Because the league is on the verge of kicking the clubs out - and will then blame the clubs for abandoning the league.
Klopps response has been disappointing. As long as him and his players continue to play and not speak about it they are protecting the owners in all of this.
Basically Perez confirms what I said about revenue streams...
Are Sky not going to get TV rights for the new league? I guess not as this is about clubs running their own TV channels or selling rights individually. Me thinks whatever the ins and out of the ESL Sky have a vested interest in stopping it.
The PL has only been around a few years, football existed before and will after. The CL is a new competition replacing the long standing European Cup. Is the ESL just a new development of this?
2018amazed they managed to keep this under wraps tbh. it's clearly been in the pipeline for months, incredible it didn't leak out.
It's not a good idea - that much is abundantly clear. The thing I keep coming back to is the 'why?'. I can see the lure of money, but I've heard from some Spanish outlets, that the very existence of the Madrid and Barca are perilous, and I'd assume the same for the Italian clubs too. That also got me thinking about us & how and why we'd want or need it too and I can only come up with the conclusion that if we didn't take the chance, we too could be in a dire situation. I have no reasoning behind my opinion, apart from a huge dead weight of a stadium that needs paying for, as well as the cost of our complete infrastructure. If the PL was diminished with the expulsion of the clubs in the SL and we declined the invite, then the PL would be a much less financial solution. In essence, we, as well as the other clubs simply can't afford not to be in it.Does anyone actually have any suggestions why this is a good idea except for “sticking it to sky” like I keep seeing, because I cannot
Well no, quite rationally I’ve put forward my own view that a great deal of what people are saying has “killed football” has already been happening for years. I’ve also explained that it isn’t just the 6 PL clubs who are driving this.Do you not understand that this proposal would kill football as we know it? And regardless of if it goes ahead or doesn’t the fall out and ramifications are going to potentially be massive.
These 6 clubs ours included have utterly fucked what was a perfectly fine sport. Yes money was dominating it too much but this closed shop ESL idea goes against everything football is about, if you can’t see that or don’t care about that then I feel sorry for you genuinely.
90% of fans are against it, the 10% are not proper fans of the game and have no care or understanding.
Basically Perez confirms what I said about revenue streams...
UEFA are corrupt, but they don't earn billions. Recently they've actually operated on a small loss, some money might be stifled into peoples pockets, but it's not billions. UEFA is just the collection of footballing associations. Who actually runs UEFA. Members of domestic associations. Including David Gill, who used to run man utd. Until the other day, Angelli was on the executive board of UEFA too, to represent clubs. The super league do not represent clubs they represent very few clubs that have been bullying other clubs as well as UEFA itself to its own demands, to detriment of footballing associations and smaller clubs.All the indignation from Sky is merely about protecting their investment and profits.
Everyone is at it. Same with UEFA, corrupt as hell, they earn billions from the top 6 clubs and all. The pandemic has made these clubs realise actually their revenue streams are really precarious and they've had enough. They want to be in control of their own commercials.
Exactly. Woe is me! Fuck off TinoMaybe if these clubs weren't seriously considering paying a 20-year-old Norwegian £600,000 a week they wouldn't be in bad financial situations.
Maybe if these clubs weren't seriously considering paying a 20-year-old Norwegian £600,000 a week they wouldn't be in bad financial situations.