- Jul 29, 2004
- 19,539
- 330,652
And I get that, it's totally understandable considering their owners.People really are worrying about Newcastle. They'll start chucking money at better players now that they're showing some form too. FFP shouldn't be too much of an issue for them either for the time being. Will be interesting to see who they try for in Jan.
The way it was brought up by @FloridaSpur though was laughable. He posted as if they are some sort of example that sacking managers over and over is ok and doesn't fuck the club, why? Because the only example he could have given to point to the fact it can work and doesn't affect how successful a club is, is Chelsea and he didn't want to do that because A/they are behind us after sacking another manager, and B/ their spend in doing so is off the charts.
Klopp needed time and money
Pep needed time and money
Arteta has needed time and money(I'm including him because he's being referenced a lot right now because of league position)
Fergusson took over United in 1986 didn't win the league until 1993, needed both time and money
Yet @FloridaSpur put forward Eddie Howe and Newcastle to debunk my post as tripe that sacking managers and not having stability and time to build was ok.
Last edited: