Any news on 08/09 spurs kits?

[van_Pommel]

Here are most of the mock ups..........

These three would be good. Lovin' that shade of blue.

 

[DC555]

I do prefer the navy shorts

 

[Yid-ol]

i dont mind the first 3, all look decent to me

 

[wizgell]

We always make a massive fuss about the launch of the new kit,with the slow reveals etc. When our kit is probably the most basic in the Premierleague: it's either; white shirts with blue shorts, white with a bit of blue shirts. and blue shorts, white shirts and shorts.

 

[Dibby]

I'm guessing Robbie is wearing this to stop people thinking he's British.

 

[llamafarmer]

I want us to stay all white for branding and colour association purposes.

For what now?

White shirts, navy shorts and white socks is our traditional colours. I thought I'd love the all white, but it just doesn't look quite as good somehow.

 

[N10toN17]

I want us to stay all white for branding and colour association purposes.

I'm surprised you haven't stated that you'd prefer us to play in red and white, that'd just about sum you up, branding and colour association wtf? Football is not your game pal, try egg chasing or even better american sports.

 

[Kendall]

white shirts, blue shorts, blue socks with white tops, just like the 1961 kit

sexual

 

[Kendall]

and the 91 cup winning kit

 

[hughy]

Most of those look like training tops. That black one is shit hot, however.

 

[nicdic]

They are disgusting.

 

[DOX]

I want us to stay all white for branding and colour association purposes.

:hump::hello:

 

[Rocksuperstar]

The second to last one looks passable as an away shirt, if a bit MLSish.

That pale blue/grey one - from what i remember, Man U aren't the only side to say grey shirts make it hard to pick your teammates out from the fans in the stands behind them, or something? :think:

As said, nice looking shirt, but they mostly look like training kits, like that material basketball shirts are made of :shrug:

 

[weststandvoice]

They all look a bit cheap. Is the tea bag look in then?