- Jan 20, 2006
- 45,213
- 8,229
Wot? No poll?
Is this seriously a thread? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahahhahahahahhaaahahhahahahahhhah the OP you're a mug
maybe we could open this thread up to a slightly wider debate and ask if Adebayor is actually any better than Crouch
I posted this on the ratings thread after I had described Parker as 'limited'
I think that that would be a fair definition of 'limited'
Your words 'jack of all trades; master of none'
He is one paced; one footed; cannot turn on the ball; rarely makes an incisive pass; his tackling is Palaciosotic at times.
Does have good positional discipline and plays the short return pass well.
He is a decent stop gap and for a first game did well yesterday.
A journeyman footballer which makes him 'limited' to me.
He may indeed be what we need for the time being with the transfer of Palacios and the unavailability of Sandro and until we can sign a genuinely quality player.
The Footballer of the Year claim by the 'Football Writers is a joke award. Most of us spend the year bemoaning the rubbish that they write.
England mainly by default and only just.
That doessn't make O'Hara better though I agree,
But he is more mobile, has a better shot, delivers a good dead ball
and has more 'vision' about the game.
He also does not have a side parting.
He has been a great signing... Made me laugh yesterday when the commentators claimed that Liverppol struggled due to bedding in four new players when we were doing exactly the same with Friedel, Walker, Parker and Adebayor
SAid it all before. There'll be a lto of humble pie on here regards Parker. His workrate, drive, determination are something we dnt often see in a Spurs jersey.
Early days, but Parker and Modric, complimented by Sandro on his return, could be the best midfield partnership we have had for many a year.
Adam, Downing and Henderson's claim to fame is that they are used to fighting relegation battles, not challenging for titles. It's nothing to do with bedding in, more like the're out of their depth and shown to be inferior.
These guy cost a combined £50m, which if you consider Parker at £5m, Bale at £5m, Krancjar at £2m and Modric at £16m, illustrates what a terrible waste of money commited by the bin dippers. A waste, but rather amusing.
So what you are trying to say then is that Commolli is being shown up again for what he really is? ;-)