SlotBadger
({})?
- Jul 24, 2013
- 14,076
- 44,048
You’re a lunaticHarry Kane
- Thread starter RichSpur58
- Start date
You’re a lunatic
Timberwolf
Well-Known Member
- Jan 17, 2008
- 10,328
- 50,217
Yeah I think despite the buzz surrounding the Bayern bid today it will likely settle down again when Bayern realise they need a monster bid to even get Levy to talk to them.
- Kane wont try to force a move after the City debacle
- Bayern won't come anywhere near the asking price
- There's zero noise coming from either Madrid or United
Regardless of all our collective hand-wringing I don't think anything has changed and I think it's v.likely he ends up staying simply because no-one's gonna get remotely close to what Levy wants. And then there's a sizeable chance Kane doesn't even fancy a move to Germany anyway.
Locotoro
Prince of Zamunda
- Sep 2, 2004
- 9,452
- 14,214
Are you Charlie in disguise
Richard Howlett
Member
- Jun 3, 2012
- 33
- 51
80m plus Mane... though do we earn more in PL revenue for one more seaon and a chance of a trophy? 80m pays for Maddison and two CBs. With Son and Richarson injury issues another forward will be needed.
McFlash
In the corner, eating crayons.
- Oct 19, 2005
- 12,990
- 46,596
I swear he lives under a bridge.
Joshua shepherd
Well-Known Member
- Jan 31, 2013
- 1,354
- 3,364
I don’t disagree, however, given that he’s one of only a couple of things we’ve had to be proud of in the past few years as spurs fans, I’d much rather see him wear the shirt for one last season.
Hopefully this season goes better than the last and we can give him a proper send off rather than that disgrace after the Brentford game.
Tractorspur
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 347
- 2,197
And Lamela to an extent but spending it on 5 players didn’t work
SamR
Well-Known Member
- Jan 31, 2006
- 1,214
- 2,440
My opinion might not be shared but I really don’t care about his transfer value. Why do we even care about the money side of things?
We can raise cash from actual deadwood that aren’t good enough and we’ve got one of the strongest commerical models in the business.
Harry Kane is a pleasure to watch, our best player by a mile and we’re kidding ourselves if we think we can improve this season by letting him go.
We can raise cash from actual deadwood that aren’t good enough and we’ve got one of the strongest commerical models in the business.
Harry Kane is a pleasure to watch, our best player by a mile and we’re kidding ourselves if we think we can improve this season by letting him go.
The disrespect to Nacer 'the Dolphin' Chadli
SlotBadger
({})?
- Jul 24, 2013
- 14,076
- 44,048
Eriksen > Lamela > Chadli were hits. The others? Nah…
HobbitSpur
The Voice of Reason
- Jun 28, 2013
- 1,785
- 3,818
“A Tad more tried and tested”??
They are absolutely perfect additions. We are looking to rebuild a squad and a mentality double quick.
Jota and Kyago have successfully and physically lived through the journey Ange took Celtic through. They would be such an addition to the squad.
Joshua shepherd
Well-Known Member
- Jan 31, 2013
- 1,354
- 3,364
There’s every chance they wouldn’t be though. Nobody’s saying they wouldn’t be good additions, just that if we were to replace Kane with those two specific players it would be a ridiculous downgrade overall.
mil1lion
This is the place to be
- May 7, 2004
- 42,675
- 78,523
Our biggest issue is we have enough key changes to make this window without selling Kane. We need to get those deals done and transition our style of play. It's going to be a hell of a lot easier for Ange if he has Kane. I would seriously worry for him if he loses Kane for his first season. It could go the way of Ramos after losing Keane and Berbatov. Keep him now and transition this negative football we've been playing. Then when we lose Kane it will not be as impactful because we may actually learn how to function as an attacking unit. Similar to how we handles Kanes injuries under Poch, there were even some mad posters suggesting we drop him at the time. Use this season to transition and then next summer focus most of our transfer strategy on a new striker (also give Scarlett another good loan as he could be a good attacking player for next season). I also think Kane is more than happy to help get us back on track before he leaves.
CantSmileWithoutYou
Well-Endowed Member
- May 20, 2015
- 3,891
- 15,530
One question.
Who's going to score against Arsenal next year, with no Kane?
Who's going to score against Arsenal next year, with no Kane?
HobbitSpur
The Voice of Reason
- Jun 28, 2013
- 1,785
- 3,818
Perhaps Kane really wants to stay. But he does want to win trophies and although his preference would be to win them at Spurs, Levy has made so many promises to him about “building a team around him” and not delivered that Kane’s hand is being forced.
Perhaps with all the change that is happening now he wants to be sure he is making the right decision before jumping ship.
Who knows apart from Harry himself.
Bluto Blutarsky
Well-Known Member
- Mar 4, 2021
- 15,289
- 71,138
Kane has always said he would stay at Spurs as long as the club shared his ambitions. Since the ill-fated Neville interview, Spurs have gone backwards and are now on their 4th manager. I can’t see any scenario where Kane now thinks Spurs are showing ambition.
KaneOne question.
Who's going to score against Arsenal next year, with no Kane?
HobbitSpur
The Voice of Reason
- Jun 28, 2013
- 1,785
- 3,818
Where did I say that these would be the perfect replacement for Kane?
Joshua shepherd
Well-Known Member
- Jan 31, 2013
- 1,354
- 3,364
You didn’t but it was part of the original point made by whoever mentioned them first.
