Really hope all this sitting at home in his pants watching Bargain Hunt is worth it for him.
Yep this is his absolute motivation and he won't have a chance of Ballon D'or etc playing in the Europa Conference League.We saw his main motivation on AoN - he wants to be heralded with Messi and Cristiano.
He probably doesn't care about being the greatest goalscorer for Tottenham, but the greatest for England and in the Premier League.
Players who win or are nominated for the Ballon D'or etc are, quite often not the best players, but the best players at the best clubs. He wants the X-Factor, and I don't even think it's about pay or trophies - I think he wants to be on a pedestal, and he'll likely think that he'll get that at City.
Maybe he thinks he can score even more there and break some sort of Messi-type scoring record.
I've got the weirdest feeling that he's gonna end up at Man United...
I said thisHow has he not damaged the Club?
He's damaging the Club's reputation. Are you telling me there's no chance someone like Romero might not look at this situation and be like, "oh, let's reconsider"? Maybe not Romero, but some target might.
At least 5 rival club fans have come up to me all smug laughing about the Kane situation. Is that not damaging?
And financially. Let's say our valuation is 160m. City offer 140m. Kane strikes and continues to. Instead of holding firm, his valuation drops so we can get this over with. Is that not damaging?
He's an utter ****. He hasn't had the balls to put in a transfer request! Why not? Why hasn't he done things officially and through the right channels? If he wants to leave, so be it. But going on strike when he hasn't exhausted all "normal" measures or before City have had a reasonable bid rejected, puts him in Sol Campbell territory IMO.
You do understand what I said there, right? That I DO NOT agree when the poster I replied to said Harry Kane has not damaged the club. Basically, I said he HAS damaged the club.I disagree when you say Harry hasn't damaged the club,
Because you run the risk of keeping a player who becomes extremely disgruntled and worth a lot less than he is now, plus you end up paying his salary.
Let's be honest, given how chunky he was looking last season, he can't really afford too many days off training. He should be keeping extra weight off those delicate cous cous ankles...
Talk about being dramatic.....masterminded a fall of epic proportions ???.Bah, that's not right at all.
Lets get this right. Levy has masterminded a fall of epic proportions. That's one thing. Kane is acting the ****. that's another. These are separate yet very much linked. How Kane is acting is very much down to him. Why the situation has even occurred in the first place is down to Levy. Two separate things. So if sticking the boot into Kane for how he's acting is your thing, that's fine. If rewinding and saying Levy is the architect, surely that's also fine. Doing that isn't ignoring what Kane is doing.
I honestly believe that Kane, a player who has never once rocked the boat and has, up until now shown nothing but the greatest respect and loyalty to the club is acting so against type that there's more to it than being badly advised by his yokel brother. There's something else, fuck knows what but I honestly think there's a lot more to this than we know. There usually is.
Personally I think the progress/ambition/eye off the ball thing, a combination of it all is a large part of it, so yeah, i'll have a pop at Willow about that if that's OK with you all
We saw his main motivation on AoN - he wants to be heralded with Messi and Cristiano.
He probably doesn't care about being the greatest goalscorer for Tottenham, but the greatest for England and in the Premier League.
Players who win or are nominated for the Ballon D'or etc are, quite often not the best players, but the best players at the best clubs. He wants the X-Factor, and I don't even think it's about pay or trophies - I think he wants to be on a pedestal, and he'll likely think that he'll get that at City.
Maybe he thinks he can score even more there and break some sort of Messi-type scoring record.
My son is called Kane .. ffsMy cat is called Kane, ffs
puts him in Sol Campbell territory
Dear A&C, i'm a silly **** and i'm sorryI said this
You do understand what I said there, right? That I DO NOT agree when the poster I replied to said Harry Kane has not damaged the club. Basically, I said he HAS damaged the club.
So, not only were you wrong in the very first line, you doubled down a few more times too
Here, cut and paste this in your reply: Dear A&C, i'm a silly **** and i'm sorry
I'm of the mindset that we should make his life more difficult. Not cave in.
I'd be surprised if his brand is not taking a battering.
Maybe we were blind to how Harry Kane FC he was all along. There's a reason every single other fanbase can't stand him (and that's not just because he scored against them). Harry Claim etc. Maybe we forgave him all that because he's been truly an amazing player for us, and we just assumed he loved the club that he's been with forever and wanted to literally Greaves himself into our history.
Maybe if we look back on his time with us without the Spurs tints, we might see some stuff we were deliberately blind to.
If he's not fit for a game for City, he doesn't get to walk into the team. If he has an off game or doesn't score for an entire month, their fans will demand blood. We're like "it's Harry, of course he'll be OK".
The "Gentleman's Agreement" stuff is also a load of bollocks. You can say there was one, even when there wasn't - no-one can prove it. The same for Bale and Modric.
Also, I expect the agreement was, if there's a decent fee we'll let you go. There's not even been a bid yet has there?
I like to inject some drama into proceedings. It fits nicely in with the codswallop. Others are content with less but the merry go round has to keep turningTalk about being dramatic.....masterminded a fall of epic proportions ???.