What's new

Qatar 2022

Delboy75

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2021
3,935
10,279
Yep those are good times for the UK at least definitely can't complain. It will be weird having the final just before christmas though.

Yup it’s gonna be a weird vibe. I have so many World Cup memories that revolve around long hot summers and the way it all intertwines. I just don’t think it will be the same but we will see. I really hope they manage to fill the stadiums. Was watching the draw yesterday and the bbc showed iconic moments from previous world cups. It’s amazing how those moments stay with you for a lifetime. Like most of them especially the England ones I remember exactly where I was. David Platt Vs Belgium was my first foreign trip without my parents in Amsterdam absolutely wasted amazed I can actually remember it ?
 

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
Except for that god fucking awful Sweet Caroline song I'm so looking forward to this World Cup.


OK, I like to think I'm quite a tolerable man, but you've crossed a line here.

That song is an absolute anthem & Neil Diamond was/is an absolute legend.

You've hurt my soul.
 

Delboy75

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2021
3,935
10,279
Tbh if the players were in England they’d probably be playing same or more games I don’t really see a massive issue with it. Although obviously Not saying I’d plan to have it this way.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
9,263
11,308
Except for that god fucking awful Sweet Caroline song I'm so looking forward to this World Cup.
I’m not watching any of it out of principle and It p!she’s me off that it’s been hijacked from cricket! It’s been sung at cricket for years but now it doesn’t feel unique and a cricket anthem.
Football has enough songs, waiting for the England supporters to start singing swing low, sweet chariot next….
 
Last edited:

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,189
63,967

Jgplk1

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2005
2,076
19,534
Screenshot_20220406-212919_Instagram.jpg
 

cwy21

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2009
9,775
8,438
I've yet to see a better source on this but my guess is they might instruct referees to be more strict on adding lost time.
 

Jgplk1

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2005
2,076
19,534
I've yet to see a better source on this but my guess is they might instruct referees to be more strict on adding lost time.
From the article

"According to the CIES Football Observatory, the ball only remains in play for 64.7% of matches in the Champions League, and that number drops to just 62% in the Premier League.

England's top tier has the lowest percentage of the big leagues, although the Championship is even lower with just 57.2% of ball in play time.

FIFA are hoping to improve the amount of time that the game is being played by adding an extra 10 minutes, although it wouldn't improve the percentages."
 

cwy21

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2009
9,775
8,438
Might be easier though to have refs add more time then to get IFAB to approve making the game longer. Unless the home nations would support the change to get them up to 6 of 8 votes.
 

LSUY

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2005
24,027
66,879
Why doesn't football simply do what rugby, NFL and many other sports do and stop the clock whenever the ball is out of play?
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
From the article

"According to the CIES Football Observatory, the ball only remains in play for 64.7% of matches in the Champions League, and that number drops to just 62% in the Premier League.

England's top tier has the lowest percentage of the big leagues, although the Championship is even lower with just 57.2% of ball in play time.

FIFA are hoping to improve the amount of time that the game is being played by adding an extra 10 minutes, although it wouldn't improve the percentages."

Stage one: Add ten minutes to the length of the game.
Stage two: Divide the game into quarters.
Stage three: Earn lots of extra money through more ad breaks.
 

cwy21

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2009
9,775
8,438
Why doesn't football simply do what rugby, NFL and many other sports do and stop the clock whenever the ball is out of play?

The question becomes how far down the pyramid would you do the two thirty minute halves? At the pro level it's easy enough. You have a million refs and could easily have a timekeeper like the NFL. But what about at the pub level when you have a single ref and no assistants, much less a scoreboard and timekeeper? Does that level just continue to play 90 minute games like now?
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
Why doesn't football simply do what rugby, NFL and many other sports do and stop the clock whenever the ball is out of play?

You could, but you'd need to reduce the playing time to around an hour. If they continued with ninety minutes it would probably be the equivalent of playing normal time and extra time as it stands now.
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,511
330,452
From the article

"According to the CIES Football Observatory, the ball only remains in play for 64.7% of matches in the Champions League, and that number drops to just 62% in the Premier League.

England's top tier has the lowest percentage of the big leagues, although the Championship is even lower with just 57.2% of ball in play time.

FIFA are hoping to improve the amount of time that the game is being played by adding an extra 10 minutes, although it wouldn't improve the percentages."
It wouldn't help with the number of injuries either. It would just end up with more people in the treatment room, and less players able to play in their big tournaments

Link
 
Top