What's new

Jose vs Conte - who did a better job for us?

Who did a better job for us?


  • Total voters
    305

TOLBINY

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2019
1,219
2,801
Conte has spoken "I decided we should part ways with Tottenham. Some had decided to settle for less."

Some of the owners, some of the players and, judging by comments on SC, some of the fans as well.
 

lobob8

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
681
2,418
Seeing as this has been bumped, for me it's Jose by a mile. Like him much more as a person, got us to a cup final, should have been given more time and backing. Conte sabotaged himself this past year and dragged everyone through the mud.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,265
47,349
Conte has spoken "I decided we should part ways with Tottenham. Some had decided to settle for less."

Some of the owners, some of the players and, judging by comments on SC, some of the fans as well.
The fans hasn't settled for less at all
 

mabolsa_ritchey

aka Hugh G Rection
Oct 23, 2005
1,419
1,569
Tough one. While I absolutely despised the football we served under both of them my current annoyance at Conte probably outweighs what I remember of the Mourinho time.
Rose tinted glasses and all that, but i remember Mourinho having an absolute shocking set of players to work with and even got a bit of a tune out of Ndombele. Neither one was backed with the players they actually wanted, but the players Conte got in are arguably better overall than Mourinho got. Yet we’ve come out of Contes reign into one of our most depressing periods since the 90s. Also Conte didn’t improve a single player. Actually now I’m really thinking about it I do think he’s an absolute charlatan.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,390
147,014
Conte got us CL football so in that regard it’s him isn’t it. But I do feel Jose got dealt a real bum hand. We lost all our strikers to injury early on in his time here for the first season. Then covid hit and screwed everything up. So it’s really hard to tell how he would have done here given a normal season or indeed a fit squad.

Bottom line though, they were both poor fits. And both played a huge part in their own downfall.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,179
79,738
Jose did less. Maybe he promoted more youth but we had a 2 month decent spell under him without it meaning much.

Cant forget that Zagreb result.

The league cup final is a funny one.

Other than beating Lampards Chelsea on pens, we scraped past Stoke and Brentford. Got a bye first round as well.

Conte gave us a better run and achievement (4th). We looked a more complete unit under him for a period.

But Conte did more damage toward the end as he especially set fire to everything whereas Jose just kinda waited for his p45 whilst going out with a cup final win.
 

Athenspur

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
1,994
4,240
Conte gave us a very good season and champions league before it all went wrong. Mourinho sent us back to the middle ages.
 
Last edited:

g_harry

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,940
4,636
Have to laugh at our fans majority happy to turf Poch out the door. Now that majority crying why club didn't contact him before Chelsea. All Conte haters on about all boring football, not too many saying that when we smashed Arsenal at home to get pole position for fourth. Fickle bunch.

Always the managers fault at Spurs isn't it.
 

mano-obe

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,290
7,561
We were in blistering form with Jose at one point. I thought we may actually make a challenge for the league then he reverted to type and bring the shite defensive football to our team. Not to mention dicking around with Bale and setting us back more. I feel he could have done a lot better if he let us play

Conte was a big crybaby. Always threatening to quit if he didn't get his way. He was just like Jose in so many ways

Both were let downs, playing defensive football without the players to do it.

I've never minded losing with Spurs, it's part of the game. There is nothing worse than playing shite and losing. Losing and playing well doesn't irk me as much.

Jose could sit on a 1-0 lead for 89 minutes and still lose

Conte could be 1-0 down after 3 minutes then only decide to play in the 85th minute, equalize then lose.
 

Frank Blank

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2007
1,882
3,314
Tough one. While I absolutely despised the football we served under both of them my current annoyance at Conte probably outweighs what I remember of the Mourinho time.
Rose tinted glasses and all that, but i remember Mourinho having an absolute shocking set of players to work with and even got a bit of a tune out of Ndombele. Neither one was backed with the players they actually wanted, but the players Conte got in are arguably better overall than Mourinho got. Yet we’ve come out of Contes reign into one of our most depressing periods since the 90s. Also Conte didn’t improve a single player. Actually now I’m really thinking about it I do think he’s an absolute charlatan.

And therein lies the rub. I hated Conte's dull football, but bringing in Kulu and most certainly Bentancur, will leave a far longer legacy than 'The Chosen One' or whatever the fuck he refers to himself nowadays.
 

Rout-Ledge

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2005
9,638
21,825
We were in blistering form with Jose at one point. I thought we may actually make a challenge for the league then he reverted to type and bring the shite defensive football to our team.
I think you might be misremembering. We were never in blistering form under Jose. We had a couple of good weeks, I think, including the 1-6 against United which was easily his best moment for us. It unravelled in (from memory) the very next game against West Ham where we threw away a three goal lead. We had a couple of good park the bus wins against city and arsenal but that wasn’t really blistering form…
 

freeeki

Arsehole.
Aug 5, 2008
11,840
69,469
Too hard to compare, for me.

I think things would have been different for Jose if it wasn't for covid, and for being sacked before a cup final.

In that regard I'd say he took us further than Conte did.

But their tenures aren't comparable.
 

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
I think Conte's first season still easily trumps anything Jose did. People say Jose had a bad team, but the team Conte inherited was also pretty bad - the only real improvement in the first 11 he took over was Romero and he had to reshape the team mid-season and make it into a winning machine, with only 2 (very good) signings in Jan. I think the job he did in that 6-7 month period was actually pretty damn remarkable given how fucking terrible and disjointed we were under Nuno and Jose at the end of the previous season.

