- Sep 10, 2011
- 764
- 4,887
I agree Maddison is the tried and tested player alot of people want as he's done it in the league already but he's so far away from being a "Conte" type player. Zaniolo on the other hand is basically what you would describe a Conte attacking player to be.Shame. I'd rather him than either of our supposed preferred options.
Apart from Maddisons set piece skills I think I prefer Zaniolo, mainly because he fits out style much better than maddison does.
Alot of talk about creativity or the lack of. But when you actually look back on the amount of goals we scored and out xg in the final run in we didn't exactly struggle for goals did we? The patterns of play Conte has drilled in creates more than enough chances.
The games we struggled in I think were more to do with nerves and fighting the mental battle than actually not being able to create chances naturally.