Harry Kane

[bat-chain]

We should include this leach in any deal to Man City (although suspect he'll find himself a new club anyway when he realises Spurs isn't all Champions League any more) as well as all other vloggers that clubs seem so keen to bend over for so often these days with access to games proper fans can't get into.

Should be allowed to go if he kicks this bloke in the bollocks on the skywalk, live on Spurs TV.

Kane would do it 100%

 

[Indisguise]

So we let him go for free? Less than he's worth? If City put in a bid of £150mil plus we probably say yes. But they haven't.
We probably said we'd let Kane leave if an acceptable bid came in and it would have been amicable. Acceptable bid hasn't come in though and now Kane is throwing a tantrum

I don't think that Kane deserves being called a "prick" for what he's done for the Club. I honestly don't give a shit about the money we will or won't get for him. Money has fucked the game over completely.

 

[Archibald&Crooks]

A lot of people are confusing his desires and his actions.

Harry can want to leave, that is fine. You can blame a number of people for what led to this. Levy, Poch, Jose, Kane and the players all take some blame for how we have not been successful enough.

His actions are solely at Kanes door, this sint Charlie, the media, City. This is all on Harry, he is turning his back on the club, his team mates, the fans with actions.

This attitude of he deserves better or that it is all down to Levy is wrong. His actions are detestable and lie solely at his door.

There's two parts to this.

Had this been the other way around and i'd posted it, someone would have said it's OK to condemn Kane for what he's done and at the same time blame Levy for his part in it

So.......it's OK to condemn Kane for what he's done and at the same time blame Levy for his part in it

Or something like that........

 

[Doctor Dinkey]

I'd be amazed whatever happens if Kane pulls on a Spurs shirt ever again.
It is a matter of great urgency to the club to bring in a replacement striker. If the club is not actively searching because of some deluded misapprehension that he's going to suddenly become cooperative, then we're going to be struggling with Moura up front for the foreseeable.

 

[Jamturk]

Fucking hell. That's life for fans of most clubs. Look out of your ENIC OUT bubble for two seconds and you'll realise that yourself.

Presumptuous

 

[Maxtremist]

Sport is a competition between people, at the highest level it is between the best, one club putting all of the best players on a team, then it isn't competitive, you have the allusion of a contest, your best shot becomes a bit of luck on the day. That is what the sporting contest is reduced to. The final last year pretty much everyone on here said are best hope was some luck on the day, now that same team that beat us are trying to take our best player by whatever means they can, using morally bankrupt rigged money to do it. Every year that passes it is more of an allusion. The sports governing body have a great deal to answer for, but then again they are probably being paid very well.

I agree with the bolded part. It's a competition between people. Start of the season we will be competing against Man City. They can stack as many decks and cards in their favour and I fully agree that the money and governing boards have allowed teams like City to stack so many decks in their favour that it just seems so far.

But ultimately it will be 11 vs 11 at kick off and we can win. And we can keep on winning. Same with every other team.

The gap between apparent quality and resources levels grows obscenely day to day and the competition and sense of achievement dies, yes. But it's still a sport and it's still competing. Man City will still have to outscore their opponents. And they don't do it every match and they're not 100% guaranteed to do it in any match.

 

[stormfly]

Wow I'm amazed at the views on this thread. I didn't think fans would turn on Harry so quickly. Obviously not turning up yesterday isn't great but it's his career and he's done more than enough for us to deserve a move. Of course in hindsight he shouldn't have signed that last contract but we have gone backwards quite dramatically since then.He's hardly doing a Sol Campbell and running his contract down, this way it ensures we get a proper fee for him. The way we lost Campbell set us back years, he was valued at about 20 million at the time (a fortune back then) and losing him to Arsenal for nothing in the way that it happened put us miles behind them, the swing was massive.

Personally I think the right thing to do is sell him now and use the money to rebuild. We aren't challenging for the league in the next two years and his value will go down massively. 150 million re invested is the best move I think. It's a good time to rebuild and start afresh rather than gradually deteriorate.

Should we sell if City only offer 100m?

 

[Teddy Klinsmann]

What time is Harry due to be setting out the cones at training today?

 

[Nebby]

He's given us his best over and over again and now he wants to leave because the Club has shown fuck-all ambition over the last few years. I say let him go and be gracious about it. That's the least we should do.

If it is true that he has gone on strike, he is now working against Spurs from within. So no, let's not be gracious.

 

[sausage]

I don't think Kane is worth over £100 million any more. He's 28, has dodgy ankles and the world has changed a lot over the last year.

That's the issue then, because the footballing world thinks otherwise. And very few disagree.

If Jack Grealish is worth £100m, and Lukaku is worth more than £100m, then Kane is definitely worth more than £100m.

 

[amathews3416]

If Harry digs in than we must dig in further. City aren’t going to pay what we want and this is strictly a ploy to drop the price into City’s wheel house of what they are wanting to pay. We concede any ground on this and our reputation and ability to hold star players will be forever damaged.

 

[wayneg]

What time is Harry due to be setting out the cones at training today?

He had a gentleman's agreement that he wasn't doing the cones today but setting up the nets.

 

[Aleks]

Harry Kane pulling this shit is actively damaging the club don't some of you understand?

Him protesting is him trying to make us lose millions just so he can get his move

It's very clear man City don't value him at 150+

This is awful and the feelings against Kane are completely justified

 

[Timbo Tottenham]

I don't think Kane is worth over £100 million any more. He's 28, has dodgy ankles and the world has changed a lot over the last year.

I’m loving this trolling tbf.

 

[Indisguise]

Harry Kane pulling this shit is actively damaging the club don't some of you understand?

Him protesting is him trying to make us lose millions just so he can get his move

It's very clear man City don't value him at 150+

This is awful and the feelings against Kane are completely justified

Harry hasn't damaged the Club. Levy's the problem. Get him out after all the shit decisions he's made over the last few years.

 

[Maxtremist]

I don't think that Kane deserves being called a "prick" for what he's done for the Club. I honestly don't give a shit about the money we will or won't get for him. Money has fucked the game over completely.

I never called him a prick so not sure why you mention that to me. I agree with the sentiment though that Kane did a lot for us so that should be remembered.

I disagree that just because he's done good for us we must just let him go with no fuss or anything. We're losing our best player so we want to get a good deal for it.

 

[Drink!Drink!]

This all going to be very divisive.

could we all just agree on one thing.

If/when Kane gets sold for 100+ million, if anyone here seriously posts...haha Danny’s played a blinder, man city you’ve been Levy’d... a huge show-no-mercy ban stick will immediately come down with great vengeance.

 

[sausage]

Could be worse, 8 year old me naively named our goldfish "Sol Campbell" in March 2001

 

[Indisguise]

I never called him a prick so not sure why you mention that to me. I agree with the sentiment though that Kane did a lot for us so that should be remembered.

I disagree that just because he's done good for us we must just let him go with no fuss or anything. We're losing our best player so we want to get a good deal for it.

You didn't call him a prick but someone a few posts above did.

 

[LukaKranjcar]

All well and good saying it’s time to sell him and rebuild, I’d be inclined to agree, but until City pay what he’s worth to us how can we just sell?

The idea of swallowing £50m because Harry has thrown a tantrum is ludicrous.

Its very, very simple here. If City, the richest club in the world, pay what we deem him to be worth, he will get his move. Until that point, what can we do?

Not like City have even made us a fair and concrete proposal is it? £100m doesn’t even get you to the table and I think we’ve made that very clear from the outset.