What's new

Scott Parker

StartingPrice

Chief Sardonicus Hyperlip
Feb 13, 2004
32,568
10,280
The thing that still irks me about him somewhat is that he SHOULD have been playing for us for years by now. Alledgedly a fan of the club as a kid he repeatedly overlooked a move to us in favour of chasing the $$'s at less competetive sides like Newcastle and Wet Sham.

Other than that he has been good.

All players have to seperate their allegiances pre professional from their careeers as professionals - that is just the way it is.

The last player I am certain of to not do that was Steve Bull and it basically ruined his career in terms of the honours and international caps his ability may have earned.
 

Goldman

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2004
7,097
2,150
Parker has suprised me this season, he's been brilliant.Today Motm. Amazing.
 

Narnill

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
516
0
Like he said himself, he's raised his game since joining us. he is playing with more freedom now, instead of carrying the weight of West Ham on his shoulders every week.
 

mike_l

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2005
5,171
3,676
All players have to seperate their allegiances pre professional from their careeers as professionals - that is just the way it is.

The last player I am certain of to not do that was Steve Bull and it basically ruined his career in terms of the honours and international caps his ability may have earned.

I know I know, it's only a small gripe but it still rankles a little for me, we were the better footballing option above firstly Newcastle and then West Ham IMO (being as objective as possible) and it's not like we would have been offering peanuts in wages.

Essentially it's a compliment to him that I'm still somewhat bitter that he didn't join us earlier.
 

mabolsa_ritchey

aka Hugh G Rection
Oct 23, 2005
1,423
1,581
I know I know, it's only a small gripe but it still rankles a little for me, we were the better footballing option above firstly Newcastle and then West Ham IMO (being as objective as possible) and it's not like we would have been offering peanuts in wages.

Essentially it's a compliment to him that I'm still somewhat bitter that he didn't join us earlier.
Me too. What a player though. I admit that I also got swept up in the whole Diarra thing too and was a bit disappointed that we only ended up with Parker.
I wont be surprised if he's captain by Christmas.
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2004
23,206
30,399
In my defence I wanted both Parker and Diarra!

Think we should sell Huddlestone for Diarra for our next CM upgrade

Modric Sandro Parker Diarra as our 4 CMs!
 

StartingPrice

Chief Sardonicus Hyperlip
Feb 13, 2004
32,568
10,280
I know I know, it's only a small gripe but it still rankles a little for me, we were the better footballing option above firstly Newcastle and then West Ham IMO (being as objective as possible) and it's not like we would have been offering peanuts in wages.

Essentially it's a compliment to him that I'm still somewhat bitter that he didn't join us earlier.

:grin:
I agree, and would have had exactly the same feeling about the Barcode-Lovin', Spam-lovin' *anka...until the second he joined :grin:

Now he is OURS and must be defended to the def...him and his comic-book haircut :bowdown:

I was always in favour of signing him, however.
 

jimbo

Cabbages
Dec 22, 2003
8,071
7,550
I questioned his signing so I'll put my hand up. I will also so that it wasn't his ability that worried me but his potential for injury. So far, I'm very glad to have him.
 

cwhite02

SC Supporter
Sep 28, 2004
1,183
475
He's showing how he's matured in to a class player. A bargain for 5m, especially if we get back in the CL next season. Not every buy is going to end up with a big resale value.
 

Paolo10

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2004
6,179
7,621
I know I know, it's only a small gripe but it still rankles a little for me, we were the better footballing option above firstly Newcastle and then West Ham IMO (being as objective as possible) and it's not like we would have been offering peanuts in wages.

Essentially it's a compliment to him that I'm still somewhat bitter that he didn't join us earlier.

I think he's went where he has when he has for first team football first and foremost and then money after that. I think after Chelsea he wanted to play more than anything and I could imagine Newcastle and West Ham both offering him more opportunity to start regularly than we would have at those times.

You could actually see him grimace when he made that tackle and he hardly batted an eyelid for the next 10-15mins when he soldiered on. He's as hard as a coffin nail, I <3 him.
 

Paolo10

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2004
6,179
7,621
Parker is tailor-made for away games when we need a bit of bite in there, sometimes games can pass big Tom Thudd by.

