- Sep 20, 2005
- 9,999
- 5,495
Chelsea rumoured to be making enquiries, struggling to think who could replace him?
Richards? :grin:
Luke Young? :-|
:shrug:
Richards? :grin:
Luke Young? :-|
:shrug:
Stalteri?
Carl.?
Chelsea rumoured to be making enquiries, struggling to think who could replace him?
Richards? :grin:
Luke Young? :-|
:shrug:
i think chimbonda is shit anyway.
In the first half of the season everyone was saying how well Chimbs was playing. He made some errors in the later stages and as some have said he is sometimes a little slow getting back and sometimes dribbles out of defence when a simple ball will do. But this was his first season for us and he played I guess around 50 matches. I would say he made less critical defensive errors in those 50 matches than Salteri did in his 30-35 matches the previous season. So why should we sell him ? We are building a squad not trying to make a quick buck. We have to have 2 players in every position and so it would make no sense. He should stay at least another season to prove himself.
Not everybody friend, not everybody!In the first half of the season everyone was saying how well Chimbs was playing.
The first "error" that he made that cost us goals was way back in September against Liverpool. Since then he has cost us goals in the Carling Cup, FA Cup and UEFA Cup, in the Carling and UEFA those goals contributed to us being knocked out of the competition, less so in the Carling than UEFA though I have to admit.He made some errors in the later stages and as some have said he is sometimes a little slow getting back and sometimes dribbles out of defence when a simple ball will do.
I would seriously challenge that statement. Stalteri did VERY LITTLE WRONG, he has done absolutely nothing wrong when he has come in this season, he ever kept Robben quiet to such an extent that Robben was taken off.[/quote]But this was his first season for us and he played I guess around 50 matches. I would say he made less critical defensive errors in those 50 matches than Salteri did in his 30-35 matches the previous season.
Simple. Making a profit for a 28/29yr old defender who has an allergy to defending so we can play someone who defends with everything they have makes good business sense.So why should we sell him ? We are building a squad not trying to make a quick buck.
You mean until people see him doing the same things over and over again before they finally get the message that he simply won't defend?We have to have 2 players in every position and so it would make no sense. He should stay at least another season to prove himself.
Reams of nonsense