Rocksuperstar
Isn't this fun? Isn't fun the best thing to have?
- Jun 6, 2005
- 53,378
- 67,031
John Terry - what a nice guy!
- Thread starter BoringOldFan
- Start date
paul_1979yid
Mr Tumble
- Dec 1, 2006
- 3,376
- 2
He only had one thing on his mind.....Cashleys bum and wanted to get home to be with him.......
Form an orderly que to punch him....................
Form an orderly que to punch him....................
Lilywhite_Bixo
New Member
- Sep 12, 2007
- 184
- 0
Would love to take credit for the fjords, but those are in Norway... and Dougal, you do know that the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy aint for real right? :razz:
Lilywhite_Bixo
New Member
- Sep 12, 2007
- 184
- 0
Hmm, goes of and sticks my thumb up in the air, with a towel stuffed in my pocket to see if you might be right..
ray:couldnt agree more you took the words right out of my mouth lol
anyone who knows me, knows i hate john terry arrogant no talented n overhyped peice of shit, 60 pound fine dont mean nothin when you earn 140k a week, all those petty fines get thrown on the accountants desk and done with.
- May 26, 2004
- 13,415
- 576
- Staff
- #28
Totally agree.
Rupstoh
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2006
- 3,649
- 456
When I leave this green and pleasant land, I am going to come back as a pigeon and permanently shit on the bonnet of John Terry's car.
I will fly off every now and then, eat loads of bread from Russian tourists, and then put so much acidic crap on his car it will become a write-off. I will do this on a permanent basis.
I cannot wait.
I will fly off every now and then, eat loads of bread from Russian tourists, and then put so much acidic crap on his car it will become a write-off. I will do this on a permanent basis.
I cannot wait.
General Levy
Banned
- Jun 7, 2007
- 4,295
- 9
Are you serious?
Flatters
Racist Troll
- May 4, 2005
- 27,001
- 50
I wasn't actually into football when Campbell left us, so that helps.
Taken from F365. tosser
The Chelsea skipper is in favour of a law being implemented which would only allow team captains to discuss contentious decisions with referees.
The concept has long been muted, but in the wake of blatant showings of a lack of respect from Ashely Cole and Javier Mascherano in the last few weeks it would appear that urgent action is now required.
"I do agree there has to be a line drawn and confronting the referee has to be taken out of the game," Terry said.
"I think we have to give it a go and if it doesn't work then the FA and the officials have to say that. But we have to try these things."
Terry was criticised in the aftermath of the Blues' recent 4-4 draw with Tottenham for quickly surrounding referee Mike Riley following Cole's rash challenge on Spurs full-back Alan Hutton.
The England defender insists that he was not harassing the official though and was merely advising Riley to ignore the protests of an irate Tottenham bench.
"I saw their bench jump up and I ran forward to tell Mike Riley not to listen or be intimidated by their bench trying to force him into a decision," explained Terry.
"I spoke to him and he told me 'It was a high tackle and it was going to be a booking', I agreed and walked away.
"There was no argument from me or anyone else close to Mike Riley and I thought he handled it fantastically well.
"Us players have got to set an example to the younger kids playing the game and people watching. But it is a natural reaction when a tackle is made. The fans show their frustration and whistle at the referee and the players have that same reaction because we are all so passionate about the game.
"It is a case of Chelsea appealing for what they feel is right at the time on the pitch. The club have spoken to the players and the manager about it but at the moment we don't feel we are doing it any more than any other club."
Former referee David Elleray has also given his backing to any plans to give club captains sole responsibility for speaking with match officials.
"We would be happy to go along with it certainly," he said.
"What we don't want is to ban players from ever speaking to a referee during a game because communication is very important. But in terms of major decisions, I think we need to.
"There is a natural reaction among lots of players that when something happens, they all get involved and therefore by trying to change that by saying only the captain can speak to the referee, as long as it doesn't give the captain licence to abuse and disrespect the referee, I think we may then begin to challenge this natural reaction of players."
The FA's director of football development, Sir Trevor Brooking, is keen to see the idea implemented, but has warned that the governing body must do their utmost to ensure that the new rule is adhered to at all times.
"The key is what, at the start of next season, can the professional game make sure they adhere to?" he said.
"It is no good doing something only to have several incidents two weeks later of everyone breaking the code they decided to put in place."
The Chelsea skipper is in favour of a law being implemented which would only allow team captains to discuss contentious decisions with referees.
The concept has long been muted, but in the wake of blatant showings of a lack of respect from Ashely Cole and Javier Mascherano in the last few weeks it would appear that urgent action is now required.
"I do agree there has to be a line drawn and confronting the referee has to be taken out of the game," Terry said.
"I think we have to give it a go and if it doesn't work then the FA and the officials have to say that. But we have to try these things."
