What's new

Gareth Bale

SambaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2013
422
2,024
Our set up though is far more akin to City than it is Pool. Getting someone to play a De Bruyne role(which is what we are seriously lacking imo) would be easier than changing the way the front three play.
I really think Eriksen can be our De Bruyne, leaving space in the AMs for a bale/martial.

We need to take note of what city have done this year - they've changed the game in the PL.

IMO Eriksen, Dele and Lamela are all capable of playing CM a la De Bruyne/Silva with a defensive mid behind. Freeing up space for Son/Lucas/Bale or Martial in the Sane and Sterling roles.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
I really think Eriksen can be our De Bruyne, leaving space in the AMs for a bale/martial.

We need to take note of what city have done this year - they've changed the game in the PL.

IMO Eriksen, Dele and Lamela are all capable of playing CM a la De Bruyne/Silva with a defensive mid behind. Freeing up space for Son/Lucas/Bale or Martial in the Sane and Sterling roles.

Think we are looking for a gazza or gerrard. Not a stopper but someone who can get the ball and drive forward. With maybe a bit of end product.

Hard to find though.
 

dtxspurs

Welcome to the Good Life
Dec 28, 2017
11,234
46,574
Think we are looking for a gazza or gerrard. Not a stopper but someone who can get the ball and drive forward. With maybe a bit of end product.

Hard to find though.
Dele?

edit: meant that in the case of the 4-3-3 that he and Eriksen could play on either side of a DM.
 

Spursh

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2009
2,558
6,514
I really think Eriksen can be our De Bruyne, leaving space in the AMs for a bale/martial.

We need to take note of what city have done this year - they've changed the game in the PL.

IMO Eriksen, Dele and Lamela are all capable of playing CM a la De Bruyne/Silva with a defensive mid behind. Freeing up space for Son/Lucas/Bale or Martial in the Sane and Sterling roles.

Agree. Eriksen's work rate and tactical awareness make him more than capable of fulfilling that 'De Bruyne role' IMO, and I hope that's the system we try to employ next season as it suits our style and personnel. And in Dele we have someone who can drive forward with the ball, although I believe he needs to improve his ball-retention capabilities, as he relinquishes possession a touch too easy at the moment.

Getting in a holding midfielder capable of moving the ball around quickly and effectively is imperative this summer in order to play this way, however.
 

Luka Van der Bale

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2011
6,041
13,611
Would Bale have won us a trophy this season? That I doubt simply because Poch infuriatingly outright refuses to play his strongest XI in a domestic cup semi final.
Sorry mate this simply isn’t true. He plays the backup keeper and his best outfield side. Just because the Toby scenario was ongoing at the time doesn’t change that fact. At the time, Pochettino didn’t consider Toby part of our best XI.
 

ebzrascal

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2009
2,635
4,670
Guys he is on £350k a week after tax. That means we'd have to pay him about £600k a week just for him to break even.

I suspect RM would need to subsidise the wages or he gets a lump sum payment, probably accept a pay cut also.. This has all happened before with other players leaving high paying clubs.
 
Last edited:

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
I suspect RM would need to subside the wages or he gets a lump sum payment, probably accept a pay cut also.. This has all happened before with other players leaving high paying clubs.

Hmm. A lot of wishful thinking going on here I feel.

Bale taking a small pay cut to play for a club he has emotional ties to is one thing. Taking a cut of £600k to £150k is another. That's quartering you're salary, and even that's only if we're breaking the wage cap for him.

Please don't tell me that if United come in for him for £300k and an offer to take up that vacant RWF slot he's turning it down to come back to us just... because.

Because we know that's what'll happen if it looks like we've wrangled a palatable deal from Madrid and Mourinho gets wind of Bale wanting to come back to the UK.

We're not his boyhood club. He doesn't have any mates in the squad. He probably doesn't even know anyone in the squad. What he has are memories of a time he played bloody well for a team that was ultimately a stepping stone for him, and hence he would undoubtedly regard returning there as a backward step, or at least he would know that's how it would be seen around the world, regardless of how far we've come in the meantime.

