What's new

Modric would consider leaving if the move was right

Legend10

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2006
10,847
5,277
Rooney doesnt have a release clause. Torres did not have one. Charlie Adam doesnt have one but his contract only has a year left. That is the pressure.

Anything might be true but if there is no evidence for it- or evidence to the contrary- what is the value in saying it?


Doesn't he?

Again I don't know whether he does or he doesn't but it woulld be interesting to know how you know he doesn't?


Wayne Rooney's new Manchester United contract 'does contain a break clause'

Wayne Rooney is thought to have negotiated a break clause in his new five-year contract with Manchester United.


rooney_1745697c.jpg
Wayne Rooney is understood to have a clause in his new contract allowing him to leave Manchester United Photo: ACTION IMAGES






11:00PM BST 23 Oct 2010
comments.gif
Comment


A source close to his representatives has said that he believes the striker can leave for as little as £30 million if certain targets are not met on a year-by-year basis. Manchester United have denied that such a clause exists.

Telegraph Sport has learned that Rooney’s camp were always seeking to have a release strategy inserted in the contract.

According to another source close to the negotiating team, Rooney’s representatives took legal advice on how to build a clause that would allow the player to leave Old Trafford if the Glazers were to renege on their promise to invest in the team.

Rooney’s deal is thought to be worth in the region of £160,000 per week in basic salary but could top £200,000 once incentives are worked in. All parties in the deal are prevented from speaking publicly about the details of the deal by a confidentiality agreement.

Break clauses are inserted as standard in contracts in Spanish football, and are generally related to the total wages the player will earn throughout his contract. The insertion of a break clause gives the player the freedom to move if his valuation is met, but it also protects the club against players who try to force cut-price deals.

Related Articles




Rooney signed the contract on Friday morning to cap a remarkable week in which he issued a public statement implicitly criticising his United team-mates just hours before his side’s Champions League game against Bursaspor.
Rooney, who turns 25 on Sunday, has apologised to the fans and to his team-mates for the “hurt” he caused last week.
He had broken off talks on a new contract on Aug 14 and, after another unsuccessful meeting, claimed on Oct 14 that, despite what Sir Alex Ferguson had claimed, he did not have an ankle injury.
This act of public dissent was followed by news of the contract situation leaking into the public domain.
After a week of claim and counter-claim which appeared to make Rooney’s future at Old Trafford untenable, Stretford agreed to meet with chief executive David Gill and Ferguson, a meeting in which the Rooney camp decided to take up United’s improved offer, even if it fell short of what Manchester City would have been able to pay.
 

Legend10

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2006
10,847
5,277
Rooney doesnt have a release clause. Torres did not have one. Charlie Adam doesnt have one but his contract only has a year left. That is the pressure.

Anything might be true but if there is no evidence for it- or evidence to the contrary- what is the value in saying it?


Just remind me again, how much did Chelsea pay for Torres?


Liverpool reject £35m Chelsea bid for Fernando Torres

• Abramovich shows renewed ambition to revive Chelsea
• Fernando Torres has £50m release clause in his contract




  • Andy Hunter
  • The Guardian, Friday 28 January 2011 <li class="history">Article history
    Fernando-Torres-007.jpg
    Chelsea have long been admirers of the Liverpool and Spain striker Fernando Torres. Photograph: John Powell/Liverpool FC via Getty Images

    Roman Abramovich attempted to revive Chelsea's faltering Premier League title defence last night with an audacious £35m bid for the Liverpool striker Fernando Torres. The offer was dismissed out of hand by Liverpool's new owner, Fenway Sports Group.
    Chelsea have a long-standing interest in the Spain striker, whose form has improved in recent weeks under his new manager, Kenny Dalglish, and are known to have failed in one previous bid for the 26-year-old. Nevertheless, their sudden, late interest in this transfer window has come as a major surprise but has not tempted Liverpool into selling their prize asset as FSG looks to strengthen and not weaken Dalglish's squad in the final four days of the window.
    A Liverpool spokesman last night confirmed: "Chelsea have made a bid for Fernando which has been turned down. The player is not for sale."
    The champions' offer represented a transfer record between two British clubs and would have surpassed the £30.8m Abramovich paid to Milan for Andriy Shevchenko in July 2006. However, it fell significantly short of the £50m release clause that Torres had inserted last summer in his Liverpool contract, which has two and a half years to run.
    Liverpool granted the player the escape clause as part of the negotiations to keep him at Anfield at the end of last season. Torres was deeply dismayed at the lack of investment in the squad in the final years of Tom Hicks's and George Gillett's disastrous reign and the failure to qualify for this season's Champions League, and was aware of interest in him from Chelsea and Manchester City.
    He eventually elected to remain at Anfield following promises of new ownership and fresh investment, the former arriving with October's £300m takeover by FSG but the latter yet to materialise as the club continue to haggle with Ajax over the Uruguay international Luis Suárez. Liverpool have offered £12.8m for the striker but Ajax are insisting on £30m and a compromise will continue to be sought.
    Chelsea are also attempting to sign the Benfica defender David Luiz before the window shuts, although that deal has stalled over the payment of the £25.5m transfer fee, and their move for Torres provides confirmation of Abramovich's backing for the manager, Carlo Ancelotti.
    Abramovich must return with an improved offer to prise Torres from Anfield or hope the striker will submit a transfer request. Another season without Champions League football beckons for Liverpool but it appears unlikely at this stage that Torres, who has pledged loyalty to Anfield in recent months and has a close rapport with Dalglish, would stun his employers with such a move. Chelsea refused to comment on the offer last night.

 

Legend10

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2006
10,847
5,277
Just a look at how Levy has conducted himself business-wise over the last 5 years should be enough to tell people he wouldn't include a minimum release clause for a player of £25m when he'd paid £14m for him.


Who has ever said if there was one it would be £25 million?
 

Legend10

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2006
10,847
5,277
Torres did have one put in his contract when renewing it but originally he didn't have one. He is very much an exception though as they are few and far between in England which for most people is common knowledge.


So the general public know the ins and outs of professional footballers contracts do they?

Do me a favour!
 

Spurger King

can't smile without glue
Jul 22, 2008
43,881
95,149
Are you having a one-man argument?

You know what..don't bother answering that. I'm going to sleep.
 
Top