Terry was criticised in the aftermath of the Blues' recent 4-4 draw with Tottenham for quickly surrounding referee Mike Riley following Cole's rash challenge on Spurs full-back Alan Hutton.
The England defender insists that he was not harassing the official though and was merely advising Riley to ignore the protests of an irate Tottenham bench.
"I saw their bench jump up and I ran forward to tell Mike Riley not to listen or be intimidated by their bench trying to force him into a decision," explained Terry.
"I spoke to him and he told me 'It was a high tackle and it was going to be a booking', I agreed and walked away.
"There was no argument from me or anyone else close to Mike Riley and I thought he handled it fantastically well.
"Us players have got to set an example to the younger kids playing the game and people watching. But it is a natural reaction when a tackle is made. The fans show their frustration and whistle at the referee and the players have that same reaction because we are all so passionate about the game.
"It is a case of Chelsea appealing for what they feel is right at the time on the pitch. The club have spoken to the players and the manager about it but at the moment we don't feel we are doing it any more than any other club."
Former referee David Elleray has also given his backing to any plans to give club captains sole responsibility for speaking with match officials.
"We would be happy to go along with it certainly," he said.
"What we don't want is to ban players from ever speaking to a referee during a game because communication is very important. But in terms of major decisions, I think we need to.
"There is a natural reaction among lots of players that when something happens, they all get involved and therefore by trying to change that by saying only the captain can speak to the referee, as long as it doesn't give the captain licence to abuse and disrespect the referee, I think we may then begin to challenge this natural reaction of players."
The FA's director of football development, Sir Trevor Brooking, is keen to see the idea implemented, but has warned that the governing body must do their utmost to ensure that the new rule is adhered to at all times.
"The key is what, at the start of next season, can the professional game make sure they adhere to?" he said.
"It is no good doing something only to have several incidents two weeks later of everyone breaking the code they decided to put in place."
Rocksuperstar
Isn't this fun? Isn't fun the best thing to have?
- Jun 6, 2005
- 53,378
- 67,031
"It is a case of Chelsea appealing for what they feel is right at the time on the pitch. The club have spoken to the players and the manager about it but at the moment we don't feel we are doing it any more than any other club."
:lol: Well, John - mind if i call you John? - You're wrong about not doing it more than any other club as i've not seen it happen as often, or in as many unwarranted situations, or in such numbers, as the Chelsea players do. Man Utd probably come a close second and, though it pains me to say it, the Woolwich players have calmed their protests massively in the last 18 months - maybe that's because they've stopped expecting preferential treatment from officials where the blue lot haven't, but it's noticeable.
What SHOULD happen is, when the whistle is blown everyone STANDS THE F*CK STILL, not run 25-30 yards to get into the refs face, just to try and tell him what he already knows. Running to the ref to tell him to not be influenced by the bench - what's to stop one of our guys charging over and telling the ref not to be influenced by JT? Nothing, except JT doesn't see it that way around - as far as he's concerned, Riley was going to be swayed so felt he had to tell the ref his job - JT, personally i'd find that far more insulting than a teams bench having to watch their new RB get hacked down in a dirty, dangerous challenge then witness his "captain" trying to hassle the ref when maybe he should've been having a word with the arrogant **** who committed the foul in the first place. Priorities and responsibilities, JT - two words you need to learn.
:lol: Well, John - mind if i call you John? - You're wrong about not doing it more than any other club as i've not seen it happen as often, or in as many unwarranted situations, or in such numbers, as the Chelsea players do. Man Utd probably come a close second and, though it pains me to say it, the Woolwich players have calmed their protests massively in the last 18 months - maybe that's because they've stopped expecting preferential treatment from officials where the blue lot haven't, but it's noticeable.
What SHOULD happen is, when the whistle is blown everyone STANDS THE F*CK STILL, not run 25-30 yards to get into the refs face, just to try and tell him what he already knows. Running to the ref to tell him to not be influenced by the bench - what's to stop one of our guys charging over and telling the ref not to be influenced by JT? Nothing, except JT doesn't see it that way around - as far as he's concerned, Riley was going to be swayed so felt he had to tell the ref his job - JT, personally i'd find that far more insulting than a teams bench having to watch their new RB get hacked down in a dirty, dangerous challenge then witness his "captain" trying to hassle the ref when maybe he should've been having a word with the arrogant **** who committed the foul in the first place. Priorities and responsibilities, JT - two words you need to learn.
L.A. Yiddo
Not in L.A.
- Apr 12, 2007
- 5,640
- 8,053
Read the story at the bottom of this thread:-
http://laspurs.com/YAF/default.aspx?g=posts&t=46
WANKER
http://laspurs.com/YAF/default.aspx?g=posts&t=46
WANKER
Bonjour
Señor Member
- Dec 1, 2003
- 11,931
- 30