United gives him a nice big fat paycheck, a move closer to Wales, and the pretence of a 'sideways' move from Madrid. If he moves, it's a no fucking brainer.

I don't know why we do this to ourselves.
 

ebzrascal

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2009
2,635
4,670
On Bale injury record I notice in the last 3 seasons he has played the following number of matches... not all matches missed would have been injury related but due to competition within the Real Madrid squad. so I expect you could add his availability at 5 more games per season if he was playing at Spurs where he would likely face less rivals for his spot.

I personally think he would be a very effective player and still value for money at £60 million considering the £100 million plus being quoted for other players.

Number of League and cup matches played per season

Bale
2015/16 - 31
2016/17 - 27
2017/18 - 38

M Dembele
2015/16 - 35
2016/17 - 39
2017/18 - 35

Zaha
2015/16 - 43
2016/17 - 37
2017/18 - 29

Kane
2015/16 - 50
2016/17 - 38
2017/18 - 48

Son
2015/16 - 40
2016/17 - 47
2017/18 - 52

Hazard
2015/16 - 43
2016/17 - 43
2017/18 - 51
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,511
330,449
On Bale injury record I notice in the last 3 seasons he has played the following number of matches... not all matches missed would have been injury related but due to competition within the Real Madrid squad. so I expect you could add his availability at 5 more games per season if he was playing at Spurs where he would likely face less rivals for his spot.

I personally think he would be a very effective player and still value for money at £60 million considering the £100 million plus being quoted for other players.

Number of League and cup matches played per season

Bale
2015/16 - 31
2016/17 - 27
2017/18 - 38

M Dembele
2015/16 - 35
2016/17 - 39
2017/18 - 35

Zaha
2015/16 - 43
2016/17 - 37
2017/18 - 29

Kane
2015/16 - 50
2016/17 - 38
2017/18 - 48

Son
2015/16 - 40
2016/17 - 47
2017/18 - 52

Hazard
2015/16 - 43
2016/17 - 43
2017/18 - 51

So a lot less than all of them except Zaha and Dembele who everyone agrees has injury issues. It's also pointless just looking at the numbers in isolation. It matters what the injury is as far as predicting how much they could miss in the future based on the last three seasons. Not an exact science of course, but certainly a good indicator.

Fact is if Dembele didn't already play for us I would certainly be against us signing him based on his injury record.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
So a lot less than all of them except Zaha and Dembele who everyone agrees has injury issues. It's also pointless just looking at the numbers in isolation. It matters what the injury is as far as predicting how much they could miss in the future based on the last three seasons. Not an exact science of course, but certainly a good indicator.

Fact is if Dembele didn't already play for us I would certainly be against us signing him based on his injury record.

Agree with you. But it's bale. There are not many players in the world that could improve our attack but he's one.

I don't think it would happen for loads of reasons. But if it did wow.
 

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
Agree with you. But it's bale. There are not many players in the world that could improve our attack but he's one.

I don't think it would happen for loads of reasons. But if it did wow.

I'd actually disagree with you there. There are several, and almost all of them are far younger, on much lower wages, would cost less in transfer fees, and have a far better injury record. I can think of about 4 or 5 off the top of my head.

Bale only makes sense if he'll take a monstrous pay cut and if we figure the commercial boost will subsidise his transfer fee, which I think is far from a given versus a guy like Pulisic who really would pay for himself.

Then there's the injury record, the drastic loss of form, the fact that he's 28 and will unquestionably lose value even if he does perform for us. I just think it's too much of a risk and that too many of us are viewing this with our hearts rather than our heads.

If he wasn't already a Spurs legend there's no way any of us would think this a great deal.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
I'd actually disagree with you there. There are several, and almost all of them are far younger, on much lower wages, would cost less in transfer fees, and have a far better injury record. I can think of about 4 or 5 off the top of my head.

