Disagree re Waddle and Bale. Waddle is still probably the most exciting player I saw at Spurs. His last season he was quite unbelievable (after Hoddle left, but before Lineker came sadly), winning any number of games almost single handidly. The demolition of Aston Villa and Paul McGrath in particular still springs to mind. No wonder Marseilles paid all that money for him. Not to say Bale can't match that. But Waddle at his best was a wondrous sight - 2 footed and in the air, and a mean free kick too - Bale's the closest I've seen since though...
Disagree re Waddle and Bale. Waddle is still probably the most exciting player I saw at Spurs. His last season he was quite unbelievable (after Hoddle left, but before Lineker came sadly), winning any number of games almost single handidly. The demolition of Aston Villa and Paul McGrath in particular still springs to mind. No wonder Marseilles paid all that money for him. Not to say Bale can't match that. But Waddle at his best was a wondrous sight - 2 footed and in the air, and a mean free kick too - Bale's the closest I've seen since though...
The Ardiles/Modric comparison is a good one. Very similar players. But VDV is nothing like Hoddle. I have really not seen a player like Hoddle since. Platini was the only player who was close that I can think of.
I have, to this day, never seen a player who could pass a ball with the vision and finesse of Hoddle.
I think Bale is more exciting than Waddle to be honest.
But how many games has Bale won for us already ? Would we have won Wednesday without his contribution ? Would we have got a point in Bremen without his contribution ? Already he is our most important creative player.
Wingers are a unique species aren't they ? Bale is more direct than players like Waddle and Ginola, very powerful and fast. His end product can be erratic but for 21 it's pretty damn good. There are few positions on a football field that entertain like a winger, but you always have to accept their foibles don't you ?
The thing with Bale is you have the potential to get a bit more team dynamism out of him as well as just as much creativity as the likes of Waddle gave you.
Bale was so wasteful - many of his dribbles, many of his crosses. Bassong, BAE, King and Huddlestone had much better game than Bale did.
This may not seem like the most flattering comparison in the macho world of football but watching Hoddle was probably the closest you'll ever see on a football pitch to watching a ballet. He just moved with a flowing grace, he had this air of superiority about him. You can get an idea of this if you watch the clips but to watch him week after week you just knew you were watching one of the the most talented footballers to ever kick a ball. Five times better than Beckham ever was and ten times better than Huddlestone ever will be.
But even after saying all that, Ardiles has always been my favourite player. Ardiles was like the Iniesta of his day. Constantly moving, seeing all angles, craft, intelligence and industry. It wasn't Mario Kempes that won the WC for Argentina it was Ardiles.
But how many games has Bale won for us already ? Would we have won Wednesday without his contribution ? Would we have got a point in Bremen without his contribution ? Already he is our most important creative player.
Wingers are a unique species aren't they ? Bale is more direct than players like Waddle and Ginola, very powerful and fast. His end product can be erratic but for 21 it's pretty damn good. There are few positions on a football field that entertain like a winger, but you always have to accept their foibles don't you ?
The thing with Bale is you have the potential to get a bit more team dynamism out of him as well as just as much creativity as the likes of Waddle gave you.