What's new

Mateo Musacchio

Big Jeff

Active Member
May 4, 2014
145
160
Because of the whole third party ownership nonsense I can't see this happening, funny though because you know some fans will still vent their frustration on Levy lol

Silly people. I will never understand why these people would rather have a dig at our own chairman, than people at other clubs. In their eyes, nothing Levy does can ever right. For me, that's a weird way of supporting the club.
 

Ledleys Knee

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2014
1,521
3,760
I agree here that I dont think it will happen either.
But if that means we don't get a CB to partner Verts then I think Levy & Baldini deserve the blame.
After LB it was the 2nd position to address and it seems we have only 1 option.
Surely there are other adequate CBs out there...?

MM is our 3rd option after Lovren and Hector Moreno. How far down the barrel do you want to go?

If we don't get MM now, Moreno might be fit again come January
 

ButchCassidy

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2012
3,986
15,846
Half expecting a deadline day swoop for Reid if this doesn't come off... which would be massively underwhelming but honestly wouldn't be the worst short term fix.
 

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,894
130,530
This will happen IMO. Not as early as anyone would've liked but what can you do. JJ said 80% chance and was very optimistic about this (which is unlike him) and he hasn't really changed his stance.
 

y1dk1d

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2012
2,052
4,911
This will happen IMO. Not as early as anyone would've liked but what can you do. JJ said 80% chance and was very optimistic about this (which is unlike him) and he hasn't really changed his stance.
As someone pointed out yesterday (and was given a winner by JJ) he didn't say this is 80% done. He simply informed us that even after medical ect he'd only class THAT as 80% done
 

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,894
130,530
As someone pointed out yesterday (and was given a winner by JJ) he didn't say this is 80% done. He simply informed us that even after medical ect he'd only class THAT as 80% done
But didn't A&C say that JJ meant that he would only rate deals as 80% done after a medical and he said he was currently 80% confident, suggesting he's very hopeful/sure that this will happen. Maybe I'm wrong though.
 

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,176
19,689
This will happen IMO. Not as early as anyone would've liked but what can you do. JJ said 80% chance and was very optimistic about this (which is unlike him) and he hasn't really changed his stance.

JJ rated this post optimistic... :(
 

y1dk1d

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2012
2,052
4,911
But didn't A&C say that JJ meant that he would only rate deals as 80% done after a medical and he said he was currently 80% confident, suggesting he's very hopeful/sure that this will happen. Maybe I'm wrong though.
I'm not sure now either lol
 

Sweech

Ruh Roh Ressegnon
Jun 27, 2013
6,752
16,378
I'm amazed La Liga still allows 3rd party ownership, it's a ridiculous concept.

As if transfers weren't difficult enough in the first place.

I'm not amazed at all. 3rd party ownership makes A LOT of sense for La Liga.

Firstly, the country of Spain got hit with a financial crisis and all the teams took a hit, except for Barcelona and Real (and perhaps some others) who have/had dirty money keeping them afloat. 3rd party ownership means all these other teams can buy players for far cheaper because they're only buying smaller percentages of the player. Meaning the league itself can have sustained success even when under large financial trouble.

Secondly, it makes transfers harder to complete. Which for them is not a bad thing. Oh no, La Liga teams have to keep there good players unless mega offers come in. That's only a good thing for them. Players can still move up teams as they either get bought by mega rich Barcelona or Real Madrid who can afford to purchase the entirety of the player or they get sold to a different La Liga team who only has to buy the team's percentage of the player as the 3rd parties can still retain their ownership. So the player can move, but still stays in La Liga which again is just another win for the league.
 

yiddo

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2003
543
1,099
MM is our 3rd option after Lovren and Hector Moreno.

Then where were we for Lovren?? Its not as if he was snapped up before we had a chance to go in for him.As for Moreno, I am not sure how you could possibly know this unless you are really ITK.
 

Armstrong_11

Spurs makes me happy, you... not so much :)
Aug 3, 2011
8,614
19,294
Then where were we for Lovren?? Its not as if he was snapped up before we had a chance to go in for him.As for Moreno, I am not sure how you could possibly know this unless you are really ITK.

Think we were always in for Lovern, Lallana... We just ain't gonna play silly money for them. 20M for Lovern is just maddness. Liverpool out bid us fair and square imo...

Can't tell u if they were wise to do so, or dumb till the end of the season. But if it wasn't for Liverpool, think we will do to Southampton what we did to Pompey when Harry took over... Which is grab the best from that team.

We would most likely have seen Lovern, Lallana, J Roy and MS in a spurs jersey if we had our way. But thats life, we are always not gonna over pay. So hope it works out for us.
 

crokey

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2012
2,433
7,467
But didn't A&C say that JJ meant that he would only rate deals as 80% done after a medical and he said he was currently 80% confident, suggesting he's very hopeful/sure that this will happen. Maybe I'm wrong though.

Mate you need to stop hanging on weeks old ITK. Things change, it's not hard to get your head round it.
 

Topeka

To Win It All
Aug 11, 2014
331
366
I'm not amazed at all. 3rd party ownership makes A LOT of sense for La Liga.

Firstly, the country of Spain got hit with a financial crisis and all the teams took a hit, except for Barcelona and Real (and perhaps some others) who have/had dirty money keeping them afloat. 3rd party ownership means all these other teams can buy players for far cheaper because they're only buying smaller percentages of the player. Meaning the league itself can have sustained success even when under large financial trouble.

Secondly, it makes transfers harder to complete. Which for them is not a bad thing. Oh no, La Liga teams have to keep there good players unless mega offers come in. That's only a good thing for them. Players can still move up teams as they either get bought by mega rich Barcelona or Real Madrid who can afford to purchase the entirety of the player or they get sold to a different La Liga team who only has to buy the team's percentage of the player as the 3rd parties can still retain their ownership. So the player can move, but still stays in La Liga which again is just another win for the league.
Its interesting that the GFC did not impact on the top Spanish clubs and that they seem to be above financial scrutiny!
 

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,176
19,689
A question regarding the 30%. Is that the majority share of this player?

Because, in a sale, wouldn't the majority owner ultimately make the decision?

If Villarreal aren't the majority owner, then who is? Who owns the remaining 70% of him and how is it split?

It may be that the final decision is not in the hands of Villarreal, despite their assertions that he'll stay.
 

thebetamaxboy

Active Member
Jun 5, 2012
382
480
A question regarding the 30%. Is that the majority share of this player?

Because, in a sale, wouldn't the majority owner ultimately make the decision?

If Villarreal aren't the majority owner, then who is? Who owns the remaining 70% of him and how is it split?

It may be that the final decision is not in the hands of Villarreal, despite their assertions that he'll stay.

That's a good point, River Plate and The Players Agent would be pretty daft to sign away a controlling stake so early on in MM's career whereby Villarreal could effectively run out their asset but refusing the player a move.
 

Amo

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
15,799
31,486
A question regarding the 30%. Is that the majority share of this player?

Because, in a sale, wouldn't the majority owner ultimately make the decision?

If Villarreal aren't the majority owner, then who is? Who owns the remaining 70% of him and how is it split?

It may be that the final decision is not in the hands of Villarreal, despite their assertions that he'll stay.

Well, since no one holds a majority stake, no one is a majority holder.
 
Top