Can't believe some people are trying the 'jobs for the boys' routine and mentioning someone like Pav in the same fucking breath as Parker, let alone this thread. Lionheart vs Mouseheart.

If he signs you'll see a level of commitment and desire that will most likely put most of the other players to shame. Scott Parker is a fucking hero and the type of player we need at the club.

Sandro and Parker away from home and when we need to match the more physical sides we've dropped points in this season.

I'd expect him to make so much of an impression he'd play very regularly and be outstanding too and a lot of people would have to eat their words. Hope he signs.

:razz:
 

RJ1882

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
2,122
1,843
^ Interesting comparison...

Regardless of his assets, I'd be very concerned how and when he'll be used.

Also, re the award, sports journos are clueless.


I suggest many football fans are clueless. Arrogance, ignorance, bias, blindness or genuine cluelessness - whichever it is, so so many on here underrated Scott Parker and based their views on his failed time at Chelsea and fact he played for a relegated team.

Early contender for signing of the season - and dare I say it, player of the season too :grin:
 

RJ1882

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
2,122
1,843
Tottenham snobbery from some on here thinking Parker isnt good enough for us. The Football Writers Player of the Year last season, in a very poor side, isnt good enough for us?
He has the tenacity of Palacios, the work rate of Jenas and goal scoring ability of Modric. Maybe not pass as well as Hudd, but is certainly a very good passer of a football. He has drive, determination, leadership, something we severly lack at times. Especially against the little sides when we struggle to break teams down. We often give up. Fans do anyway. Sitting in the stands watching us tear Westham to Shreads, I knew after 50 minutes that game was finishing 0-0. Someone like Parker can galvanise the team in situations like that and push the team on. Can Huddlestone? Great player in a winning side, but Hudd doesnt do the ugly stuff.

Dont get me wrong, in a 442 its Modric and Sandro, but in a 4231 with Modric maybe pushed further forward, PArker, Sandro and Huddlestone offer grea options and all something different in for those 2 positions.
Harry wants leaders, and I'd much rather Parker to Neville or Beckham.

Joe Cole........... now thats a different story.


Can I dig this up again :grin:
 

midoNdefoe

the member formerly and technically still known as
Mar 9, 2005
3,107
3,166
:bang:

- Flopped at this level when he was at his peak
- Can't even do a full season/badly tails off in the spring
- Would be our 5th best CM behind Modric, Sandro, Hudd and Palacios
- Old, high wages and depreciating rapidly
- Redknapp would play him ahead of Sandro and drive the Brazilian over to Spain/Italy.

Just thought i would bring this one back, from the first page.

Still feel that way?
 

Paolo10

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2004
6,179
7,621
Parker lifts Spurs as rivals Arsenal struggle

Monday, 3 October 2011

Harry Redknapp persuaded Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy to sacrifice his strict laws on simple football economics to give him the gift he wanted all summer by gambling on signing Scott Parker.

While Redknapp admits his pre-season was spoiled by the saga of Chelsea's interest in Luka Modric, he also spent time successfully convincing Levy that Parker was the man who could glue the parts of this gifted Spurs side together and return them to the Champions League.

Redknapp revealed it was not an easy task - but the early signs are that Levy, a tough negotiator and shrewd financial manager, may end up thanking his manager for getting him to take the punt on Parker.

In among the poison pouring from sections of both sets of supporters at White Hart Lane, a thrilling football match broke out and Parker's influence and midfield presence as Spurs beat Arsenal 2-1 was immense.

Redknapp explained how he had to work overtime to get Levy to sanction a deal to bring the 30-year-old, who was on a lucrative contract at West Ham United, to Spurs in a £5m deal.

"It wasn't an easy one for me to sign him," said Redknapp. "It wasn't an easy one for the football club but he was always the one I wanted from day one. It wasn't easy from the chairman's point of view to sign him - it was his age and length of contract. I understood the chairman's point of view but I always knew if we could get him he would do a fantastic job for us.

