- Jun 6, 2005
- 53,378
- 67,032
Ethan, Steven - do you honestly think that, were the boot on the other foot, the Woolwich would've considered the same? Not at all.
Why would a ground share with them have given us any advantage anyway? I don't see the relevance at all - sharing a ground means sharing gate receipts and an increased volume of games in any shared stadium means you have to pay twice for the stewards, twice for the staff surrounding, twice for the vendors, twice as much hassle for the old bill and a move from the area where our most loyal fanbase is.
It would've been a f*cking disaster if we'd decided to ground share with them and, as pointed out earlier on, when was this even on the cards as more than just a suggested possibility?
We've got a board that's holding us on a steady path money-wise, yet are frugal enough to not let us become the next Leeds. We could easily have shelled out on a new stadium a couple of years ago, seeking creditors and loans to cover it, much as the Woolwich did, but we would never have been able to pay them back - we needed to expand as a club first and, now the fans can smell we have success lurking around under the pitch somewhere, we're virtually filling our ground for every match - a boast only about 4 other teams can sensibly make.
Let's not start looking to the past when we have such a rosey future, eh? :up:
Why would a ground share with them have given us any advantage anyway? I don't see the relevance at all - sharing a ground means sharing gate receipts and an increased volume of games in any shared stadium means you have to pay twice for the stewards, twice for the staff surrounding, twice for the vendors, twice as much hassle for the old bill and a move from the area where our most loyal fanbase is.
It would've been a f*cking disaster if we'd decided to ground share with them and, as pointed out earlier on, when was this even on the cards as more than just a suggested possibility?
We've got a board that's holding us on a steady path money-wise, yet are frugal enough to not let us become the next Leeds. We could easily have shelled out on a new stadium a couple of years ago, seeking creditors and loans to cover it, much as the Woolwich did, but we would never have been able to pay them back - we needed to expand as a club first and, now the fans can smell we have success lurking around under the pitch somewhere, we're virtually filling our ground for every match - a boast only about 4 other teams can sensibly make.
Let's not start looking to the past when we have such a rosey future, eh? :up: