What's new

Dembele - Costa

UpTownSpur

Says it like it is
Dec 31, 2014
2,266
4,362
It didn't look like a gouge to me. More like he just touched him under the eye. If he'd have gouged him Costa would have made more of it.
 

alpha

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2005
1,141
870
It didn't look like a gouge to me. More like he just touched him under the eye. If he'd have gouged him Costa would have made more of it.

That's how I see it really. I remember Mourinho gouging someones eye a few years ago when he was managing Real. And that did look like a proper 'gouge'.
 

ajspurs

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2007
23,185
31,489
Costa's so used to play acting that he doesn't even put his hand to the eye that was touched by Dembele :ROFLMAO:
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,889
32,562
I think it was crazy from Dembele, and no defending it. I admit though my views are shaped from being a big rugby fan and gouging/fingers in the eye being an absolute no-no that is really treated harshly and clamped down on. In rugby even lower grade clumsy/accidental 'contact with the eye area' offences are met with bans that are months long (see Chris Ashton recently who got 10 weeks for something very innocuous). A deliberate act would get you at least 6 months and for something as blatant as Dembele it would be longer still.

I'm not saying he should or will get something anywhere near that sort of length, but if the FA did make a bit of an example of him then I wouldn't be shocked. Was a real moment of madness from him.
 

alpha

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2005
1,141
870
I think it was crazy from Dembele, and no defending it. I admit though my views are shaped from being a big rugby fan and gouging/fingers in the eye being an absolute no-no that is really treated harshly and clamped down on. In rugby even lower grade clumsy/accidental 'contact with the eye area' offences are met with bans that are months long (see Chris Ashton recently who got 10 weeks for something very innocuous). A deliberate act would get you at least 6 months and for something as blatant as Dembele it would be longer still.

I'm not saying he should or will get something anywhere near that sort of length, but if the FA did make a bit of an example of him then I wouldn't be shocked. Was a real moment of madness from him.

I'm no Rugby fan so can't comment on how it would be treated, but this appears to be no more than a light scratch of the face, near the eye. I'm not defending Dembele and think it was a stupid act to do, but it looks like he barely touched him. If he had gouged Costa's eye I think his reaction would have been more telling.
 
Last edited:

Cornpattbuck

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2013
6,932
16,034
It was a daft action by Dembele but completely out of character. Frustratingly, it was more innocuous than the Torres one years back on Vertonghen, and that went completely unpunished but resulted in the rules being tightened up.
 

heelspurs

Le filet mignon est un bastion de rosbif
Jul 25, 2012
4,270
5,105
It didn't look like a gouge to me. More like he just touched him under the eye. If he'd have gouged him Costa would have made more of it.
Removing my Spurs-tinted glasses for a moment and this is still how I see it. Anyone, anywhere, and under any circumstances is going to react far more reflexive and violently to an eye gouge. His head would instinctively move away from the poke/gouge yet Costas doesn't. Additionally the linesman had to see it yet when confronted by Clattenburg nothing was reported. My hope was it was just hands-to-face with no contact with his eye. And also, a big hope, that Costa is man enough to admit it like Gareth Barry did with the "no biting" issue.

But if he did gouge him then he deserves banning and it sucks for us.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,024
29,599
60824634.jpg
 

jezz

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
5,651
8,654
All Dembele did was say to Costa you've got something on your eye mate, oh yeah its my thumb:LOL:
 

bat-chain

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2009
2,232
9,478
Guys look at Costa go to,cover the wrong eye after the incident.

If he was gouged how could he instantly go to cover the wrong eye. It's laughable.

I would say it's impossible unless in reality he was not touched at all.

If you look at the eye in question in the moments after the incident it is not blinking or anything.

Again close to impossible I'm sure.
 

Nocando

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2012
2,945
4,385
I'm sure the FA will factor in the mitigating circumstances* and be a bit more lieniant.

*I.e it was Costa and chelsea and they probably had it coming to them.
 

myhartlane

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2004
1,356
1,071
I'm sure the FA will factor in the mitigating circumstances* and be a bit more lieniant.

*I.e it was Costa and chelsea and they probably had it coming to them.
Mate, I really wish it did work like that, if I were on the committee Chelscum would have been wiped of the face of the earth years ago.
 
Top