Bale only makes sense if he'll take a monstrous pay cut and if we figure the commercial boost will subsidise his transfer fee, which I think is far from a given versus a guy like Pulisic who really would pay for himself.

Then there's the injury record, the drastic loss of form, the fact that he's 28 and will unquestionably lose value even if he does perform for us. I just think it's too much of a risk and that too many of us are viewing this with our hearts rather than our heads.

If he wasn't already a Spurs legend there's no way any of us would think this a great deal.

So you are agreeing with me.
 

Spurs' Pipe Dreams

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2011
20,008
32,728
I'd actually disagree with you there. There are several, and almost all of them are far younger, on much lower wages, would cost less in transfer fees, and have a far better injury record. I can think of about 4 or 5 off the top of my head.

Bale only makes sense if he'll take a monstrous pay cut and if we figure the commercial boost will subsidise his transfer fee, which I think is far from a given versus a guy like Pulisic who really would pay for himself.

Then there's the injury record, the drastic loss of form, the fact that he's 28 and will unquestionably lose value even if he does perform for us. I just think it's too much of a risk and that too many of us are viewing this with our hearts rather than our heads.

If he wasn't already a Spurs legend there's no way any of us would think this a great deal.

Bale is in the Neymar bracket, with Lewandowski. please name me these cheaper and younger players you seem are so readily available
 

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
If he wasn't already a Spurs legend there's no way any of us would think this a great deal.
I also fear he'd end up tainting his legacy. The Italians have a saying cavoli riscaldati (reheated cabbage) for how getting back with an old flame is never as good as the first time. Bale would have to be absolutely sensational to recreate the magic from his first spell and it's far more likely that he'd fall short a la Robbie Keane.

Do we really want the taste of microwaved Bale to taint the flavour of "Taxi for Maicon" Bale?
 

coy-spurs1882

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
4,005
10,513
I also fear he'd end up tainting his legacy. The Italians have a saying cavoli riscaldati (reheated cabbage) for how getting back with an old flame is never as good as the first time. Bale would have to be absolutely sensational to recreate the magic from his first spell and it's far more likely that he'd fall short a la Robbie Keane.

Do we really want the taste of microwaved Bale to taint the flavour of "Taxi for Maicon" Bale?
reminds me of the cabbage itk again :banghead::banghead::banghead:
 

Riandor

COB Founder
May 26, 2004
9,418
11,627
...

Nope, pretty sure I'm disagreeing with you.
The Argument here is over "several" and "not many"... because several doesn't scream "lots", thus not many is accurate.

Anyway, enough of that nonsense, Bale improves us and strikes fear into the opposition. Football is as much a game about mentality as anything esle. BUT Money is the determining factor here and likely the reason for this not happening. How anyone cannot want Bale in their team is beyond me, based on all but the money factor.

EDIT: Let me add to this and say, until we know more about any actual valuations etc.. we are only speculating as to how much he will cost and many are assuming it will be too much. We don't know, so to me the Argument should only be, does he fit and who else should we go for/what is each person's valuation of what they think Spurs should pay for Bale (if available and interested).
 
Last edited:

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
Bale is in the Neymar bracket, with Lewandowski. please name me these cheaper and younger players you seem are so readily available

Sorry, but to suggest Bale is in the Neymar bracket is laughable. In wages paid, perhaps.

In terms of quality, Neymar is unquestionably in the top 5 players in the world and has been consistently so for the past 5 years. Bale can't even get in the Real team ahead of Lucas Vazquez. There's a reason they're rumoured to be offloading one and chasing the other.

As for Lewandowski, not sure why he's mentioned as he's in an entirely different position, and even then he's 30 and on the decline.

As for the players that could improve our attack, I mean we're strongly rumoured to be after 2 or 3 right now so it shouldn't be too hard to figure out who I'm talking about.
 
Top