- Jul 22, 2008
- 43,881
- 95,149
Which is exactly the point, isn't it
In Modric's first I'm a Chavski 'Ho interview (you know, guys, the one where it was obvious he ahd been coached), he specifically referenced the BerbaGit deal when he said "Spurs sell their best players...it's normal" (or words to that effect - it's the last part I remember clearly). It was obvious that chelsea were using the BerbaGit smash-and-grab as their blueprint. Nearly every media commentator mentioned BerbaGit almost every time they discussed the Modric situation.
Levy has drawn a line the sand, this Summer. I, for one, think it is an excellent aspect of our transfer window dealings.
Couldn't agree more. It was never about how much money Chelsea offered. To a lesser extent it wasn't even about how important Modric is for the team.
It was entirely to do with how the club want to be perceived. As a club that continue to sell their best players whenever a fat cheque is waved in front of them? Or a club that makes a statement to the players, the fans, and the other teams, that we're building a side in order to compete and win.
Bale, VDV, Sandro and others may have had sympathy with Modric, but I'm sure they are all pleased he's staying, and impressed with Levy for sticking to his guns.
Off topic slightly, but if we ever do sell Modric in the future, I hope Levy makes a point of refusing to sell him to Chelsea.