themanwhofellasleep
z-list internet celebrity
- Dec 14, 2006
- 690
- 0
Over the last few days I've heard lots of football fans talk about "the death of football" or how they are sick to death of the game. It's not just Spurs fans. Lots of football fans seem to be feeling very disillusioned by the game.
Now, I happen to think that the game is alive and well, but I understand their concerns. Personally, I feel an increasing sense of disconnection with Spurs and football in general. Part of this is due to our turnover with players. Irrespective of whether we've improved or not over the last few years, we've gone through a hell of a lot of players. And I find it hard to connect with a club when they players change as often as my underwear (about every six months). Just when I'm used to one set of players, they get shipped out and are replaced by another, newer, more glamorous set of players and I have to start again. And the players we have seem to increasingly players who know nothing about the club and its history. I don't think this is a problem just for Spurs - do you really think Robinho knows what it means to play for Man City? Their traditions and identity? I don't think so. Of course, as long as a player gives his all, who cares if they know about Dave McKay or Danny Blanchflower, but lots of clubs, Spurs included, now seem to bring in players, give them a run-out for a season and then replace them before the fans have gotten the chance to even hear them speak. Do we really think that Modric or Dos Santos grew up wanting to play for Spurs? Of course not. They just know that we're in London, have a decent manager and some money to spend. That's not their fault - I don't know much about teams in Spain or Croatia. But it's still disheartening to watch Berbatov being unveiled for Man Utd, knowing that he saw Spurs as nothing more than a stepping-stone to another club.
It's the same with managers. One of the reasons I loved Martin Jol was that he knew what Spurs were about. He seemed to be an actual fan, and he had a wonderful connection with the fans, and knew the history and traditions of the club. Newcastle fans loved Keegan not just because he nearly won them the league, but because he was "one of them". And the fans felt that he shared the ups and downs with them. Whereas I don't feel any sense of connection at all with Juande. He may or may not be a great manager, but I don't really think of him as Spurs, just as a man doing his job. If another team had come in for him instead of us, he'd be managing them instead.
With Man City, you get the impression that the owners would happily buy the entire Man Utd squad, hire Sir Alex as manager and get the team to play in red if they thought it would bring them success. Never mind that it would destroy the identity of the club and disenfranchise the fans.
In the last few years, we've seen Spurs do relatively well, just missing out on the CL and winning the Carling Cup. I should be happier than ever, but I'm not. I feel more cynical about Spurs now than I did 5 or 10 years ago. I feel quite disconnected for the team. Maybe it's just me, but it's not just about success - it's about identity; it's about knowing who you are cheering for, and knowing that the players and manager understand what it means to play for Spurs - the lows as well as the highs. But when I look at the team and the manager, all I see are professionals being paid to do their job. Maybe that should be enough. I'm not naive - I'd rather have a team of highly-paid, skillful footballers winning the league than a group of loyal, badge-kissing cloggers who can't play but will fight for the cause - and ending up getting relegated.
It's even worse looking at the England team. Has there ever been a time when the English public has felt more cynical and antagonistic about the national team? Does anyone even care whether we beat Andorra and Croatia? Nice though it is to see Jimmy Bullard in the squad, the rest of the players just seem like aloof millionaires more concerned with playing in the Champions League and appearing in Hello magazine than playing for the shirt. Look at Steven Gerrard: as soon as his team had successfully qualified for the Champions League, he chooses to have an operation that means he missed games for England. He could have had the operation over the summer, but that would have meant missing the CL qualifiers - you can see where his priorities lie. Can anyone really get excited cheering on Lampard, knowing that he held his club to ransom for £150,000 a week? Can anyone really love Ferdinand, knowing that he missed a drugs test, was suspended for months and then demanded a pay rise? Can anyone really embrace Capello, with his dire, functional brand of football and reliance on the same overpaid Champions League stars as ever?
Maybe it's just been a tough year. Maybe come May I'll be cheering on Spurs as they win the UEFA Cup and roaring for England as they win games with style. But at the moment it doesn't feel like that. I'm not saying that football is dead, or harking back to an age where players were underpaid and treated like cattle, I'm just feeling like I'm falling out of love with the game.
