- Aug 16, 2018
- 2,507
- 7,901
Is it possible the injury was only a slight ligament strain but the club made it sound worse in order to take the pressure off the player's return to action?
Not really sure why it'd be necessary to do that but if he is back for the second leg then there can't have been 'significant damage' to the ligament. No way would he be back so soon.
Come on, let’s not do this. The 2nd leg is only 9 days away. There’s no way even Kane can go from a “little bit of running inside” to being able to play a part in a CL semi final in 9 days.
You're a doctor?Just some irrelevant doctor giving an opinion who’s never meet Kane in his life. Honestly don’t believe his history had much to do with that injury. I think any player that suffered that impact would have been in trouble. It’s not like these injuries really happen because of an obvious weakness. It’s not like he is running then suddenly goes over on his ankle. Virtually all of them happen from a nasty clash or tackle. The fact he’s back usually after 4-6 weeks shows an operation is not needed and is always a last resort.
Awesome compilation: