- Apr 21, 2005
- 9,429
- 12,383
Looks good - quite mobile for a big lad too
£5m and sell Kane for £1.5 to £2.5m would be great business
£5m and sell Kane for £1.5 to £2.5m would be great business
IMHO I think we would be doing well to get 2-3m for Kane- could be wrong just can't see anyone paying that for a player about to turn 20 who is yet to prove himself
Looks good - quite mobile for a big lad too
£5m and sell Kane for £1.5 to £2.5m would be great business
Admitting our expensive academy and scouting network is failing doesn't sound like great business to me.
Admitting our expensive academy and scouting network is failing doesn't sound like great business to me.
Depends what you class as failure. Sales to lower league clubs pays for the academy system over and over again. The facts are that it's increasingly hard for clubs to produce their own players based on their own catchment area - especially in a capital city where there is more competition.
I know the ideal is to bring through players from the u18s to the first team but it doesn't happen. Players develop at different rates, injuries, distractions, general natural growth issues. Man Utd with the Beckham generation and the current crop of Barcelona players are definitely the exceptions - and even then, they are from all over and different age groups.
Plus, the expensive academy won't produce players immediately. Players like Alex Pritchard are the benchmark for it now. Players like Kane are from before. With new coaching, new facilities and more of a focus on ability rather than teaching skills to big players there should be better players coming through. You can sort of see the beginnings of it with Townsend, Caulker and Livermore making it at Prem players. Whether you think they are good or not is another matter. They have been playing for Premier League teams and Livermore was called up for England.
Supplementing the team with good prospects from overseas is a smart policy and removes a lot of the usual risks of local scouting, if the player is already in the system - like Cornelius is - then he's bound to have something about him.
My problem is that we have a kid like Carroll who strongly features in what I consider first team talent, even if possibly he might be better off with a PL loan in the 2013/14 season, and then we go and buy someone in a similar mould. It would be like buying a right back last summer ahead of Kyle Walker. Or a centre-half that was similar to Steve Caulker.
The "failure" was a knee-jerk comment as the system is working. What worries me - and this is possibly why this is only a rumour and not happening, to be fair - is that we don't seem to know or care that it's working in this instance.
Looks good - quite mobile for a big lad too
£5m and sell Kane for £1.5 to £2.5m would be great business
The problem with someone like Carroll is that it needs a lot of faith to put him in the first team on a regular basis, we can't afford to lose many games or underperform anymore. He's good, I agree, and has potential to become better but if they don't feel he is ready yet then he's better off watching or on loan somewhere.
We don't know how far along the process is and Cornelius is a Danish international now, he's going to be well known in football circles and not easy to purchase. It's good that Spurs would look at players they can develop, as well as cheaper, but Copenhagen will know his worth.
The part about Fischer, Eriksen and Cornelius compared to each other, is also in the Eriksen thread IIRC. Anyway, rumour in Denmark is, that FC Copenhagen will only sell if they receive a bid north of about 7-8 million £, I don't see us (or anyone else for that matter) paying that amount for him as of now.
As i said in an earlier Daily ITK thread, he seems a levelheaded guy, and not one to push for a move, just for the sake of it (or the money, or whatever). I think it's most likely, he'll stay at FCK for at least one more season, to further his development.