- Oct 25, 2004
- 2,038
- 1,239
Walcot IS better technically (if we're to assume everyone is using the term in the same way). But thats not the whole picture. Lennon is blockbuster at the minute. Bums on seats and delivivers the goods. Quentin Tarrantino... Walcot might very well be Orson Wells in comparison but who the fuck would chose to watch Citizen Kane over Pulp fiction? some gooners might but they would do it despite themselves and pretend till thier dying day it was fun... i daresay when asked what they thought of pulp fiction they would reply "i didn't not see it"
Lennon/becks/milner/joe cole should and will be Capellos wide options for the WC. Walcott will go becasue he could cover CF and wing.
I would - I fell asleep during the recent rescreening of Pulp Fiction. Citizen Kane is widely thought of as being the greatest Hollywood film of all time. Interestingly, neither Pulp Fiction nor Citizen Kane won the Oscar for best picture. In fact they both one a single Oscar for best screenplay.