- Jan 4, 2006
- 8,603
- 14,091
He scored 4 goals for us in 12 games, during a period in which we won only 5 of the 15 league games he was available for.
I don't think he was "shit" at all, but you seem to be insinuating it, so I was reminding you of the circumstances at the time.
Redknapp was the manager, so ultimately he was responsible for everything that went on on the field, so if you judge that Saha was "shit" then I'd invite you to connect the dots.
Comparing what we paid for Ferdinand, and his strike rate, I'd say that Saha (at 33 years old) was a bargain and I'm happy we got to include such a talented player in our lineup, even if you disagree.
Calling him shit was maybe a bit harsh but he was included in the worst spurs signing article for a reason.
Disagree with you regarding rednapp "being responsible for everything that went on the field".
What happens on the field is mainly down to the players quality and effort , the manager can only do so much