Now, I happen to think that the game is alive and well, but I understand their concerns. Personally, I feel an increasing sense of disconnection with Spurs and football in general. Part of this is due to our turnover with players. Irrespective of whether we've improved or not over the last few years, we've gone through a hell of a lot of players. And I find it hard to connect with a club when they players change as often as my underwear (about every six months). Just when I'm used to one set of players, they get shipped out and are replaced by another, newer, more glamorous set of players and I have to start again. And the players we have seem to increasingly players who know nothing about the club and its history. I don't think this is a problem just for Spurs - do you really think Robinho knows what it means to play for Man City? Their traditions and identity? I don't think so. Of course, as long as a player gives his all, who cares if they know about Dave McKay or Danny Blanchflower, but lots of clubs, Spurs included, now seem to bring in players, give them a run-out for a season and then replace them before the fans have gotten the chance to even hear them speak. Do we really think that Modric or Dos Santos grew up wanting to play for Spurs? Of course not. They just know that we're in London, have a decent manager and some money to spend. That's not their fault - I don't know much about teams in Spain or Croatia. But it's still disheartening to watch Berbatov being unveiled for Man Utd, knowing that he saw Spurs as nothing more than a stepping-stone to another club.
It's the same with managers. One of the reasons I loved Martin Jol was that he knew what Spurs were about. He seemed to be an actual fan, and he had a wonderful connection with the fans, and knew the history and traditions of the club. Newcastle fans loved Keegan not just because he nearly won them the league, but because he was "one of them". And the fans felt that he shared the ups and downs with them. Whereas I don't feel any sense of connection at all with Juande. He may or may not be a great manager, but I don't really think of him as Spurs, just as a man doing his job. If another team had come in for him instead of us, he'd be managing them instead.
With Man City, you get the impression that the owners would happily buy the entire Man Utd squad, hire Sir Alex as manager and get the team to play in red if they thought it would bring them success. Never mind that it would destroy the identity of the club and disenfranchise the fans.
In the last few years, we've seen Spurs do relatively well, just missing out on the CL and winning the Carling Cup. I should be happier than ever, but I'm not. I feel more cynical about Spurs now than I did 5 or 10 years ago. I feel quite disconnected for the team. Maybe it's just me, but it's not just about success - it's about identity; it's about knowing who you are cheering for, and knowing that the players and manager understand what it means to play for Spurs - the lows as well as the highs. But when I look at the team and the manager, all I see are professionals being paid to do their job. Maybe that should be enough. I'm not naive - I'd rather have a team of highly-paid, skillful footballers winning the league than a group of loyal, badge-kissing cloggers who can't play but will fight for the cause - and ending up getting relegated.
It's even worse looking at the England team. Has there ever been a time when the English public has felt more cynical and antagonistic about the national team? Does anyone even care whether we beat Andorra and Croatia? Nice though it is to see Jimmy Bullard in the squad, the rest of the players just seem like aloof millionaires more concerned with playing in the Champions League and appearing in Hello magazine than playing for the shirt. Look at Steven Gerrard: as soon as his team had successfully qualified for the Champions League, he chooses to have an operation that means he missed games for England. He could have had the operation over the summer, but that would have meant missing the CL qualifiers - you can see where his priorities lie. Can anyone really get excited cheering on Lampard, knowing that he held his club to ransom for £150,000 a week? Can anyone really love Ferdinand, knowing that he missed a drugs test, was suspended for months and then demanded a pay rise? Can anyone really embrace Capello, with his dire, functional brand of football and reliance on the same overpaid Champions League stars as ever?
Maybe it's just been a tough year. Maybe come May I'll be cheering on Spurs as they win the UEFA Cup and roaring for England as they win games with style. But at the moment it doesn't feel like that. I'm not saying that football is dead, or harking back to an age where players were underpaid and treated like cattle, I'm just feeling like I'm falling out of love with the game.