"I couldn't argue too much with the chairman's point of view either. If you look at the maths it was a difficult one because this was a four-year deal with no return at the end. But I said 'look - if he can take us forward and give us the chance to be up there then surely it's worth a gamble' and he backed me with that in the end."

parker_arsenal595.jpg

Scott Parker was influential for Spurs in the win over Arsenal. Photo: Getty Images


There was a sub-plot when Redknapp was asked had he expected more competition for Parker because the elephant in the room at that moment was Arsenal, whose performance in defeat at White Hart Lane suggested the steel and application he provides would have been perfect for Arsene Wenger's side.

Parker was the workhorse of this Spurs team, tackling, covering and occasionally getting forward. He kept his side going when they suffered in the first half and revelled when Redknapp beefed up his midfield by introducing Sandro in the second half.

He certainly outshone Arsenal's £10m deadline day signing Mikel Arteta, who was neat and tidy in possession but only operated on the fringes of a high-tempo encounter. It should be said that Arteta was not alone in that particular flaw.

This was a double bonus for Spurs. They have signed a player who fits their needs perfectly - and may just be showing their fiercest rivals what they could have had if Wenger had been willing to take the same chance on Parker.

Parker has seemingly been linked with Spurs for an age, certainly from his emergence at Charlton. And now he has arrived with the appearance of a player determined to make up for lost time.

He missed the boat during his brief spell at Chelsea and flourished only occasionally at Newcastle United before becoming a hero in relegation at West Ham United. There have been doubts about his class at the highest level, but he has finally convinced Fabio Capello of his worth to England and now he has the perfect stage to provide a final flourish to his career.

Wenger had no particular cause to celebrate his 15th anniversary at Arsenal. His team showed patches of promise but familiar failings let them down.

Per Mertesacker still looks uncertain in the Premier League, ponderous in a defensive combination with Bacary Sagna for Rafael Van der Vaart's opening goal for Spurs - although Arsenal insisted a hand was involved in its creation.

Aaron Ramsey's equaliser early in the second half was what Arsenal merited at that stage, but their confidence is so fragile they seemed more intent on keeping what they had rather than going for the win, allowing Spurs to gain momentum.

This resulted in Kyle Walker's late winner from distance which Wojciech Szczesny, a top-class goalkeeper in the making, should have saved.

This morning, Wenger must accept what may be an unpalatable truth that Spurs are currently a stronger team and a stronger squad than Arsenal and Parker is part of that painful equation for a manager who has been used to domination in north London.

The pre-season predictions had these two sides battling it out for fourth place and a slot in the Champions League. On this evidence Spurs are ahead on all counts.

This was not a freak result. Spurs have recorded three wins and a draw in their last four league meetings with Arsenal. The balance has shifted and will take some redressing with Arsenal's squad in its current circumstances.
Sadly, there was an ugly side to the entertainment and this simply cannot be ignored. The behaviour of a section of both sets of fans brought shame to Spurs and Arsenal.

Arsenal fans were guilty of desperately tasteless chanting in the direction of their former striker Emmanuel Adebayor, loudly referencing the attack by gunmen on the Togo national team's coach in Angola last January.

Redknapp's description of the incidents as "disgusting" found no dissenters - but Spurs' fans were equally guilty with their despicable chanting in Wenger's direction.

This has been an unwelcome thread running throughout this season, highlighted also by incidents involving Leeds United and Manchester United at the recent Carling Cup tie.

It usually leads to a "they started it" defence or insistence that it is merely a tit-for-tat retaliation. The brutal truth is that it is a scar on football and all chants of this nature, by any supporters, are worthy of the strongest condemnation.

Poor old Wenger's frustration even continued after the final whistle when he was involved in a faintly farcical spat with Spurs coach Clive Allen over his apparent refusal to shake his hand.

Sympathy surely has to be with Wenger when he correctly pointed out that he had shaken hands with Redknapp and his assistant Kevin Bond, asking: "How many people do I have to shake hands with? Is this a prescription?"

Wenger has been correctly criticised for not shaking hands with fellow managers before, but here he had a point. It would take quite some time to go through the formalities and satisfy the cast of thousands that passes as a manager's retinue these days and Allen is very much a peripheral figure.

As this sideshow was unfolding behind him, Parker made his way off high-fiving Spurs fans as he made his way down the tunnel. It may have taken Redknapp some time to get him to Spurs - but he is in the form that suggests the wait will be worthwhile.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/philmcnulty/2011/10/harry_redknapp_persuaded_totte.html
 
Top