- Sep 2, 2013
- 15,170
- 72,171
Fair enough- 80 million for a relative newcomer is just too great a risk for us right nowOur interest was when we thought we had a chance around the 40m mark. Soon ended when it doubled.
Fair enough- 80 million for a relative newcomer is just too great a risk for us right nowOur interest was when we thought we had a chance around the 40m mark. Soon ended when it doubled.
Its the same. They are waiting on their owner to agree the deal today (Saturday 21st)Again or is this the one they said they had last week and didn't?
And if we spent 70m on him and he struggled would we regret it?
We can't afford to blow big money on players unfortunately. Ndombele, Soldado, so on and so on.
We keep making expensive mistakes. Our game has always been to get that special player just before they break.
The sensible option would be to get in a striker who can spend a season adjusting so that if Kane goes next year, he can step up.
If Kane stayed and we forked out 70m on Vlahovic, he'd likely play second fiddle and lose confidence. At 70m it's too risky.
At 30m or less, it may not be as much of a loss if they don't work out.
If Kane had left and we got 150-200m for him, then you can take more of a risk and make him the main man. But with Kane in the way, it's too risky to do at that price.
It'll be very interesting to see where we go from here.
Besides we've always done better with the more under the radar types or those who are not demanding high fees.
I think it's fair to believe shopping in the Njie, Nkodou market is showing no ambition and is beneath us.
But it's also fair to not expect the club to get involved in crazy bidding wars.
We were the only team seemingly willing to go high for Ndombele and it's clear why.
We need to shop in the midrange, special talents that are not going to over exert us.
It's where we've gone wrong in recent times, we started chasing the higher end players who every big club was chasing at mega prices (De Jong, Ndombele, Bruno), we then overpaid on younger British players. Then, last season Jose applied the band aid with temporary fixes who turned out to be ill suited (Doherty, Hart, Vinicius)
We need to get back to better scouting with real value. Sarr fits that.
I'd just like to say Ndombele has the ability but is a mental problem, Lo Celso and Lamela blighted by injuries but both have/had potential, Sanchez can be good on his day, Soldado was decent in Spain before we signed him.
Using the timeline from Soldado, we also scouted Dele, Son, Eriksen, Toby, etc. So we've had players work out and not work out. Guess what? That's football. Not every signing will be a roaring success.
Every signing is a risk and nobody knows how they'll react when they arrive in a new country, new culture, new league, new club etc.
I don't.
I can probably count on one hand the number of strikers that have 'survived' the pressure of fees that large so early into a career that is, let's be honest, unremarkable so far.
For context, Haaland went for less than £20m at a far more proven stage in his career.
We didn't get into a billion quids worth of debt to build this fancy new stadium to have the same transfer approach as when we were at the lane.
Were in and we need to compete s s just because some big name buys have gone wrong it doesn't mean we should lower our ambitions.
Let's see what happens come September but this kid and martinez are absolutely the type of buys we should be making.
If only we had addressed it by bringing in a new director of football to choose the signings.Arguably those 4 signings you list at the end are our only truly successful transfers in the last 8-9 years. Got to go back to Dembele and Verts before that
Sorry state of affairs
Not at odd take at all. I was responding to those saying we shouldn't make big money signings because we had in the past and it hadn't worked. It reminded me of when people saying we shouldn't buy players from a league as it hasn't worked in the past.I agree at that price he's a swerve but this is lunacy. Haaland had played 6 months in Austria when he went for that price. Vlahovic just got young player of the year in Serie A. It's unquestionable who is the more pro
This is an odd take given what’s happening at Barca, Real, Juventus and us still living through a global pandemic which has added c.£250 million more onto the aforementioned billion pounds of debt we already had ?
I agree at that price he's a swerve but this is lunacy. Haaland had played 6 months in Austria when he went for that price. Vlahovic just got young player of the year in Serie A. It's unquestionable who is the more pro
Same as every window, we will end up though with a zero net spend yay!
We could have had Bruno if we had paid what they wanted in the summer window.
Between Vlahovic and Cunha. TODAY is a key day for the new Atlético de Madrid striker. Dusan already spoke with Cholo, Matheus is ready and can fly to Madrid at any time. The rojiblancos want to close the matter in the next few hours ?
It’s like some of our supporters want and will the club to do badly just so they can say look how right I wasScenes when:
-Vlahovic signs a new deal
-Lautaro signs a new deal
-Atletico sign Cunha
-Kane goes to City
It’s like some of our supporters want to take the moral high ground for no reason just so they can show how much of a tit they are.It’s like some of our supporters want and will the club to do badly just so they can say look how right I was
And we sign mbappeScenes when:
-Vlahovic signs a new deal
-Lautaro signs a new deal
-Atletico sign Cunha
-Kane goes to City