- May 14, 2007
- 14,455
- 18,975
my hunch is we took Diet off because of his yellow card. I would have had both Wanyama off and Davies for Son and Winks
Son at LWB?
my hunch is we took Diet off because of his yellow card. I would have had both Wanyama off and Davies for Son and Winks
When the change was made did ypu honesty think that at the time?We fell apart because we replaced Dier with Son. If we'd replaced him with Winks, things might have been different.
Latest ITK may point towards a Martial - Spurs player swap deal...? As unlikely as it seems. I'd be surprised if they're still in for Dier, having signed Matic, but Rose wouldn't be beyond the realms of possibility.
Rose was phenomenal for us until his injury last season, but with all the controversy surrounding him, I do wonder if he has slightly burnt his bridges with club's hierarchy.
Unlikely but not impossible?
Swap deals are incredibly difficult to facilitate. Huge (financially speaking) ones like this I'd hazard a guess would be ridiculously so. Just don't see it happening, if of course that is even being considered.
There's something I never quite understood about that.
Am I wrong in thinking that a swap would mean less taxes than 2 separate transfers going opposite ways?
More likely they just want to replace him as well. Mourinho wanted 4 with his current squad, probs one more if martial departs."There is a deal that could happen which is a long shot, this deal would depend on multiple others happening but would be massive for us but will also come at a loss."
If this refers to Martial, as has been suggested, it must mean more than a straight swap deal.
More likely that we sell a player to one club, that allows them to free up a player to sell to another etc until Man U get a player that allows them to let us buy Martial - again, assuming this is the player in question.
So, it's not just a case which of our players Man U covet.
This. It's known they want Perisic, and if he or another like him arrives, then Martial is getting bumped another rung down.More likely they just want to replace him as well. Mourinho wanted 4 with his current squad, probs one more if martial departs.
Why does it have to be a swap? Could just be two separate deals
Gyid from ITK "There is a deal that could happen which is a long shot, this deal would depend on multiple others happening but would be massive for us but will also come at a loss."
If this refers to Martial, as has been suggested, it must mean more than a straight swap deal.
More likely that we sell a player to one club, that allows them to free up a player to sell to another etc until Man U get a player that allows them to let us buy Martial - again, assuming this is the player in question.
So, it's not just a case which of our players Man U covet.
Yep. Said as much in the match thread, before any changes were made.When the change was made did ypu honesty think that at the time?
Anyone that thinks Mourinho's selling Martial to us especially after the last 2 games needs their head checked.