You totally misread my post, missed my point and now arguing tangentially.
My point is poch should stay here and develop his craft as he still has a lot to learn.
I know you.re new, mate, so I don't take it personally that you don't know you're literally talking to the person who first championed poch coming here, on this forum.
Have a nice day, sir.
Let's see before we assume huh? But even with Skipp in MF and Llorente upfront and Lamela or Lucas in AM for a month I'd make us strong favourites. Especially as it corresponds with favourable games. Trust in Pooch
That my posts are typically 'knee jerk'.What that I don’t think Pochettino tactics are “seasoned enough” for Man U or Real Madrid even though both are or have been after him
Gonna be a mass wankfest over their keeper now. When the truth of the matter is they were all pretty much regulation saves. We should have buried at least 4 of those chances in the 2nd half and been out of site
Ben Foster has just backed this up. Positioning and standing strong make a huge difference.I was behind the goal second half. I think if you were you would change your tune. His reactions and positioning were world class. Sometimes you just have to take your hat off to a world class display.
Davies is a passer. Fired in some nice balls to the strikers between lines as usual. He's not a winger no but what percentage of or goals actually come from crosses? He's a much better passer than Rose. But because he can't dribble past a man he contributes " nothing "Davies is not the player to suit playing Son on the left. Davies didn’t overlap once with Son. Rose would have done. Effectively we were playing with ten men first half. Such a waste.
That my posts are typically 'knee jerk'.
Where? Show me.
Or you are what you're accusing me of.
Just back from the game....not sure what's more annoying playing crap and losing (Wolves) or playing well and losing like today.
I am these days always worried when Mike Dean refs' our games, because as I've said before all this "Spurs bias" talk means he has to go and PROVE there is no Spurs bias. It looked like he was doing just that from where i was sitting but haven't seen any replays yet.
so was he as bad as appeared to those inside the ground??
Them being after him is one thing.Me being new here has nothing to do with it. I’m new to the forum, not to being a Spurs fan. I’ve been through all the shit of the 80s and 90s and trust me if we lose Poch we’ll end up back there. You said he wasn’t ‘tactically seasoned’ to manage either Man U or Real Madrid and yet they are the two clubs that are after him so he can’t be that bad. If we had beat them 3-0 today like we did at their manor he would be a master tactician to everyone and it pisses me off when people slate him. I wasn’t arguing with you, just putting my point across. We lost today. I’m as pissed off as anyone but you can’t blame anybody but the players and possibly Levy for not allowing some coin for new players.
No hard feelings.
Just back from the game....not sure what's more annoying playing crap and losing (Wolves) or playing well and losing like today.
I am these days always worried when Mike Dean refs' our games, because as I've said before all this "Spurs bias" talk means he has to go and PROVE there is no Spurs bias. It looked like he was doing just that from where i was sitting but haven't seen any replays yet.
so was he as bad as appeared to those inside the ground??
It was a collection of things.Thought it was obvious.
You critised Pochettinos tactics today after we lost a game that was nothing to do with his tactics imo, It was down to bad finishing.
How is that not a big deal?
Davies is a passer. Fired in some nice balls to the strikers between lines as usual. He's not a winger no but what percentage of or goals actually come from crosses? He's a much better passer than Rose. But because he can't dribble past a man he contributes " nothing "
I disagree it was a yo-yo half. We also didn't prevent Chelsea from playing a possession game. We stop Jorginho for orchestrating the game, but they still had 60% of the possession. We invited their full-backs to forward by putting no one in front of them and then played it forward quickly to Son to exploit the space. That's what United did to us in the first half. We tried to draw them on to us with the ball but they didn't really budge. They were happy to let us have the ball in our own half or out wide with no options to play the ball forward. Rarely did we move Young or Shaw away from their centre backs for Son or Alli to run into.For me a counter is when you are attacking, namely towards the opposition goal and the defending team wins the ball in their half and exposes the offensive positioning the other team has. This has little individual mistakes more to do with the positioning of the team. Sometimes you have to accept the possibility of being done on the counter when attacking. The difference is the goal we coincided was in part due to an individual error. In situation where we shouldn't be at risk.
I don't think we were in control. But I don't think its our right to be incontrol against Man utd. It was a yoyo first half end to end. We were trying create intricate moves in attack, often getting close to pulling them off, but getting exposed on the counter, which although scary, were largely dealt with. It was largely even, we got more shots off, but often from range, we had the best chance with winks, but they were countering very well and could of scored.
But, before conceding we were beginning to settle into the game. Man Utd hadn't got a shot off for almost 20 mins, at that same time we got 4 shots off. It sounds weird but Man utd actually had more shots in the second half. In most games we play a game where we trust our CB,they are both very good one on one, and often it appears pretty scary, but they deal with it.
Its not really comparable to Chelsea,Chelsea want to play a patient possession based game, we prevented them from doing that. Man utd wanted to play an open game, I think we fancied our chances in that kind of game and we didn't really try to change its nature. Maybe that was the wrong move, but I believe if we were to play the same kind of game we did today 10 times we'd win 7 of them.In the PL we created more chances today than any other game apart from against fulham. We are a team that often concedes more chances than we create, normally we go for quality over quantity. Today with our chances we should of done more, and for me that was our major failing, its not the first time this has been the case.