- May 4, 2004
- 10,775
- 1,055
Maybe a close second to the Maracana
La Bombonera!
Maybe a close second to the Maracana
Cant see how traffic can pose a problem the goons built a new stadium and the traffic round there is as bad if not worse than the lane.
I was told as well that they or any other club will never be allowed to build a stadium over 60k as Ken Livingstone dont think that London could cope with the amount of people.
N10toN17
Totally agree with what you said. Recently I had a look round Ar5ena1's new stadium, thought it to be impressive but then thought, how on Earth do they get 60,000 out of here in a half decent time? The location of that stadium is far worse than that of WHL yet people always complain. Last time I went WHL, it was piss easy! From the stadium exit onto a train at WHL station it took 15 minutes, at max!
I honestly think some people have their reasons for what they sau but I really think that WHL would be able to cope with 50,000.
Personally I'd be quite happy if we could stay at the Lane and simply build a tier or two on top and gradually expand that way - but hey I'm no architect so what do I know?
and I basically agree with N10 re the congestion - what's new -
I went to Old Trafford - it was a nightmare getting away from there by public transport - I went to the Millennium - ditto - it was laways a nightmare at Wembley and it seems little has changed
get to the Lane early - have a drink or two - then after the game do the same or take a walk to avoid the worst of the jams -
if you're in a car - well ditto - just don't drink alcohol
PS - NO GROUND SHARE!!!!
Hi DC, how are you old boy, I've forgotten why your so against ground share, personally I'd prefer as you to build bit by bit at the lane or a new stadium just behind the current holy temple, but if the club thought a groundshare was best with the current ground being rebuilt I could live with that, but not for long. !!!!
I'm fine N10 - how's you
there are many reasons why I'm against a temporary groundshare (I'd have happily done a permanent one with Arsenal if/when the chance was there)
first off what are the feasible options - none in my view - but it looks like Upton Park - to me that's a recipe for trouble
plus my big fear is what happens if our ground build overruns and the temporary contract runs out - we're homeless and out of the league
also what big club has ever done the ground share route - none - there have got to be good reasons why
what happened to Wimbledon? disaster
what nearly happened to Charlton - disaster
Now I must admit as I've said before on here, I'm one of life's worriers - so if business like Levy who are far cleverer and realistic than me say yea to it - then fine - but I'll be worried all the way I can tell you
Arsenal shared WHL for a Season!? that was ok