- Jun 18, 2012
- 3,378
- 5,605
Trippier has more potential to improve IMO. If he can tighten up defensively he will be better than Walker.
He's never going to be faster.
Trippier has more potential to improve IMO. If he can tighten up defensively he will be better than Walker.
Walker's been Poch's first choice for key games all season apart from the last week; the most critical week of our season so far. Cup semi against Chelsea, a title-relevant, end-of-season NLD - Trips gets the nod over Walker? There's something going on. Poch's making a statement, but doesn't mean he's "trying to ostracise him".
I don't agree with the "vastly" better description. It's appropriate in a Rose vs Davies comparison, but not with our RBs. I like them both; different players with different strengths/weaknesses.
Walker is stronger defensively. In an attacking sense, his very presence means opposition AMs are pushed further back, because they're wary of his pace. This is especially important when we play those teams who have the weapons to attack. Walker's far more dangerous in transition, purely because of his pace, not because of his distribution.
He doesn't need a killer pass in those situations; he just needs to carry the ball up and find another Spurs shirt in transition. Also, when Rose is on the other flank, oppo midfields and defences are really stretched and vulnerable during those transitions. They have to cope with the movement of an advancing Eriksen, Alli and Kane threatening in different positions. Having two pacy wing backs is a real offensive weapon for us.
Trips is not as quick, so we won't have as many opportunities in transition. His footballing IQ is higher imo; his distribution and crossing is way better, but when we're facing good teams, he's penned back with defensive duties, and doesn't provide Walker's threat in transition. We play a mid and lower table side who are parking the bus, Trippier is a better option.
He's never going to be faster.
You forget how desperate Pep is for English players£250k a week would make him amongst the top 4 or 5 paid players in the league. That's a lot of salt needed...
Agreed. But he will get more assists than Walker for sureHe's never going to be faster.
With his delivery he doesn't need to be.He's never going to be faster.
With his delivery he doesn't need to be.
Does anyone think Kyle Walker could sometimes play as a covering center back in a three at the back system to help combat teams like Chelsea, Man United, Man City etc that have really quick forward players who can out pace Toby and Verts on the break/through balls.
How strange. Walker's always seemed so down to earth. Such an odd time to start agitating for a move, unless I'm misreading the signs.
If Walker leaves are we talking £50 million? If so then he can be replaced