- Nov 24, 2004
- 2,827
- 1,035
He was slow and lacking in dynamism. But the ball sticks to him better than to anyone else in our team bar Bissouma and Maddison, so we'd lose that even when he's not finding the final pass - can we afford to relinquish that control, now that Kane's incredible retention of possession is gone?Kulusevski - Don't understand why he wasn't subbed. Just looks a bit slow and lacking in dynamism. Feel like getting Porro on with his runs could've made us more dangerous.
As for danger, he did get to the byline in the six yard box, in a full yard of space, and with almost a second to pick his cross, a couple of times. When most of our other players arrive at that spot, they're at full stretch and about to fall over. I think he was dangerous, just didn't find the right cutback.