What's new

FIFA Women's World Cup 2019

fluffybunnyuk

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2017
2,210
2,473
usa playing 5 at the back at times. obviously playing for what they have. hope we can break them down and punish them for it.
 

TEESSIDE1

Married, new job and Spurs on the up!
Jul 3, 2006
15,216
19,009
So tight though. I really think we need to go back to giving some benefit to the attacker.

Like they do in cricket, if they give not out for lbw and you appeal, unless it’s dead and buried the umpire won’t over turn the decision.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,165
15,644
So tight though. I really think we need to go back to giving some benefit to the attacker.
How much though? There's got to be a line somewhere. The last defender seems more sensible and much easier to implement - especially at lower levels without VAR - than the last defender +50cm or whatever.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,976
71,400
So tight though. I really think we need to go back to giving some benefit to the attacker.
I also agree with this. She was off but it was very tight and tough to tell. I think it should have stood but I also believe VAR needs to be put back in the trial phase as it's proved to be awful this summer.
 

barry

Bring me Messi
May 22, 2005
6,505
15,345
I'll admit i don't think much of woman's football, and I might never watch another match, but i was excited about today's game...step in the right direction?
 

Ekmek

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2014
1,026
2,523
I don’t know the England squad good enough. Do they have anyone that can replace Scott?
 

SdB

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2013
1,367
1,878
Scott is too slow to be on now.
Speed of an oil tanker but does seem to have football brain which seems to be lacking in most of her teamates

We must surely have a better winger than Parris
 
Top