- Jan 17, 2009
- 5,734
- 11,341
Amazing that son starts. Aurier over doherty?
It will avoid another dodgy handball penalty decision. On the flip side, more likely Aurier will take someone out in the box for a stonewaler!
Amazing that son starts. Aurier over doherty?
I really like that front 3 if we had Gio instead of Sissoko I would be really pleased with the team.Love that Lamela gets a start after his last few efforts.
A little worried we’ve gone with Sissoko and Aurier.
GLC a big miss for me also. He has begun hugely influential.
I guess this is what we have to expect though, whilst we try and juggle a game every 2 or 3 days
It was probably just a lot more mild then it was made out.So the injury to Son was a Con?
So the injury to Son was a Con?
Side looks a bit dodgy to me with plenty of potential to give away Pen's, but we'll see!
Anyone think Jose will park the bus and trying hitting them on the counter instead of using fullbacks going forward? I can see Jose getting joy out of making the game dull and us winning 1-0 or 2-1.
Looking at pressing stats, we are top 4 in the league in pressuring the opponent in their own half. Changing to sit back would be the opposite of how we have played most of the year.
Jose must be pretty confident of going 2-0 up and then shutting shopWould have rathered Gedson on the bench over 3 defenders though
It also ensured that he wouldn't have to join the South Korean squad. Perhaps we're becoming a little more streetwise, particularly now Sonny's got no National Service worries!I dont think it was a con, just not as bad as it was first made out.
People had him out for a few months before the game ended, when noone would know by then