- Dec 27, 2004
- 23,186
- 30,349
Better for it to happen 11 games in than with 3 to go..
True but its still 3 points to play for
Better for it to happen 11 games in than with 3 to go..
true but we had spells like that against Arsenal and United and readjusted to finish stronger.There's been a lot of talk about how we were miles better than Chelsea before the sending off and we definitely would have won if it remained 11 against 11. I'm not sure I agree. After the disallowed Son goal we began to get very sloppy and they started to get a grip on midfield. We were making mistakes under pressure and those mistakes led to the penalty. I thought they were already beginning to get on top when Romero went.
I don't think the narrative of 'we only lost because of the sending offs' is especially helpful. We need to realise our shortcomings and improve them if we're going to challenge for top 4.
I’ve never been prouder of a 4-1 defeat before. That can’t be a bad thing. I’m feeling pretty down about our chances today but that’s more to do with the nasty injury to VDV than anything to do with how we played. We deserved a draw last night and the players played their hearts out for us.Pragmatism be damned. I’ll take I'm a hipster ball all day long. And the comparisons with Ossie’s team are ludicrous, as this team has excellent defensive foundations. Bring on Wolves. Haven’t been this enthused by Spurs since… forever. This is better than Poch.
Man City 4-3 was our best loss ever.Strangely, this is the best I've felt after any Spurs loss, EVER. Full credit to Ange. What hurts the most is VDV going off with such a bad looking hammy (and it hurts because we would have won if he stayed on lol)
Why do people always find a negative to spin?Only a combination of superb heroics from Vacario and poor finishing from the opposition saved us from a real drubbing. Would you still feel the same about Anges brave tactics had we shipped 8 or 9 goals?
Weren’t you the one banging on about keeping Conte when it was absolutely crystal clear that he was mentally checked out back in March? Glutton for shit football?Only a combination of superb heroics from Vacario and poor finishing from the opposition saved us from a real drubbing. Would you still feel the same about Anges brave tactics had we shipped 8 or 9 goals?
How does he always know what to say and how to say it.
Only a combination of superb heroics from Vacario and poor finishing from the opposition saved us from a real drubbing. Would you still feel the same about Anges brave tactics had we shipped 8 or 9 goals?
Beni lad, read the post by spursfan77 below your post.Fair play to Ange in sticking to his principals, and I’m proud of him the players for their showing for that, but for me the tactics were wrong. Fair enough at 10 men maybe, but not when going down to 9 to play such a high line, particularly when none of our defence has any pace. Not saying to go all out defensive, but think a happy medium mid block setup would have been better.
Yeah we had chances to score, but these were not down to the high line we deployed and if we did score, it was always inevitable Chelsea would break that line sooner or later and only due to Vicario, great heroic defending and poor finishing it was kept to just 4.
Loving the football we have played up until now, and want that style to continue, but doesn’t mean I think last night was right tactics to be deployed.
Big test coming up with the players out and whether we still play a high line, as it could end up as a car crash and out unbeaten 10 games could easily turn into 2-3 loses on the trot.
I trust Ange to get it right though and believe in him.