal got a lot of points by very consistently beating dross in the Europa League over a few years, and that's the model you want to be following to get these places. Both Chelsea and United had failed to qualify for Europe in one year of those five-year cycles and that's pretty terminal to your chances unless you do very very well in the other four.
 
Last edited:

M.I.B.

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2004
1,047
2,260
This could turn out to be one of the longest running threads ever!!
Good work though......wish I had this much time on my hand ;) :)
 

cockerel downunder

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2008
925
2,214
It seems odd that they didn’t give higher weighting to CL wins vs Europa or conf. Good for us though!
However was looking forward to semi youth teams in Europe this year but I’m guessing we will take it quite seriously with this in mind
 

BPR_U16

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2006
1,790
2,631
Very informative piece and i'm sure the club are well aware of conference even if large swathes of both fanbase and press arent.

Now you have the job of keeping it up to date ?
 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
So realistically we'd only need to finish around 14th or 15th place on that table, to qualify as the first 14 or 15 teams will more than likely qualify through the league.

So that's 10pts, or thereabouts, to make up.
 
Top