Ocampos has actually been playing more right wing then left wing the last two seasons. He's two footed and can play ether wing and has been used on both flanks pretty constantly over his career, ether way I wouldn't necessarily read their interest in him means they no longer want Soloman as they could very comfortably play in the same line up.
I don't know what the legal ramifications of signing him are, i originally assumed there wouldn't be any but considering how he is still a free agent there must be something. I can understand why we are being cautious with this one.
His club threatened to sue anyone signing him.
I know that part but I don't know if they actually have any real grounds for doing it as surely the responsibility would lie with Fifa for changing the rules not us. From what i have read FIFA changed the regulations so that foreign players could suspend their contract in the event of war breaking out. Solomon still has 1 year left on his contract with Shakhtar and they have lodged an appeal to get the decision reversed. Although I think its unlikely the fact is if they did win their appeal whoever signs Solomon would be in a difficult situation. Ether way his contract is suspended not annulled so again im not sure what that means. To what degree is a he actually free.
I guess what he's arguing is if a club took a soloman and sold them on quickly for profit.
7 days is more than enough in Ibiza
Yes, me too! As I said above.
Who owns Shaktar? If it's a Russian then go ahead and screw them. Otherwise, let it go.
It's the richest man in Ukraine that owns them.
A Ukrainian owns the biggest team in Ukraine. Not surprising.
I would tend to agree, but until recently, one very big non-Russian club was owned by a Russian, and also the entire Donetsk oblast has been under Russian control since 2014, so I entertained the possibility.
I fucking hate it when people use variations of the term “it’s just business” to justify moral bankruptcy tbh.
