- May 8, 2005
- 41,857
- 25,920
- Admin
- #201
I'm just gonna jog your memory, but Dembele played most of the game against Chelsea. He came on for Mason quite early on.While I don't typically agree with the logic of "we played well in x game, so should therefore use that same lineup" as I think lineups should somewhat be tailored to who you're playing against, I agree with some of the logic you're suggesting here. I think people get too carried away with form and don't take enough account of the opposition.
In particular, I think people are getting carried away with Dembele's performances against a League One side and a really crappy West Brom performance. Even then, our only goal from open play which he assisted was far more due to individual brilliance from Kane rather than a particularly clever or incisive pass from Dembele. That Dembele was subbed off early in both matches rather says it all about true effect of the system, and I think with Chadli back up to fitness he has to come back into the side. No player of ours is better at capitalizing on afforded space than Chadli, and a very forward-thinking and aggressive Arsenal is just the kind of game he thrives in.
I also cannot emphasize enough from the Man U and Chelsea matches how important it is Eriksen remain central in matches like this. His ability to use the No 10 spot to disrupt the opposition's passing from deep central to force the ball to the opposition's flanks is so vital to maintaining the press. In fact, it was Eriksen's pressure which led to our last goal against Arsenal, and Chadli capitalizing upon being played into space. Dembele is not quick enough to do this against Arsenal's speedy and more diminutive midfielders, and his physicality further forward would not be as important since we're less likely to establish an effective press with him less likely to engage those speedy midfielders.