I also think Conte's 2nd season was worse than anything Jose did. Spent a ton of money on some decent, talented players and somehow managed to make the team worse with his rigid tactics, inability or unwillingness to adapt, his negative comments about the club...just shit all round.
 

Styopa

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2014
5,353
14,822
Have to laugh at our fans majority happy to turf Poch out the door. Now that majority crying why club didn't contact him before Chelsea. All Conte haters on about all boring football, not too many saying that when we smashed Arsenal at home to get pole position for fourth. Fickle bunch.

Always the managers fault at Spurs isn't it.

I'm not sure what your issue is here.

I think most sensible fans thought Pochettino did a great job at Spurs, but the project ran out of steam by the end. That's not uncommon, though. Very few managers last over a few years at a club. Pochettino was one of the longest-serving managers in the league by the time we sacked him.

I also think most people thought Conte did a good job in leading us to the fourth and don't dispute that we were in very good - even excellent- form during the last two or three months of the season. Particularly from the end of Feb 22 to the end of May 22. But the wheels quickly came off, and some of the football we played this year was atrocious. In the end, we seemed to get worse the longer he was in the job.

There's nothing fickle about any of that.
 
Last edited:

Oscar22

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2004
16,867
15,465
Personally I enjoyed things a bit more under Jose, I feel like he was more positive about the club, and for most of the time at least acted like he was interested in being here. He had a massive injury hit at one point and actually navigated that really well considering we weee missing our only real world class players.

We actually got to see some youth players, Tanganga got games, even Parrott popped up at one point but in the most part he would at least play these types of squad players. I thought it was harsh to boot him literally just before the cup final - I’d also be interested to see the result of the poll had he managed to ‘Jose’ us a win in that, him actually winning something and whether that trumps making fourth for some people.

I think Conte did well to get us fourth and we played some decent stuff in that run, however for me this is basically equal to the feeling of just how poor this season has been. This season the amount of games we set out with basically no will to win or to even try and attack is ridiculous. Under Jose we didn’t have anything pretty, and we didn’t have unique patterns of play, which leads to people say we relied solely on Kane and Son but to be honest, even doing that is at least a way to try and win a game even if it an not always pretty.

This season it’s felt like our tactics are defend, defend a bit more and then when we find we’re a few goals down let someone cross the half way line and we’ll see if we can salvage a draw. That home game Vs Milan did me to be honest, it was like we decided that we were happy to go out as long as we didn’t get beat by too many - I actually turned that game off in disgust near the end.

Bizarre to read the posts above where is beating United 6-1 away is due to them having a bad pre-season, and I think that’s where the “clearly bias” comment that was made in relation to those comments likely came from.

I don’t think either of them suit where we are as a club, and I wouldn’t have either of them back, I don’t think either are particularly nice in terms of personality but if I had to choose, I’d go for Jose, simply because Conte walking around telling everyone they’re shit, this is shit, that’s shit, and acting like we’re lucky he ever graced us with his presence, all whilst his turgid, boring, weak minded football stunk the place out was much harder to put up with for me personally.

Anyways, let’s hope Ange gives us some character and feel good back 💪
 

PLTuck

Eternal Optimist
Aug 22, 2006
15,978
33,214
Mourinho didn't talk the club down at every opportunity and got us to a cup final. Hands down better for the club as a whole than Conte.

Both were divisive characters who would allegedly stir up conflict in the dressing room to provide motivation and played horrible football so I never want to see either of them at the club again.
 

Rout-Ledge

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2005
9,638
21,825
Conte’s time here really made me grow to dislike him as a manager, in many respects. Utterly selfish and had absolutely no consideration for the club itself. Made a shitload of cash out of us though, and was on self-preservation overdrive for most of his time here. He couldn’t care less that he left us in turmoil. Bad egg.

He did an objectively better job here than Jose though, results wise.
 

mattstev2000

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2007
2,787
5,529
Conte has spoken "I decided we should part ways with Tottenham. Some had decided to settle for less."

Some of the owners, some of the players and, judging by comments on SC, some of the fans as well.

Massively under performs, produces boring football, get's knocked out of all the cups by opposition we should comfortably be beating even with our squad deficiencies, publicly denigrates everyone at the club except himself and then says he decided to part ways and some had decided to settle for less.

He seems to be in full on denial. There was plenty of blame to go around, himself very much included.
 

Frank Blank

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2007
1,882
3,314
I'm not sure what your issue is here.

I think most sensible fans thought Pochettino did a great job at Spurs, but the project ran out of steam by the end. That's not uncommon, though. Very few managers last over a few years at a club. Pochettino was one of the longest-serving managers in the league by the time we sacked him.

I also think most people thought Conte did a good job in leading us to the fourth and don't dispute that we were in very good - even excellent- form during the last two or three months of the season. Particularly from the end of Feb 22 to the end of May 22. But the wheels quickly came off, and some of the football we played this year was atrocious. In the end, we seemed to get worse the longer he was in the job.

There's nothing fickle about any of that.

Closer to the truth was that Dembele ran out of steam. His importance to the team at the time was not to be underestimated.

Yes, Poch deserves a lot of credit for what he did; but his job was made that much easier by having Dembele in the team.
 

Wiener

SC Supporter
Jun 24, 2005
1,194
321
Both were completely wrong for us but I guess they were chosen because they had a good record of getting results.

I voted for Conte as I think he was doing a better job until the moment he lost interest, which I think was around the time of the World Cup. We were well on track for a top four finish until Conte pulled the rug from under us, and of course himself but strangely he managed to stay upright.

Both are graceless, petulant and, at times, remarkably unprofessional and I am glad we are rid of them.

Looking forward to Ange's no bullshit attacking approach to football, and probably everything else.
 
Top