What's new

Fellaini and Hernandez

Shep

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2005
784
940
Agree with it being funny. Fellaini, apart from being injured, is not what we need.

I wouldn't be against Hernandez as we seemed very static up front for the first 70 odd minutes Saturday but we'd need to dump a striker and that doesn't seem likely.
 

Sweech

Ruh Roh Ressegnon
Jun 27, 2013
6,752
16,378
I'm in the minority that I've always been a fan of Fellaini. I think Poch could use him similar to how he used Lambert as a target man if we ever needed to long ball it forwards. Except I guess he'd play behind the striker while we could surround him with more skill guys like Soldado, Eriksen, and Lamela.

Can't see us paying up for either of them though.
 

Barry Mead

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
3,083
4,078
Probably lost for a story to fill up a few column inches, this must have been the one they pulled out of the hat
 

Jamturk

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2008
9,919
23,025
I smell bullshit

but in the event our primary targets fall through

I just want to say

Don't bother Mr Levy :stop:
 

Jimmypearce7

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2005
1,477
2,256
Neither are good enough for Utd or for us. Why would we help Utd by paying £24 million for them? Their value to us is zero.
 

wosH

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
348
820
I fail to see why people rate Chicha. There's absolutely no chance he can play as a lone striker and will only work as a fox in the box with 2 upfront imho.
 
Top